Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Does anyone know how to include a file in AEL using the
#include filename
syntax in .conf files?
Seems like
#include test.ael
works but
#include test.conf
does not.
Regards,
Philipp
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to include a file in AEL using the
#include filename
syntax in .conf files?
Yes, it is supported.
(Technically: It is not part of the ael syntax. #include and #exec are
preprocessing done before the
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to include a file in AEL using the
#include filename
syntax in .conf files?
Yes, it is supported.
(Technically: It is not part of the ael syntax. #include and #exec are
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 20:42 +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to include a file in AEL using the
#include filename
syntax in .conf files?
Yes, it is supported.
Correct.
Steve Murphy wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 20:42 +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to include a file in AEL using the
#include filename
syntax in .conf files?
Yes, it is supported.
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 22:21 +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Steve Murphy wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 20:42 +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to include a file in AEL using the
Thanks for the reply!
Steve Murphy wrote:
At Digium, for instance, we keep all our config files under
SVN, and the config
files are just #exec's for svn checkouts.
Nice.
Just one little mistake I hadn't pointed out earlier; the
extensions.conf would probably really be extensions.ael !
I use the goto to jump across contexts with labels all the time.
goto(context,exten,label). works for me.
Jason
Michael Collins wrote:
Oh Crud. So, if I want to jump to another extension or context, I have
to
specify the full context, extension and priority? I can't specify a
-Original Message-
From: Jason Bachman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 7:13 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
I use the goto to jump across contexts with labels all the time.
goto
I use the goto to jump across contexts with labels all the time.
goto(context,exten,label). works for me.
Cool. If you have some time, tell the developer to update the docs!
Definitely cool. I will test this out and if I can make it work on my
test machine then I will be happy to update
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 12:07 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
I use the goto to jump across contexts with labels all the time
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
I use the goto to jump across contexts with labels all the time.
goto(context,exten,label). works for me.
Cool. If you have some time, tell the developer to update the docs!
Definitely cool. I will test this out and if I can make it work on my
test
There's no mention of labels.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Lyndon-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 12:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+Goto
show application goto
-= Info about application 'Goto' =-
[Synopsis]
Jump to a particular priority, extension, or context
[Description]
Goto([[context|]extension|]priority): This application will cause
the
calling
Mea culpa. Did not read properly :)
Julian
Michael Collins wrote:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+Goto
show application goto
-= Info about application 'Goto' =-
[Synopsis]
Jump to a particular priority, extension, or context
[Description]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:28 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
How would goto work if all the priorities where n?
...
Example
Thanks Michael. I was not aware that labels where available.
In converting though, I've already hit a limitation. There's a single
name
space for all labels I assume?
Doug,
According to TFOT's Goto() application reference entry (page 254) the
namespace is actually the current extension:
Named
...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:22 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Thanks Michael. I was not aware that labels where available
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Oh Crud. So, if I want to jump to another extension or context, I have to
specify the full context, extension and priority? I can't specify a label?
It's a bit tricky trying to jump to a specific priority in an extension when
they're all called 'n' !
No. Labels are
: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Thanks Michael. I was not aware that labels where available.
In converting though, I've already hit a limitation.
There's a single
name
space for all labels I assume?
Doug,
According to TFOT's Goto() application reference entry (page 254) the
namespace is actually
-Users] AEL #include
Thanks Michael. I was not aware that labels where available.
In converting though, I've already hit a limitation.
There's a single
name
space for all labels I assume?
Doug,
According to TFOT's Goto() application reference entry (page 254) the
namespace is actually
Oh Crud. So, if I want to jump to another extension or context, I have
to
specify the full context, extension and priority? I can't specify a
label?
It's a bit tricky trying to jump to a specific priority in an
extension
when they're all called 'n' !
Why is something so simple such a
I apologize for my silly prior response, I didn't read the thread
enough
:(
Your humility is much appreciated!!
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On 5/31/06, Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Oh Crud. So, if I want to jump to another extension or context, I have to
specify the full context, extension and priority? I can't specify a label? It's a
bit tricky trying to jump to a specific priority in an
No, only works in the old language, or in AEL2 which is released in trunk.
