John:
> However, that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be implemented. This is
> an area in which I think there is a disproportionate amount of "non-
> discussion", since many people who would use or be interested in MRCP
> simply don't participate in the Asterisk project because it doesn't
> meet t
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Erik (Caneris) wrote:
>>
>> Erik -
>> Have you found RealSpeak to be worth the cost?
>>
> Actually my last note was probably a bit misleading because in the
> particular cases I mentioned RealSpeak, the platform wasn't Asterisk
> and Cepstral wasn't even on the r