[asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements

2008-02-21 Thread Bruce McAlister
Hi All, I would just like to clarify the requirements of the h323 channel within asterisk. Can I use a recent edition of PTLib and OpenH323, for example, the editions located at OpenH323+: http://www.h323plus.org/source/ OpenH323+ v1.20.2 PTLib v2.0.1 Or do I need to use the versions at the

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements

2008-02-21 Thread Mindaugas Kezys
://www.kolmisoft.com MOR PRO - Advanced Billing for Asterisk PBX -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce McAlister Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:58 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements Hi All, I

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements

2008-02-21 Thread Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI)
Hello, To compile chan_h323 as is distributed you need to download OpenH323 v1.18.0 and PwLib v1.10.0 from: http://www.voxgratia.org Some months ago I had made a patch to compile the 1.4.x version and the trunk version (which evolved to 1.6.x) with H323+. Sadly, the patch was not included in

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements

2008-02-21 Thread Bruce McAlister
] On Behalf Of Bruce McAlister Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:58 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements Hi All, I would just like to clarify the requirements of the h323 channel within asterisk. Can I use a recent edition of PTLib

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements

2008-02-21 Thread Bruce McAlister
Hi, Thank you for the details of which versions to get. I will be building these two versions on Solaris to test chan_h323. Did your patch for building with OpenH323+ make it into the 1.4 edition of Asterisk? Thanks Bruce Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) wrote: Hello, To compile chan_h323 as is

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_h323 requirements

2008-02-21 Thread Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI)
Hello Bruce, Bruce McAlister wrote: Did your patch for building with OpenH323+ make it into the 1.4 edition of Asterisk? No, it didn't as it was considered a new feature and by Digium's policy new features can only be added in the trunk versions. The strange thing is that I added it in