Hi,
every two weeks the asterisk process has a segfault. Any idea whats reason or
what I can do...
thanks
pc kernel: [1780743.239296] asterisk[11362]: segfault at 0 ip (null)
sp 7f1e396b04a8 error 14
version is debian jessie
Asterisk 11.13.1~dfsg-2+b1 built by buildd @ brahms on
You'll want to follow these instructions to get a backtrace:
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+a+Backtrace
And then create an issue here and attach the backtrace file:
https://issues.asterisk.org
This way the Asterisk team will have the best chance of being able to
locate and
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Thomas wrote:
Hello,
in Squeeze Asterisk 1.8.23.1 is installed,
Self-installed
in Wheezy older version
1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7u3.
From a package.
With version 1.8.13.1 I have some problems so I would like to install version
1.8.23.1 used in
Hello,
in Squeeze Asterisk 1.8.23.1 is installed, in Wheezy older version
1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7u3.
With version 1.8.13.1 I have some problems so I would like to install version
1.8.23.1 used in Squeeze whats running fine for me.
How I can do this?
thanks for help
Thomas
--
On 18/04/2012 6:39 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 04/17/2012 06:17 AM, Larry Moore wrote:
The send log you have posted does not show any outgoing T.38 packets
from your system.
I set up a test build of 1.8.11.0 using the patch recently released, I
have difficulties sending T.38 with this
Hi,
Il 18/04/2012 00:39, Kevin P. Fleming ha scritto:
You guys know that it works in Asterisk 10, but you say you can't use
Asterisk 10 for some reason that I don't understand.
1) No Debian packages for v10. If you have to maintain lots of servers,
installing from sources is a big burden.
On 04/18/2012 06:08 AM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Hi,
Il 18/04/2012 00:39, Kevin P. Fleming ha scritto:
You guys know that it works in Asterisk 10, but you say you can't use
Asterisk 10 for some reason that I don't understand.
1) No Debian packages for v10. If you have to maintain lots of
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
This is a valid point, and we'll get this corrected. Our package
repository should have packages for Asterisk 10, but it doesn't.
How likely is it that a Centos 6 repo might be setup at the same time?
--
On 04/18/2012 11:23 AM, Dan Austin wrote:
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
This is a valid point, and we'll get this corrected. Our package
repository should have packages for Asterisk 10, but it doesn't.
How likely is it that a Centos 6 repo might be setup at the same time?
It's on our list, but
Il 18/04/2012 14:50, Kevin P. Fleming ha scritto:
Do you expect Debian-style packages to include these third-party
components in Asterisk? If you are talking about DAHDI specifically,
moving to Asterisk 10 does not change DAHDI requirements at all.
No, I just pointed out that upgrading to a
Il 18/04/2012 14:50, Kevin P. Fleming ha scritto:
we'll get this corrected
That's an awesome news indeed.
Niccolò
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live
Il 17/04/2012 01:10, Niccolò Belli ha scritto:
Tomorrow I will try without directmedia=yes.
Unfortunately it didn't help.
Niccolò
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk?
The send log you have posted does not show any outgoing T.38 packets
from your system.
I set up a test build of 1.8.11.0 using the patch recently released, I
have difficulties sending T.38 with this patch, in fact I cannot send
successfully however I can receive. I did however observe some
On 04/17/2012 06:17 AM, Larry Moore wrote:
The send log you have posted does not show any outgoing T.38 packets
from your system.
I set up a test build of 1.8.11.0 using the patch recently released, I
have difficulties sending T.38 with this patch, in fact I cannot send
successfully however I
On 04/14/2012 07:33 AM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 04/04/2012 07:45, Anton Kvashenkin ha scritto:
Check it out, thank you.
You're welcome.
New packages against dahdi-linux-2.6.0, dahdi-tools-2.6.0, libpri
1.4.12+svn20120409 and spandsp-0.0.6~pre20:
I applied the patch to my 1.8.11.0 build and observed the same error as
shown in you t38_send.log.
