On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, AR Tarzi wrote:
could you please tell how it interfaces with Asterisk? Could I receive calls
into Asterisk? send calls out?
I've just downloaded it and am searching (unsuccessfully) for these on
Gizmo's site/software.
Gizmo isn't just a soft phone. Like Skype, its a
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:56:30PM -0800, Kerry Garrison wrote:
Yes you can send and receive calls via Asterisk.
http://voipspeak.net/index.php?/content/view/19/28/
Which demostrates how to connect to sipphone.com . This is very simple,
indeed. But what about text chats with gizmo-project
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 23:23
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Skype anywhere/anyhow?
Everyone should simply uninstall Skype and switch to the Gizmo project
because it interfaces quite nicely with Asterisk.
Kerry Garrison
Publisher - http://GeekGazette.com - http://VOIPSpeak.net
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:31:01PM +0100, Lenz wrote:
http://www.gizmoproject.com/
from the website, it quite looks like skype - no network setup, IM
integration, you may call POTS phones by paying the company who did it.
not very useful, in the end, if the purpouse is asterisk-skype
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:41:30PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
...
And this is bad for us. With Gizmo we can talk. With google talk we have
stand a chance of talking. But we're blocked from Skype.
since you cite it, what compatibility is there with google talk ?
any pointer to descriptions of
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:50:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:41:30PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
...
And this is bad for us. With Gizmo we can talk. With google talk we have
stand a chance of talking. But we're blocked from Skype.
since you cite it, what
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:50:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:41:30PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
...
And this is bad for us. With Gizmo we can talk. With google talk we have
stand a chance of talking. But we're blocked from Skype.
since you cite it, what
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brian Capouch
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2005 06:06
Mark Hulber wrote:
The paper is definitely interesting and I commend them for
their effort but it doesn't represent a complete
Interesting that Skype cant prevent itself becoming a super-node unlike KaZaa. Wonder what that does to capped ADSL lines in South Africa...RobOn 12/19/05,
Paul Hewlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 December 2005 14:23, Francesco Peeters (Asterisk) wrote: On Mon, December 19, 2005 11:33,
On Mon, December 19, 2005 11:33, Evert Meulie said:
Hi all!
I am aware of products like http://www.rsdevs.com/psgw_sip.shtml which act
as a gateway, but what I'd really like is a for example an Asterisk module
that can route calls to Skype, perhaps the same
principle as IAX2?
I'm assuming
On Monday 19 December 2005 14:23, Francesco Peeters (Asterisk) wrote:
On Mon, December 19, 2005 11:33, Evert Meulie said:
Hi all!
I am aware of products like http://www.rsdevs.com/psgw_sip.shtml which
act as a gateway, but what I'd really like is a for example an Asterisk
module that
The paper is definitely interesting and I commend them for their effort
but it doesn't represent a complete understanding of the Skype protocol
to the extent that an Asterisk server could speak the Skype protocol.
They say that much of the Skype protocol is encrypted and needs to be
inferred
Mark Hulber wrote:
The paper is definitely interesting and I commend them for their effort
but it doesn't represent a complete understanding of the Skype protocol
to the extent that an Asterisk server could speak the Skype protocol.
They say that much of the Skype protocol is encrypted and
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Capouch
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 12:06 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Skype anywhere/anyhow?
Mark Hulber wrote:
The paper is definitely interesting
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 23:23
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Skype anywhere/anyhow?
Everyone should simply uninstall Skype and switch to the Gizmo project
because it interfaces quite nicely with Asterisk
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AR Tarzi
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Skype anywhere/anyhow?
could you please tell how it interfaces with Asterisk? Could I receive calls
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:56:30PM -0800, Kerry Garrison wrote:
Yes you can send and receive calls via Asterisk.
http://voipspeak.net/index.php?/content/view/19/28/
so let me understand.
One nice feature of skype is the excellent (for the user; i
understand the sysadmin may see this as a
] On Behalf Of Luigi Rizzo
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 3:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Skype anywhere/anyhow?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:56:30PM -0800, Kerry Garrison wrote:
Yes you can send and receive calls via Asterisk
On 14:56, Mon 19 Dec 05, Kerry Garrison wrote:
Yes you can send and receive calls via Asterisk.
http://voipspeak.net/index.php?/content/view/19/28/
Is there any change you can provide the sip.conf and
extensions.conf stuff this generates?
I'm not an amp user, nor do I want to use it just to
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:18:18PM -0800, Kerry Garrison wrote:
I don't know exactly how it works, but since it appears to just be SIP, I
would have to assume a STUN setup. I haven't bothered to sit there and watch
the packets go by to see what its doing under the hood.
thanks - luigi
I sincerely believe that it's completely non-sense to make a channel for
Skype.
Skype is a *proprietary* protocol. If they(ebay) don't like the idea of
someone messing around their network,
they will change the protocol specification, launching a new version, for
example, and *all* the work
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:54:50AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sincerely believe that it's completely non-sense to make a channel for
Skype.
Skype is a *proprietary* protocol. If they(ebay) don't like the idea of
someone messing around their network,
they will change the protocol
I agree. Perhaps put the time into making new cool
features so that Skype folks can look at some SIP
client and say 'wow - I want that too, let's
switch from Skype' ;)
The world would be a better place without Skype,
without proprietary standards..
Let me disagree with that. The advantage of
23 matches
Mail list logo
