Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

>Matt, > >Before switching our system from the rawplayer method to native MOH, I >consulted Kevin Fleming. He said the impact on the system would be "not >much, more memory usage though." > > >Right now we have seventy ca

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

What's the spec of the box? Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Roth Sent: 03 April 2006 18:48 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123? Matt w

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

Matt wrote: > Ooo! Good point! Even though 100 instances of the same > mp3/wav/etc may be opened... linux really only has it opened 'once'. > Forgot about that :) Good point! And there aren't additional threads created for this either; the thread already servicing the channel handl

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

On 4/3/06, Matt Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt wrote: > > >>Right now we have seventy calls waiting in queues (all with native MOH) > >>and 120 calls connected to agents. The box is jumping between 50%-60% > >>idle. "ps auxm" shows 241 threads for Asterisk, but none of them take > >>more

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

Matt wrote: Right now we have seventy calls waiting in queues (all with native MOH) and 120 calls connected to agents. The box is jumping between 50%-60% idle. "ps auxm" shows 241 threads for Asterisk, but none of them take more than 0.8% CPU. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing an option that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

> Right now we have seventy calls waiting in queues (all with native MOH) > and 120 calls connected to agents. The box is jumping between 50%-60% > idle. "ps auxm" shows 241 threads for Asterisk, but none of them take > more than 0.8% CPU. > > Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing an option that all

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

Matt wrote: Ok.. see it... so now my question is which should I use? Obviously a hold system using ulaw for hold files is going to use less CPU, but is it more stable to have Asterisk playing the sound files? Especially since it has to start a seperate stream for every on hold person? Se

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

ehalf Of Matt Sent: 31 March 2006 22:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123? > > > And isn't mpg123 ( or some replacement ) required when using a stream > for MOH I couldn't

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

> > > And isn't mpg123 ( or some replacement ) required when using a stream > for MOH > I couldn't get streaming to work without it in 1.2? Yes.. mpg123 is required for streaming... I had it working in 1.0.9... though have not tried in 1.2. ___ --Bandwid

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.6 doesn't use mpg123?

Matt wrote: Is it true that asterisk 1.2.6 does not use mpg123? I just installed asterisk 1.2.6 and while I do have music on hold (through format_mp3?) I do not have an mpg123 process running. I seem to be having serious audio issues when going through one of my providers (and just through t