I have maintained a private patch file for this functionality and
reverted to it when I too observed the INTERNAL_OBJ: user_data is NULL
message.
Do you have directmedia=no in your SIP
Hi,
Il 16/04/2012 22:50, Larry Moore ha scritto:
Do you have directmedia=no in your SIP configuration?
Yes I have.
Niccolò
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us
Perhaps your problem may be that Asterisk doesn't like to send T.38 to a
peer other than the one it negotiates the SIP connection with.
If I recall correctly you mentioned a while back that eutelia made a
change which broke your outgoing T.38 functionality, did you ever find
out what the
Hi,
If someone is interested I made Debian Squeeze Packages:
http://www.linuxsystems.it/2012/04/asterisk-1-8-11-0-debian-squeeze-packages-with-t-38-gateway-queue-hints-and-fixed-rfc4235/
Niccolò
Il 30/03/2012 17:22, Niccolò Belli ha scritto:
Check it out, thank you.
3 апреля 2012 г. 20:27 пользователь Niccolò Belli darkba...@linuxsystems.it
написал:
Hi,
If someone is interested I made Debian Squeeze Packages:
http://www.linuxsystems.it/**2012/04/asterisk-1-8-11-0-**
debian-squeeze-packages-with-**t-38-gateway-queue-hints-and-**
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:30:52PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
hello people,
I am running v1.8.4.2 on debian squeeze on a sparc platform...and for some
reason I have noticed that only after a few test calls, the asterisk process
is running between 95% - 99.9% CPU when there's absolutely
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:30:52PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
hello people,
I am running v1.8.4.2 on debian squeeze on a sparc platform...and for
some
reason I have noticed that only after a few test calls, the
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:15:26AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:30:52PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
hello people,
I am running v1.8.4.2 on debian squeeze on a sparc platform...and for
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:15:26AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:30:52PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
hello
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:11:26AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:15:26AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
- when I'd run an strace on the PID of the offending thread it just rolled
some message
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:11:26AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:15:26AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
- when
hello people,
I am running v1.8.4.2 on debian squeeze on a sparc platform...and for some
reason I have noticed that only after a few test calls, the asterisk process
is running between 95% - 99.9% CPU when there's absolutely nothing on the
system. This is a clean Asterisk system in an internal
On the CLI write: sip show channels
If there are lots of bye channels you have the same problem than me.
I've tried waiting with the call generator -sipp- and channels
finished when there are a few. But they're not ending faster enough
when I send lots of concurrent calls.
Elder
2011/7/5, A E
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Daniel - Asterisk earohua...@gmail.comwrote:
On the CLI write: sip show channels
If there are lots of bye channels you have the same problem than me.
I've tried waiting with the call generator -sipp- and channels
finished when there are a few. But they're not
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Debian / Sparc taking up 95%+ CPU
with No calls on the system
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Daniel - Asterisk earohua...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the CLI write: sip show channels
If there are lots of bye channels you have the same
and
see what happens
**
*From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *A E [Gmail]
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 06, 2011 9:50 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users
Thanks Dave. Sounds like a man who's not had his hand soaking in ivory
liquid and been through the toils and tortures of various upgrades over the
years. Very insightful though. Goof thing this discussion ensued as I am
learning a lot about what to be wary of not least of all, the truth about
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Dave. Sounds like a man who's not had his hand soaking in ivory
liquid and been through the toils and tortures of various upgrades over
the
years. Very insightful though. Goof thing this discussion ensued as I
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 01:09 -0500, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Paul Belanger
pabelan...@digium.com wrote:
On 11-01-23 10:24 PM, RR wrote:
email from Kevin Flemming talking about =2.6.27 so thought
I'd ask esp. coz
I have 2.6.26-2 yet I don't
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Stelios Koroneos
skoron...@digital-opsis.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 01:09 -0500, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Paul Belanger
pabelan...@digium.com wrote:
On 11-01-23 10:24 PM, RR wrote:
email from Kevin Flemming
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:58:45AM -0500, RR wrote:
In the meantime, does anyone have a nice way to update a stable/stock lenny
installation with the updated glibc as well as the latest kernel
At this point the easiest option will be to upgrade to squeeze.
