Eric Wieling aka ManxPower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Selleck wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, passing no audio from
the called channel(s) until one answers. Use with
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 18:06 +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Selleck wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, passing no
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, passing no audio from
the called channel(s) until one answers. Use with care and don't insert
this by default into all your dial statements as you are killing call
progress
Justin Selleck wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
**---***
***Justin Selleck***
***Network Engineer***
***Smooth Fusion, Inc.***
http://www.smoothfusion.com
LOL. Look even more, and you'll find it funny.
On 8/10/05, Justin Selleck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
---
Justin Selleck
Network
That was an April Fools Day joke...unfortunately whoever started it
didn't think about what it would do to the Archive.
Justin Selleck wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but
cannot find it anywhere.
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
You must be referring to this post :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-April/098601.html
Please note the date of the posting, and this particular phrase in it
: Asterisk 2.0 was
Justin Selleck wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
No. It's not out. 1.2 isn't even out. And thank god its NOT programmed
in C#.
-Matthew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
That announcement was an Aprol Fools Joke. There is no Asterisk 2.0
Justin Selleck wrote:
Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot
find it anywhere.
--
Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-210-3699 x2120
r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party,
John Novack wrote:
An even BETTER question is: When will what is already out and more or
less working have enough accurate documentation to make it acceptable to
a wider audience?
Once more people start contributing.
As one small example: the recent postings regarding wctdm. If all the
options
Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one
does beg to ask.
When will version 2.0 be released???
James
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
James Gardiner wrote:
Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one
does beg to ask.
When will version 2.0 be released???
2.0 is just now really being talked about in earnest.
I think a better question would be when 1.2 is going to be out.
That one has more narrow
Brian Capouch wrote:
James Gardiner wrote:
Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but
one
does beg to ask.
When will version 2.0 be released???
2.0 is just now really being talked about in earnest.
I think a better question would be when 1.2 is going to be out.
An even
, 3 April 2005 5:15 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now
James Gardiner wrote:
Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one
does beg to ask.
When will version 2.0
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
During the developer's conference call yesterday evening,
it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited
Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called codename AAFJ.
AAFJ as in Asterisk April Fool's Joke?
Nice :)
___
Good one guys, for a minute you actually had me there. The give away is:
Rumours has it that one developer actually ported the
Erlang runtime and executed an Ericsson AXE switch within
Asterisk.
:-)
Nir S
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 09:40 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
During the
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 09:40 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
During the developer's conference call yesterday evening,
it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited
Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called codename AAFJ.
This relaese is based on the hidden cvs that has been
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
* New source code structure - C# and .net
Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
Therefore, the code was quickly moved to C# on the
.net
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Chris Hills wrote:
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
* New source code structure - C# and .net
Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
Therefore, the code was
Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
It wasn't until I read this line that I knew it was a joke. I mean,
seriously, who associates Microsoft with stability and security? A fool,
that's who.
-Matthew
Hello, Olle!
OEJAsterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
OEJdemand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
Nice...
I remember that about 10 years ago, when I was working in a daily newspaper
we wrote and article on April 1st on a first page about scientific
On Friday 01 April 2005 02:40, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
During the developer's conference call yesterday evening,
it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited
Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called codename AAFJ.
Olle, you better take a break!
For the rest of you, good
-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now
On Friday 01 April 2005 02:40, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
During the developer's conference call yesterday evening,
it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited
Asterisk 2.0 Stable
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 09:39 -0500, steve szmidt wrote:
For the rest of you, good luck! You'll need it. I think finally the Danish
Elephant beer that is so strong has gone to Olle's head.
Oh yes Elephant beer, 30 years ago I drove from Stockholm to
Nortalia(sp?) after 3 or 4 bottles of that,
Remco Barende wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Chris Hills wrote:
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
* New source code structure - C# and .net
Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
Engineer
Planet Telecom, Inc.
Tampa, FL Office
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Hammett
Sent: Friday, 01 April, 2005 12:18
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:17:45AM -0600, Mike Hammett said:
Ya, I mean do you really think an open source community is gonna
acknowledge that MS can do anything right? of course not. THEY'RE THE
DEVIL!
(note, I will not respond to anything posted in reply to this, so don't
even try)
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now
Remco Barende wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Chris Hills wrote:
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
* New source code structure - C# and .net
Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due
-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:17:45AM -0600, Mike Hammett said:
Ya, I mean do you really think an open source community is gonna
acknowledge that MS can do anything right? of course not. THEY'RE THE
DEVIL!
(note, I will not respond to anything
The second I read .NET, C#, and Microsoft in the same
paragraph as the word Stability I knew it was an April
Fools. And that is because only a fool would associate the word
stable with anything Microshaft related.
At 03:01 AM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
During the developer's
--On Friday, April 01, 2005 3:47 AM -0600 Matthew Boehm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
It wasn't until I read this line that I knew it was a joke. I mean,
seriously, who
Un what is todays date?
W
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angel Diaz
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:31 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now
This version support SS7 -
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:50:45 -0700, Wiley Siler wrote
Un what is todays date?
You will have to excuse the people who live outside the USA that do not
know that April 1st is April Fools day as it is not an international thing.
--
Carlos Chavez
Director de Tecnología
Telecomunicaciones
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now
|
|
|
| On Friday 01 April 2005 02:40, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
|During the developer's conference call yesterday evening,
|it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited
34 matches
Mail list logo
