Of Dr.
Michael J. Chudobiak
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:14 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
D-Link has a 4 port FXO device on their site.
http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=2pid=451
Apparently it hasn't
/2006 1:01 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
I believe that Avaya is rebranding this device for use with there new
system ( actually they bought NIMCAT) the phones are adhoc networked -
no server- ( anyway this may
Has anyone tried putting tdm fxo module into iaxy? I'm not using my
(older,green) iaxy right now 'cause I took the fxs module out and put it
on my tdm board, so I'm tempted to put my fxo module in it. Seems like
it should be able to receive calls, make calls, bridge calls, do
dtmf
I think you would need to alter the firmware to set the kewlstart to
FXS instead of FXO. This is just a thought, I have not done such. I
decided that if it worked then such a device would have been marketed
already.
D-Link has a 4 port FXO device on their site.
On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
I think you would need to alter the firmware to set the kewlstart to
FXS instead of FXO. This is just a thought, I have not done such. I
decided that if it worked then such a device would have been marketed
already.
D-Link has a 4 port FXO
- Original Message -
From: Martin Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Latham
I am looking at using these on a overhead paging job to connect to
some paging adapters.
The costs are fine as long as it performs the function.
On 3/22/06, Martin Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
I think you would need to alter the
D-Link has a 4 port FXO device on their site.
http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=2pid=451
Apparently it hasn't shipped yet and costs $500.00
I've been testing a AudioCodes MP104-FXO-C3S (around $1000) 4-port FXO
box. It works, but the number of configuration options are staggering,
complex,
Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
I think you would need to alter the firmware to set the kewlstart to
FXS instead of FXO
- b2Cory
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
D-Link has a 4 port FXO
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
D-Link has a 4 port FXO device on their site.
http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=2pid=451
Apparently it hasn't shipped yet and costs $500.00
I've been testing a AudioCodes MP104-FXO-C3S (around $1000)
4-port
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Martin Joseph wrote:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
I think you would need to alter the firmware to set the kewlstart to
FXS instead of FXO. This is just a thought, I have not done such. I
decided that if it worked then such a device would have been
Also note the use of FXO for Overhead Paging needs. Most all systems
from Valcom, Bogen and some others are C.O. Line only and the line
converter can cause huge delays in broadcast..
On 3/19/06, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the interest of Symmetry, does anyone else in the world
Steve Murphy wrote:
Hello--
In the interest of Symmetry, does anyone else in the world see any need
for a device like the IAXy (or the SIP ones from other manufacturers,
like the ATA186), but one that presents an FXO interface instead, so it
can be connected not to phones, but the PSTN?
In the interest of Symmetry, does anyone else in the world see any need
for a device like the IAXy (or the SIP ones from other manufacturers,
like the ATA186), but one that presents an FXO interface instead, so it
can be connected not to phones, but the PSTN?
There's a hugh market for such a
YES YES YES
-Original Message-
From: Steve Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 2:32 AM
To: Asterisk User List
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] An FXO version of IAXy?
Hello--
In the interest of Symmetry, does anyone else in the world see any need
for a device like
On Mar 18, 2006, at 11:31 PM, Steve Murphy wrote:
Hello--
In the interest of Symmetry, does anyone else in the world see any need
for a device like the IAXy (or the SIP ones from other manufacturers,
like the ATA186), but one that presents an FXO interface instead, so it
can be connected not
17 matches
Mail list logo