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Anyone know if #include works in ael yet?
extensions.ael:
#include inc/pbx/global.conf
context test_context {
};
*CLI ael reload
May 30 13:56:45 NOTICE[8516]:
In non-developer-speak, that means, 'not in current release', correct?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Douglas Garstang wrote:
In non-developer-speak, that means, 'not in current release', correct?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
Douglas Garstang wrote:
In non-developer-speak, that means, 'not in current release', correct?
That is correct. AEL was an experimental feature in Asterisk 1.2.x, and
was never fully implemented in that release.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided
, 'not in current release', correct?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
No, only works in the old language
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Colp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
...[stuff removed]
Not in the 1.2 release series, no. It only receives bug fixes
-Original Message-
From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:25 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Douglas Garstang wrote:
In non-developer-speak, that means
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Actually... it means not in the production release. the subversion
trunk is a release but it is not for the faint at heart. While
generally everything works pretty well, it is expected that you will
find bugs and have issues :)
Sean
Douglas Garstang
]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
...[stuff removed]
Not in the 1.2 release series, no. It only receives bug fixes
and this
would not be a bug fix.
Well, it looks like not in the svn trunk
Douglas Garstang wrote:
So... bottom line appears to be that AEL2 is not usable.
Interesting logic.. you need asterisk-addons, so that means AEL2 is not
usable. I'm sure all the people who worked hard on the code and its
testing would disagree with you, since it works fine :-)
The fact that
Sean Cook wrote:
Actually... it means not in the production release. the subversion
trunk is a release but it is not for the faint at heart. While
generally everything works pretty well, it is expected that you will
find bugs and have issues :)
No, SVN trunk is not a 'release'. It's a
.
Regards,
- Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas
Garstang
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:16 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
-Original Message-
From: Kevin
-
From: Sean Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Actually... it means not in the production release. the subversion
trunk is a release but it is not for the faint
On 30/05/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, like asterisk-addons not compiling, which for anyome that wants to use
cdr-mysql, or realtime, makes it useless.
It's a development snapshot, you can't expect it not to have issues.
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Yes, like asterisk-addons not compiling, which for anyome that wants to use
cdr-mysql, or realtime, makes it useless.
Again, not true. Realtime works just fine in SVN trunk, except for the
direct MySQL driver. There is the ODBC driver and the PostgreSQL driver
available
Is it going to be sticking around? I sure hope so, because the
extensions.conf language is a management nightmare. Every time you add
logic, you have to renumber everything, and hope you don't make
mistakes
in re-setting all the dependant goto's. It ain't exactly easy to read
later on either.
Aaron Daniel wrote:
AEL2 is included in SVN trunk, it replaced AEL completely, so
theoretically pbx_ael should compile just like it did before.
No, it has a number of sub-components and some Makefile rules now, so I
don't think it could be backported to 1.2.x.
Uh, yup. I'm using it now. Well, learning it now :)
Julian
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
So... bottom line appears to be that AEL2 is not usable.
Interesting logic.. you need asterisk-addons, so that means AEL2 is not
usable. I'm sure all the people who worked hard on the
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Aaron Daniel wrote:
AEL2 is included in SVN trunk, it replaced AEL completely, so
theoretically pbx_ael should compile just like it did before.
No, it has a number of sub-components and some Makefile rules now, so I
don't think it could be
No, SVN trunk is not a 'release'. It's a development area. A 'release'
involves packaging it, documenting the changes, and handling bug reports
against it in a different way.
I guess I see release as a verb and not a noun. Probably is a good idea
to use the appropriate terminology... my
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/30/2006 4:01 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AEL #include
Is it going to be sticking around? I sure hope so, because
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Well I don't know if I am missing something or not, but we have various
loops and other things in there. So, we need to use the good old ugly goto().
How would goto work if all the priorities where n?
That is what labels are for. Goto can use labels as targets,
How would goto work if all the priorities where n?
...
Example from one of my dial plans:
exten = talk,1,ForkCDR
exten = talk,n,Set(NUMTRIES=1)
exten = talk,n,GotoIf($[${NUMTRIES} = 1]?first)
exten = talk,n(repeat),Background(Initial-greeting)
exten =
47 matches
Mail list logo
