Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Man Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:13 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Asterisk Man
Thanks buddy, But I think, AMD helps when I call customer first and then SIP extension. Any other suggestion! On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: -- *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg call generated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread federico cabiddu
Hi, you could use AMD app (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+AMD) and connect the two calls or not according to the result of AMD. But: 1) results can be more or less accurate depending on the settings and the goodness of the parameters can depend also on the callee country

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Man Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread federico cabiddu
AMD is used mainly in scenarios like yours where an agent (the SIP extension) is called, then an outbound call is generated and finally the two legs are bridged. In your case you could call the Dial cmd using the M option. The argument of M can be a macro like this simple one: exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Asterisk Man
This seems better. I will give it a try. Thanks federico. On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:10 PM, federico cabiddu federico.cabi...@gmail.com wrote: AMD is used mainly in scenarios like yours where an agent (the SIP extension) is called, then an outbound call is generated and finally the two legs

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering Machine Detection

2007-12-23 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tong wrote: If i use AMD() or the code below, now the problem is the fax machine/modem detection and answer machine detection get detected as the same. If i need to seperate the two how do i do that? For example, if i use AMD() to detect an

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering Machine Detection

2007-12-23 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tong wrote: If i use AMD() or the code below, now the problem is the fax machine/modem detection and answer machine detection get detected as the same. If i need to seperate the two how do i do that? For example, if i use AMD() to detect an

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering Machine Detection

2007-12-02 Thread dave cantera
carlos, you got further than I did... AMD didn't work at all on my release.. I think I was using 1.4.11 at the time... I ended up using the below daveC ;--- amdtest (ext 13) starts here ; ; restructure this for the following conditions: ; 13 using

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering Machine Detection

2007-12-02 Thread Tong
If i use AMD() or the code below, now the problem is the fax machine/modem detection and answer machine detection get detected as the same. If i need to seperate the two how do i do that? For example, if i use AMD() to detect an answer machine by saying any greeting exceeding 2.5 seconds is a

Re: [asterisk-users] answering machine detection

2006-10-05 Thread Matt Florell
Are you possibly using GnuDialer or VICIDIAL? If so, you would probably get a better response by posting to their forums rather than the general asterisk-users list: GuDialer Forum: http://forum.acmcllc.com/ VICIDIAL Forum: http://www.eflo.net/VICIDIALforum One more thing, there is no

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-06 Thread Matt Florell
I've read about app_amd and asterisk but there doesn't seem to be much info about it out there. Is it called something else? and where do I look for it? MATT---On 10/5/05, Adam Robins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's already built in.AMD.On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Cory Andrews wrote: Anyone aware if Digium

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-06 Thread Adam Robins
FlorellSent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:13 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection I've read about app_amd and asterisk but there doesn't seem to be much info about it out there. Is it called something else? and where

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-06 Thread Matt Florell
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection I've read about app_amd and asterisk but there doesn't seem to be much info about it out there. Is it called something else? and where do I look for it?MATT--- On 10/5/05, Adam Robins

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-06 Thread Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com/
parents asterisk box with zap chan... -Original Message- From: Matt Florell[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/6/05 5:48:09 PM To: Adam Robins[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-05 Thread Kevin Walsh
Anyone aware if Digium or Sangoma, or possibly a function of Asterisk, supports answering machine detection on an outbound call? I usually just listen to the voice. If it says something along the lines of leave a message after the tone then it's probably a machine. I can then choose to leave a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-05 Thread Matt Florell
Several people have claimed to have an accurate Answering-Machine detection method working on their Asterisk systems, but only a couple of them have made their code or settings public or free. The big problem with Answering Machine detection is that no matter what method you use it requires

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-05 Thread steve
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Cory Andrews wrote: Anyone aware if Digium or Sangoma, or possibly a function of Asterisk, supports answering machine detection on an outbound call? I'll post a detector on Mantis tomorrow (honestly!) Steve ___ --Bandwidth

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2005-10-05 Thread Adam Robins
It's already built in. AMD. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 4:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection with app_machinedetect.c

2005-03-04 Thread Tigran Petrossian
Aram jan tun es ? ---(RE) MSG (Start)--- Hello, Is there any documentation available on how to use app_machinedetect.c to detect answering machine? Or is there anyone who can give me some pointers? We have compiled * with app_machinedetect.c, but not able to use it

