Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Brian West
Thats a great step forward. Auto for PRI doesn't make sense... but two configs to describe the same thing makes no sense. /b On Oct 21, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 11:57:45AM -0500, Brian West wrote: >> It actually CAN but because someone was lazy and didn

Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 11:57:45AM -0500, Brian West wrote: > It actually CAN but because someone was lazy and didn't want to > actually do the work to make it possible to do a full change during a > reload. The biggest issue is ztcfg would have to be absorbed into > chan_zap to make it 100%

Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Brian West
It actually CAN but because someone was lazy and didn't want to actually do the work to make it possible to do a full change during a reload. The biggest issue is ztcfg would have to be absorbed into chan_zap to make it 100% possible. In fact if Digium wanted to make Asterisk easier to co

Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Vincent
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:23:03 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >chan_zap cannot change signalling of a channel on reload. So that >parameter is ignored on reload. > >False warning... OK. So to check that Zaptel is correctly configured, I can just type "zap show channels" in the CLI.

Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Vincent
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:59:49 -0400, "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I believe that by reloading without restarting asterisk doesnt reload >the signalling part Thanks for the help. I did read this somewhere, so I typed "stop now" in the CLI, followed by "safe_asterisk", "asterisk -r", and "reload

Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 04:27:17PM +0200, Vincent wrote: > ubuntu*CLI> reload chan_zap.so > -- Reloading module 'chan_zap.so' (Zapata Telephony) > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found > [Oct 21 16:22:37] WARNING[8240]: chan_zap.c:11120 process_zap: > Ignoring signalling chan_zap ca

Re: [asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread C F
I believe that by reloading without restarting asterisk doesnt reload the signalling part On 10/21/07, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I've been googling for this message, but can't find why > Asterisk sends a warning. The configuration files look similar to > http://www.voip-

[asterisk-users] WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling

2007-10-21 Thread Vincent
Hello I've been googling for this message, but can't find why Asterisk sends a warning. The configuration files look similar to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+config+zapata.conf.sample It's a TDM card with just one FXO module on it, and I connected an RJ11 cable to