Hi Moy,
thank you for your answer and this new testasync2.diff. It matches better my
mind about the subject.
I tried it out and it worked fine. The execution went right this time, as
you can see at bottom this mail.
A last question: would you apply this fix to
asterisk-async-AGI-rev92324.patch
Hi Moy,
¡Great, it works! Thanks ever so much.
But, I don't understand anything. I mean:
The only difference I can see between this testasync.diff and your last
asterisk-1.4.18-async-agi.patch is at the lines:
returnstatus |= agi_handle_command(chan, &async_agi, cmd->cmd_buffer);
if ((returnstat
Ok, that makes more sense. Try this new patch and let me know how it
goes, once you confirm it works I will post it in my blog with a
better name.
http://moythreads.com/testasync.diff
Moy
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:52 AM, wrote:
> Hi Moy,
> You are right. I failed applying the patch. In fact,
Hi Moy,
You are right. I failed applying the patch. In fact, I applied it but I didn't
"make install" so I started a wrong asterisk. I apologize, it was my mistake.
This time I made sure twice before getting the logs and this time the log
message you said appears, but it doesn't work either as y
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:59 AM, wrote:
> Hi Moy,
>
> thanks a lot for your fix, but I'm afraid it doesn't work. I looked your
> patch over and I realize the code never passes by neither of the two lines
> you added with "returnstatus = AGI_RESULT_HANGUP". Even, it seems the
> execution doesn'
Hi Moy,
thanks a lot for your fix, but I'm afraid it doesn't work. I looked your patch
over and I realize the code never passes by neither of the two lines you added
with "returnstatus = AGI_RESULT_HANGUP". Even, it seems the execution doesn't
pass by res_agi.c at all, or at least, it doesn't p
It's a bug in the Async AGI feature. I have created a new patch
http://www.moythreads.com/asterisk-1.4.18-async-agi.patch
Please test it and let me know if it works for you,
Moy
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Moises Silva wrote:
> "Released" means no patching needed, it means it was tested an
"Released" means no patching needed, it means it was tested and put
into Asterisk tree. So, I published a patch for 1.4 so it could be
used in 1.4 however the feature per se was just released for Asterisk
1.6.
Moy
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, wrote:
> Moy,
> I apologize if you felt under so
Moy,
I apologize if you felt under some pressure. It wasn't my mind. I only wanted
to know if either there was a mistake in my configuration, or I was failing in
the procedure, or it was a bug, as you said, in order to move forward.
By the way, there's a thing I don't understand:
In your blog a
You have to understand that this mailing list is not free instant
support. Even more, you are using an unsupported Asterisk feature for
1.4. I will check it when I have some spare time to try to reproduce
and fix it. If you are too much in a hurry you can always contact me
off-list for paid support
Hi,
I was asked for the patch and I sent it. Does anybody have any news about
this subject?
I'm willing to try a fix for 1.4 but I'd need any guidelines to do it.
Thanks in advanced
Jose
2009/4/2 Moises Silva
> Async AGI was never released for Asterisk 1.4.X, so probably the patch
> you used has
Yes, I have the patch around here. I think it's the one you said at
http://www.moythreads.com/wordpress/2007/12/24/asterisk-asynchronous-agi/
Due to the res_agi patch excedes the size limit for this mailing list,
(40Kb) I wasn't able to attach it on this post, so you can find it at
http://docs.goo
Async AGI was never released for Asterisk 1.4.X, so probably the patch
you used has a bug or something, do you still have the patch around?
Moy
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:44 AM, wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> I would like to do the same thing you are doing here. I want to implement an
> external queue
Hi Henrik,
I would like to do the same thing you are doing here. I want to implement an
external queue functionality so I need to stop a play file launched previously
with an async agi command on caller's channel, sending the call to agent's
extension.
I'm redirecting caller's channel with RED
Thanks, I was not familiar with this application.
/Henrik
Kevin P. Fleming skrev:
Henrik Westerberg wrote:
Yes, this works good for me. A StopIO feature would of course be cleaner
but this certainly does the trick.
The ExternalIVR interface, while not quite as featur
Henrik Westerberg wrote:
> Yes, this works good for me. A StopIO feature would of course be cleaner
> but this certainly does the trick.
The ExternalIVR interface, while not quite as feature-filled as AGI,
does in fact work in a true non-blocking fashion, and supports exactly
what you are looking
Hi Moy,
Thank you for your quick answer. Also thanks for implementing the great
async agi functionality!
Yes, this works good for me. A StopIO feature would of course be
cleaner but this certainly does the trick.
Regards,
Henrik
Moises Silva skrev:
Hello Henrik,
I have not used Aster
Hello Henrik,
I have not used Asterisk from a user perspective lately, but, when I
added the async agi functionality, I used to control this using a
"manager redirect" action to the same priority where the channel calls
async agi, that will work like a break that re-enters the async agi
loop . Thi
Hi,
I am developing asterisk support for our application using the Async AGI
and Asterisk-Java.
One thing I haven't been able to implement is how to stop playing a
sound. Something similar to StopIO for Dialogic GlobalCall or
DivaStopSending for Eicon.
Is there any way to achieve this today which
19 matches
Mail list logo