R
--
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Roger Burton West ro...@firedrake.orgwrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:58:45AM -0500, RR wrote:
In the meantime, does anyone have a nice way to update a stable/stock
lenny
installation with the updated glibc as well as the latest kernel
At this point the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:56 AM, RR ranjt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Roger Burton West
ro...@firedrake.orgwrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:58:45AM -0500, RR wrote:
In the meantime, does anyone have a nice way to update a stable/stock
lenny
installation with the
On 01/24/2011 07:29 AM, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:56 AM, RR ranjt...@gmail.com
mailto:ranjt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Roger Burton West
ro...@firedrake.org mailto:ro...@firedrake.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:58:45AM -0500, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.comwrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:29 AM, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:56 AM, RR ranjt...@gmail.com
mailto:ranjt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Roger Burton West
ro...@firedrake.org
In the meantime, does anyone have a nice way to update a stable/stock lenny
installation with the updated glibc as well as the latest kernel
Scary and risky, as others have noted!
There is an official backports release kit associated with Debian,
which contains newer versions of many packages
On 01/24/2011 12:46 PM, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
mailto:kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:29 AM, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:56 AM, RR ranjt...@gmail.com
mailto:ranjt...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.comwrote:
On 01/24/2011 12:46 PM, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
mailto:kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:29 AM, RR wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at
I know this is an {*} list but does anyone know if simply adding the Squeeze
repository to my sources.lst and running an 'aptitude
upgrade/safe-upgrade/full-upgrade will just upgrade Lenny - Squeeze
without me having to rebuild the system from scratch?
In my experience: you're likely to run
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Dave Platt dpl...@radagast.org wrote:
I know this is an {*} list but does anyone know if simply adding the
Squeeze
repository to my sources.lst and running an 'aptitude
upgrade/safe-upgrade/full-upgrade will just upgrade Lenny - Squeeze
without me having
Hello All,
I'm sure this has been talked about and based on some searching of archives,
I'd discovered that to be able to use timerfd, one needs to have a kernel
version =2.6.27? Is this true?
If yes, then is there anyone who's got it working in Lenny 5.0.7? Do I need
to download and build the
On 11-01-23 10:01 PM, RR wrote:
I'm sure this has been talked about and based on some searching of archives,
I'd discovered that to be able to use timerfd, one needs to have a kernel
version =2.6.27? Is this true?
Kernel version 2.6.25 or newer, as documented in CHANGES.
--
Paul Belanger
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.comwrote:
On 11-01-23 10:01 PM, RR wrote:
I'm sure this has been talked about and based on some searching of
archives,
I'd discovered that to be able to use timerfd, one needs to have a kernel
version =2.6.27? Is this true?
On 11-01-23 10:24 PM, RR wrote:
email from Kevin Flemming talking about =2.6.27 so thought I'd ask esp. coz
I have 2.6.26-2 yet I don't think I have timerfd on my machine...and I see,
the following
If you read CHANGES, you will also see you kernel 2.6.25+ *and* glibc
2.8+. Lenny ships with
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.comwrote:
On 11-01-23 10:24 PM, RR wrote:
email from Kevin Flemming talking about =2.6.27 so thought I'd ask esp.
coz
I have 2.6.26-2 yet I don't think I have timerfd on my machine...and I
see,
the following
If you read
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.comwrote:
On 11-01-23 10:24 PM, RR wrote:
email from Kevin Flemming talking about =2.6.27 so thought I'd ask esp.
coz
I have 2.6.26-2 yet I don't think I have timerfd on my machine...and I
see,
the following
If you read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone know of any Asterisk 1.8 deb's available or when they might be
included in backports or (hopefully) Squeeze?
I can compile from source... but would much rather have a pre-packaged
binary if one exists...
Thanks,
Stephen
-BEGIN PGP
Hi!
