Hello,
Does the ENUM service e164.org died? All queries that I do lead to
"NXDOMAIN". I feel that the base has simply been empty for several
months. Maybe some old addresses are still resolved, but the newer
ones are not.
The website still works, but it seems that everyone has left the
plane,
Recently, I've been having issues with the URIs returned from e.164.org and
toll free calls. It seems that the URIs that are returned from ENUMQUERY and
ENUMRESULT are no longer the proper numbering schemes that the poviders use.
I've been using the following [enum] template in my outbound
On 00:36, Sun 30 Mar 08, Armin Schindler wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Grey Man wrote:
Does anyone know if the e164.org ENUM service is still active?
If anyone who has anything to do with the e164.org ENUM site monitors
this list could you check your signup page as the Captcha's (the test
Does anyone know if the e164.org ENUM service is still active?
If anyone who has anything to do with the e164.org ENUM site monitors
this list could you check your signup page as the Captcha's (the test
to see if you are human) fails for both the text and audio tests every
time. I'd post a
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Grey Man wrote:
Does anyone know if the e164.org ENUM service is still active?
If anyone who has anything to do with the e164.org ENUM site monitors
this list could you check your signup page as the Captcha's (the test
to see if you are human) fails for both the text and
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
FYI: FWD shows a different inbound prefix:
**164 e164.org8781039311
Yes that works as well, and was issued by another company, the contact
at FWD asked if we could route that to them as well, I prefer the other
range because it's shorter and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duane) writes:
There is now a peering arrangement between e164.org and FreeWorldDialup
which means any and all subscribers on FWD are now easily able to make
enum calls by prefixing their call with **164, like wise it's almost as
simple to make a call to FWD by hitting
There is now a peering arrangement between e164.org and FreeWorldDialup
which means any and all subscribers on FWD are now easily able to make
enum calls by prefixing their call with **164, like wise it's almost as
simple to make a call to FWD by hitting 8829990fwd number
This means that for
Long time coming, but we finally have a 3rd party interface on the
website to add block of enum numbers in regex form...
eg
+4412345[678]
which will match
+44123456
+44123457
+44123458
also
+4412345[16-18]
which will match
+441234516
+441234517
+441234518
or just short prefixes
+4412345
so
Firstly we've setup a SIP proxy that uses e164.org to do enum lookups,
also rather then issuing people with yet more numbers they have to
remember we've coded up a watered down version of e164.org for people
that would just like to have a single SIP phone rather then run their
own PABX.
configure your asterisk to use e164.org and make use of EnumLookup
then try to call +352 818 595, if your call goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then you can call me for free over the net!
Marc
At 03:33 23.05.2004, you wrote:
Dean Collins wrote:
Tony, as per you inference that e164 are up to
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Yes, same Duane as CAcert.org...
So eg. if I've registered 3 different sip providers and an IAX provider,
plus a couple of landlines what
is it doing? I guess I'm missing the point somewhere.
The point is as simple or as complex as you like it to be. You can
configure things
Duane wrote:
If there is an IAX2 or SIP or H323 NAPTR record in DNS, this increments
the dial plan by +1, if it's a TEL (i.e. the talking clock in china) it
increments by +51, and increments by +101 if it fails, so unless you
tell it to dial the number at +51 it won't use any TEL fields from
Tony Hoyle wrote:
That helps (at least until VOIP calls start being charged by the
minute). Maybe someone needs to implement a switch/case statement in
extensions.conf for this kind of stuff at some point.
Already exists, the examples on the website if a TEL field is hit they
just drop out and
On Sun, 23 May 2004, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Simon Dorfman wrote:
I wonder if someone can help me understand this. Let's say I configure my
asterisk box to use e164 and then I try to call a phone number in Germany.
I'm in the U.S.A. So if the number I'm calling in Germany is registered in
So I just saw this VoIP-centric article at slashdot
(http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/22/1840220) which mentions
e164.org. It's a non-profit public DNS root designed to map phone numbers
to Internet protocols. Is anyone on this list actually using this?
They have asterisk config
Simon Dorfman wrote:
I wonder if someone can help me understand this. Let's say I configure my
asterisk box to use e164 and then I try to call a phone number in Germany.
I'm in the U.S.A. So if the number I'm calling in Germany is registered in
e164's dns, would my call be routed directly via
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 18:08, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Simon Dorfman wrote:
I wonder if someone can help me understand this. Let's say I configure my
asterisk box to use e164 and then I try to call a phone number in Germany.
I'm in the U.S.A. So if the number I'm calling in Germany is
Dean Collins wrote:
Tony, as per you inference that e164 are up to something shady, you
should talk to one of the founders Duane, he currently has about 5 open
If it's the same duane who runs cacert he probably means well... however
having read the site I'm still not sure whether i'd use it
Matthew Asham wrote:
; north america enum
exten = _1NX,1,Playback(doing-enum-lookup)
exten = _1NX,2,EnumLookup(${EXTEN})
exten = _1NX,3,BackGround(enum-lookup-successful)
exten = _1NX,4,Dial(${ENUM},30,tr)
exten = _1NX,5,Hangup
exten =
You know, sleep deprivation cause people to do dumb things. The example
I pasted was hastily pasted and renumbered,
exten = _1NX,6,Playback(enum-lookup-failed)
exten = _1NX,7,Hangup
are actually:
exten = _1NX,103,Playback(enum-lookup-failed)
exten =
You forgot to allow for tel: N+51
bkw
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Asham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] e164.org
You know, sleep deprivation cause people to do dumb things. The example
I pasted
'local' target? What's that?
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Asham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] e164.org
You know, sleep deprivation cause people to do dumb things. The example
I pasted was hastily
Hoyle
Sent: Sunday, 23 May 2004 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] e164.org
Dean Collins wrote:
Tony, as per you inference that e164 are up to something shady, you
should talk to one of the founders Duane, he currently has about 5
open
If it's the same duane who runs
Billy Huddleston wrote:
'local' target? What's that?
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+local+channels
It's like a subroutine, so you can use it to call bits of the dial plan
that get repeated a lot, like dialing FWD after first setting the caller ID.
(AFAIK anyway... not tried to get them
Dean Collins wrote:
Hi Tony, it is the same duane - lol you are hardly allowing it to
perform least cost routing, it just does one check for ip to ip call
then drops back to whatever you have written on your asterisk.
So eg. if I've registered 3 different sip providers and an IAX provider,
plus a
26 matches
Mail list logo