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection withapp_machinedetect.c

2005-03-04 Thread Matthew Boehm
, March 04, 2005 5:34 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection withapp_machinedetect.c Aram jan tun es ? ---(RE) MSG (Start)--- Hello, Is there any documentation available on how to use app_machinedetect.c to detect answering machine

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2004-03-31 Thread Peter Brown
Francois Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 13:15 31/03/04 +0530, you wrote: Hi, How do I detect an Answering Machine in Asterisk. I saw a post by Francois Lambert on 19 Jan. but am unable to get his email id. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02388.html Can somebody please help? Thank

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Steve Underwood
Alastair Maw wrote: On 27/10/03 21:57, DUSTIN WILDES wrote: Does anyone have any recommendations on implementing Answering Machine detection for call generation programs? There's obviously no nice way of doing this. If you're doing telemarketing, and you're playing pre-recorded audio, which

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Michiel Betel
oktober 2003 3:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection Humans tend to say Hello? (short burst of audio followed by silence), and answering machines tend to say I'm sorry I'm not here right now, please leave a message after the beep (long burst of audio

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Chris Ziomkowski
Actually, Back in '99, Dialogic used a very simple algorithm, and it was surprisingly accurate. You simply watch and see how long the initial greeting is. If it is short (say, only a few seconds), then it is generally a live person. However, if the initial greeting lasts for much longer (say

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread DUSTIN WILDES
of our employees. Calls them up and reminds them of important tasks like meetings and stuff. -Original Message- From: Michiel Betel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection See

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Bryan Nolen
Why not just ask them to press-any-key ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DUSTIN WILDES Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 12:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection Thanks for all

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread DUSTIN WILDES
Because I need detection for the logging functions. Otherwise I won't get accurate logging results. -Original Message- From: Bryan Nolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Ray Burkholder
Might want to write a new energy detector algorithm in dsp.c though based on a wideband/low Q resonator approach (move the pole way in towards the origin) as opposed to narrow band goertzels (pole on the unit circle). More robust for this type of work. Where does one go to learn this

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Ken Godee
Why not just ask them to press-any-key ? And if any of them get confused you can refer them to Compaq frequently asked question #2859 http://web14.compaq.com/falco/detail.asp?FAQnum=FAQ2859 :) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Asterisk online forums
*** - Original Message - From: Ray Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:17 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection Might want to write a new energy detector algorithm

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Steve Underwood
Did you mistype or something. That link is about power profiling the consumption of DSPs :-) Regards, Steve Asterisk online forums wrote: some information can be found here about algorithm and descriptions of method being used. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/393112.html Regards, Alexander

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Chris, That is exactly the Dialogic implementation I was referring to that was utterly useless. It works OK when people are demoing, as they always follow a certain pattern. In real like it I've always found it a recipe for screaming angry users. Depnding on your use it can get over 90% of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Steve Underwood
Ray Burkholder wrote: Might want to write a new energy detector algorithm in dsp.c though based on a wideband/low Q resonator approach (move the pole way in towards the origin) as opposed to narrow band goertzels (pole on the unit circle). More robust for this type of work. Where

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Chris Ziomkowski
At 09:17 AM 10/29/2003 -0500, you wrote: Might want to write a new energy detector algorithm in dsp.c though based on a wideband/low Q resonator approach (move the pole way in towards the origin) as opposed to narrow band goertzels (pole on the unit circle). More robust for this type of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-29 Thread Chris Ziomkowski
At 11:52 PM 10/29/2003 +0800, you wrote: Ray Burkholder wrote: Might want to write a new energy detector algorithm in dsp.c though based on a wideband/low Q resonator approach (move the pole way in towards the origin) as opposed to narrow band goertzels (pole on the unit circle). More robust

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-28 Thread Alastair Maw
On 27/10/03 21:57, DUSTIN WILDES wrote: Does anyone have any recommendations on implementing Answering Machine detection for call generation programs? There's obviously no nice way of doing this. If you're doing telemarketing, and you're playing pre-recorded audio, which of course is a nasty

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answering Machine Detection

2003-10-28 Thread Eric Wieling
Humans tend to say Hello? (short burst of audio followed by silence), and answering machines tend to say I'm sorry I'm not here right now, please leave a message after the beep (long burst of audio followed by a beep and silence). So, basically you need to decide 1) what is audio and what is