Asterisk in Debian/Lenny claims to be bristuffed, not? At least the
the Debian patch tracking system shows the bristuff-patches:
[1] http://bit.ly/bRRHe7
We have a QuadBRI-Card and recently needed support from Junghanns.net
but they refused telling us there is no bristuff installed because
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 07:45:34PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
Hi!
Asterisk in Debian/Lenny claims to be bristuffed, not? At least the
the Debian patch tracking system shows the bristuff-patches:
[1] http://bit.ly/bRRHe7
We have a QuadBRI-Card and recently needed support from
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:24, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Well, I can't speak for anybody else, but I haven't had a problem with
reproducing a source install.
How about time?
2 minutes download+install, vs 10-20 minutes compilation. Then, how do you
uninstall? How do you know which version do you
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:24, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Well, I can't speak for anybody else, but I haven't had a problem with
reproducing a source install.
How about time?
2 minutes download+install, vs 10-20 minutes compilation.
Then, how do you
uninstall? How do
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:24, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Well, I can't speak for anybody else, but I haven't had a problem with
reproducing a source install.
How about time?
2 minutes download+install, vs 10-20 minutes compilation.
Then,
Stephen Bosch wrote:
My Linux servers started working the day I stopped wasting my time with
packages, idiotic package dependency chains and hardware
incompatibilities with binaries and learned how to install from sources.
And no, I'm not a developer (nor am I a rocket scientist, though I do
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:23:19AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:24, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Well, I can't speak for anybody else, but I haven't had a problem with
reproducing a source install.
How about time?
2 minutes download+install,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:36:25PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
He is better off installing from sources, and more likely to get
something that performs as it should.
Source installs are not complicated -- even when you are using zaptel.
But why do all the extra work,
hello,
I have two new cards, one is A400P01 from OpenVox and the other is a BILLION
ISDN.
I have Debian Etch installed.
I want install this packages:
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-1.2.17.tar.gz
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/releases/zaptel-1.2.16.tar.gz
you need to use apt-get install asterisk.
If you MUST HAVE 1.217 or your cats die, there are repositories available. For
example, read this: http://www.buildserver.net/
If you still MUST build asterisk yourself, I wish you good luck.
On Monday 23 April 2007 13:29, Josu Lazkano Lete wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 12:29:53PM +0200, Josu Lazkano Lete wrote:
hello,
I have two new cards, one is A400P01 from OpenVox and the other is a BILLION
ISDN.
I have Debian Etch installed.
I want install this packages:
Monday, April 23, 2007, 12:44:08 PM, Diego wrote:
you need to use apt-get install asterisk.
If you MUST HAVE 1.217 or your cats die, there are repositories available.
For
example, read this: http://www.buildserver.net/
If you still MUST build asterisk yourself, I wish you good luck.
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
you need to use apt-get install asterisk.
If you MUST HAVE 1.217 or your cats die, there are repositories available.
For
example, read this: http://www.buildserver.net/
If you still MUST build asterisk yourself, I wish you good luck.
This kind of commentary isn't
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:36:25PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
you need to use apt-get install asterisk.
If you MUST HAVE 1.217 or your cats die, there are repositories available.
For
example, read this: http://www.buildserver.net/
If you still MUST build
hello friends,
I want to install Asterisk on a Debian machine.
I need to download the sources or just with apt-get install is enought???
thanks___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
On 3/20/07, Josu Lazkano Lete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello friends,
I want to install Asterisk on a Debian machine.
I need to download the sources or just with apt-get install is enought???
Depends on the version you want to install. You can install with apt-get
install asterisk, of
On 3/20/07, Josu Lazkano Lete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to install Asterisk on a Debian machine.
I need to download the sources or just with apt-get install is enought???
It depends on what version do you want to use. In sarge is only the
version 1.0.7. In etch is 1.2.13, but the 1.2
Josu Lazkano Lete wrote:
I need to download the sources or just with apt-get install is
enought???
apt-get is the easiest way, but won't give you the latest release.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josu Lazkano
Lete
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:58 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk on debian
hello friends,
I want to install Asterisk on a Debian machine.
