On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 04:46 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:35:46 -0500
> From: Steve Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Which Java FastAGI implementation has
> the most"market share"?
> To:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:05 -0500, Steve Prior wrote:
>
> Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> >
> > The real advantage in choosing an AGI (or CGI or ...) platform/language
> > is *reusing* the existing code that already runs on that platform, with
>
> Well of course you should pick whatever AGI impl
Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
The real advantage in choosing an AGI (or CGI or ...) platform/language
is *reusing* the existing code that already runs on that platform, with
Well of course you should pick whatever AGI implementation matches the
rest of your environment best.
minimal
Kate Kretz wrote:
Steve, keep me in touch please ?
We are also looking for moving all our activities to java platform.
Let me know if You'll find/test something like asterisk2billing written
in java ?
I haven't received any feedback at all on the relative use of the java
options, but I'm pret
Steve, keep me in touch please ?
We are also looking for moving all our activities to java platform.
Let me know if You'll find/test something like asterisk2billing written in
java ?
Cheers,
Kate
On 2/1/07, Steve Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I was looking for a Java FastAGI interface
When I was looking for a Java FastAGI interface for Asterisk I came
across asterisk-java first and didn't realize there was more than one
out there. It seems to work fine and I've got my first project working
with it, but I was wondering which Java FastAGI implementation is the
most popular an
