Holy cow! Why are there so many asterisk instances running? There should
only be 1.
kill them all and start just 1 asterisk
-Matthew
- Original Message -
From: Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 9:35 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
On Friday 07 January 2005 16:04, Matthew Boehm wrote:
Holy cow! Why are there so many asterisk instances running? There should
only be 1.
kill them all and start just 1 asterisk
Do not top post, learn to trim.
There is 1 process and many threads.
Um, that's about normal here. It runs like 16 threads on a fresh startup.
Maybe you don't have threading enabled on your box?
- Eric
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:04:59 -0600
Matthew Boehm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy cow! Why are there so many asterisk instances running? There should
only be 1.
Brian Wilkins wrote:
Sounds cool, but I heard a rumor that CF Cards don't like too many rewrites or
they start losing data.
Brian,
It boots read-only and uses ramdisks for RW stuff.
--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 02:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again,
I sent out an email last night that indicated that Asterisk 1.0.2 was
available for download. It turns out that the script that Mark and I used
to make the release checked out the code from the v1-0_stable branch
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone!
Version 1.0.2 is now available for Asterisk, Zaptel, and libpri.
Would it be possible to get official changelogs for these releases?
(If they're out there, please point me toward them.)
Thanks.
--
Andrew Thompson
http://aktzero.com/
]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone!
Version 1.0.2 is now available for Asterisk, Zaptel, and libpri.
Would it be possible to get official changelogs for these releases?
(If they're out there, please point me toward them.)
Thanks.
--
Andrew
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:01 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone!
Version 1.0.2 is now available for Asterisk, Zaptel
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
I just downloaded it and tried to run it on a development machine and
now it shows the following on startup
[app_realtime.so]Oct 26 09:35:46 WARNING[-154464]: loader.c:248
It crashes now and won't start.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:01 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk
Does anyone know if just installing the new asterisk will work fine or do I have to remove the 'old' install first?
greets
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 18:05, Eric Wieling wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone!
Version 1.0.2 is now available for Asterisk,
no
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of christophe de coninck
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
Does anyone
Andrew Thompson said:
Would it be possible to get official changelogs for these releases?
If they'd upgrade the issue tracker to something a bit more recent, it'd
generate the detailed changelog automatically from the issues marked as
resolved in each release.
Hint, hint... Took me less than
Brian West wrote:
Does anyone know if just installing the new asterisk will work fine
or do
I have to remove the 'old' install first?
greets
no
I generally tar and gzip the three folders to a backup folder before I
do upgrades.
--
Andrew Thompson
http://aktzero.com/
Hello
I compiled the new 1.02 over 1.01
My old asterisk 1.01 was compiled (on redhat 9.0) by downloading the src
tarball from ftp.asterisk.com/pub/asterisk
I did this the exact same way now, downloaded the 1.02 tarball, unpacked
it, killed all asterisk 1.01 processes, issued a 'make' and
rm all the .so's and try again.
bkw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
Hello
I compiled
I did the trick, Wonderfull!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 23:21
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
rm all the .so's
23:21
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
rm all the .so's and try again.
bkw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello Brian , Why wouldn't 'make clean' do just that ?
Tia , JimL
Make clean cleans them from the buildroot. Brian is talking about
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules - those .so's need to go when going from CVS
- 1.0.x
rm /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/*.so
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