I need to download the sources or just
Hi Josu,
I've done it both ways, and they both generally work equally well (so long
as the package maintainers are doing a decent job). As Victor mentioned
though, the version you wish to install plays a factor in this. I found the
Asterisk build in the repos to be a bit out dated.
Also, it's
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:11:34AM +0100, Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
I'm using 1.2.13~dfsg-2 from Debian unstable in a small SOHO
environment, it's doing its job.
However, the startup scripts seem to hose something and it's running but
not working with
Hello,
are there any (possibly experimental) asterisk debian packages (or at
least a debian/ directory to build our own)?
Previously I used to modify debian/ directory from earlier version,
but 1.4 changed build process, so this is not that easy.
Thank you,
Juraj.
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:16:07PM +0100, Juraj Bednar wrote:
Hello,
are there any (possibly experimental) asterisk debian packages (or at
least a debian/ directory to build our own)?
Previously I used to modify debian/ directory from earlier version,
but 1.4 changed build process, so
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk from Debian Packages
You can run Asterisk 1.2 in sarge using the packages in backports.
Just add:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main contrib
non-free
to /etc/apt/sources.list
then apt-get update
Carlos Navarro wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:54:10 -0500
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run etch before it is released as stable, you might run into
problems that are over your head. I have run into a few that weren't
over my head but they were very inconvenient.
Yes Paul, I'm
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:54:10 -0500
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run etch before it is released as stable, you might run into
problems that are over your head. I have run into a few that weren't
over my head but they were very inconvenient.
Yes Paul, I'm running 2 etch with asterisk,
You can run Asterisk 1.2 in sarge using the packages in backports.
Just add:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main contrib non-free
to /etc/apt/sources.list
then apt-get update
and then apt-get -t sarge-backports install asterisk
(you can also pin-priority asterisk's
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:16:45PM +0800, Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Matt wrote:
Looks like you need to install the kernel headers package. While you
are at it be sure that you have the kernel source package installed
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Matt wrote:
Looks like you need to install the kernel headers package. While you
are at it be sure that you have the kernel source package installed also.
apt-get install kernel-headers-`uname -r`
should suffice.
Dear Collegues
I am trying to compile the new version (Asterisk.1.2) with my debian
box and i get the following error when i compile the zaptel package:
radio:/usr/src/asterisk-1.2/zaptel-1.2.0# make
make: Warning: File `Makefile' has modification time 3.1e+08 s in the future
cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall
Looks like you need to install the kernel headers package. While you
are at it be sure that you have the kernel source package installed also.
my $0.02
Juanjo Portela wrote:
Dear Collegues
I am trying to compile the new version (Asterisk.1.2) with my debian
box and i get the following
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Matt wrote:
Looks like you need to install the kernel headers package. While you
are at it be sure that you have the kernel source package installed also.
apt-get install kernel-headers-`uname -r`
should suffice.
my $0.02
Juanjo Portela
Hello,
Fresh install of Debian Sarge and asterisk from the debian archives.
Asterisk doesn't start and dies with the following message.
[chan_capi.so] = (Common ISDN API for Asterisk)
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk/capi.conf': Found
Apr 13 15:38:44 NOTICE[1580]: chan_capi.c:2635 load_module: CAPI
Title: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on debian sarge doesn't start with CAPI module errors
Hello,
Apt-get update apt-get upgrade fixed it
Must have been an issue with that packaged version.
Thanks
~sm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk
: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on debian sarge doesn't start with
CAPImodule errors
Hello,
Fresh install of Debian Sarge and asterisk from the debian archives.
Asterisk doesn't start and dies with the following message.
[chan_capi.so] = (Common ISDN API for Asterisk)
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk
Hi list,
Does anyone use the .deb package of asterisk? Is it stable? woks fine?
thanks
Eduardo
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
88 matches
Mail list logo
