Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
You guys all sound like you're talking about AstManProxy.
See:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=AstManProxy
I'm not saying it is the solution to your problem per se, but I can't
help but think
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system
On 5/18/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 4:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
-users] asterisk manager interface stability
Neat. So the clients use a polling model? Individual clients then
query only for events that are interesting?
Warm Regards,
Lee
Yes, the clients only connect to the MySQL database and can query the
events as they need
-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 6:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
On 5/18/07, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/18/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
Neat. So the clients use a polling model? Individual clients then
query only for events that are interesting?
Warm Regards,
Lee
Yes, the clients only connect to the MySQL database and can query the
events
Dean Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 4:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface
There are many past posts stating that AMI is not stable when multiple
client computers are allowed to connect, particularly when connections
are dropped.
Has much progress been made on this? Is it more stable now than in the
past?
As of what versions were these issues improved?
Is it
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon
Estep
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 7:32 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
There are many past posts stating that AMI is not stable when multiple
client computers are allowed
] *On Behalf Of *Damon Estep
*Sent:* Wednesday, 16 May 2007 7:32 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
There are many past posts stating that AMI is not stable when multiple
client computers are allowed to connect
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
There are many past posts stating that AMI is not stable when
multiple client computers are allowed to connect, particularly when
connections are dropped.
Has much progress been made
] asterisk manager interface stability
There are many past posts stating that AMI is not stable when
multiple client computers are allowed to connect, particularly when
connections are dropped.
Has much progress been made on this? Is it more stable now than in
the past?
As of what
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with
FreePBX/Trixbox especially generates vast amounts of output that
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 11:43, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with
Jenkins
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step
where sending of
Actions does not require an actual Telnet conneciton to the
AMI, but I
think to be able to handle larger numbers of concurrent
connections
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with
FreePBX/Trixbox
(352) 392-0171 Ext. 221
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lee Jenkins
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step
where sending of
Actions does not require
19 matches
Mail list logo
