On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:08:34 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
be it. Most of the unstable behavior has been in GUI based parts:
Gnome in particular. Since no sane person runs * on a machine that is
also running X, it's a non-issue.
Is this always going to be the case?
please post the makefile hackings. i have a sparc64 gathering dust.
- Original Message -
From: Ming-Wei Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk
I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586
Steve Totaro wrote:
please post the makefile hackings. i have a sparc64 gathering dust.
---
this is against CVS-NHEAD-07/28/04-15:58:08
and includes my install path in /opt
Ming-Wei
diff --recursive -u asterisk/Makefile asterisk.orig/Makefile
--- asterisk/Makefile 2004-07-28 16:03:20.0
be it. Most of the unstable behavior has been in GUI based parts:
Gnome in particular. Since no sane person runs * on a machine that is
also running X, it's a non-issue.
Is this always going to be the case?
Is there no way of saying X doesn't get what it wants unless noone
else wants it?
I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586 and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60
2x450/1GB RAM),
they are running great.
On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box, some hackings in the
Makefiles are needed,
Ming-Wei
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:23:41PM +, Mark Woods said:
No, it won't be the absolute latest code, but the Debian
community is pretty good about keeping packages updated.
ah! ah! ah!
really... oh oh, so why debian is eons later in releasing
new packages...
perhaps you're
Walt Reed
Enviado el: Jueves, 29 de Julio de 2004 10:12 a.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:23:41PM +, Mark Woods said:
No, it won't be the absolute latest code, but the Debian community
is pretty good about
Sebastian Nocetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All distributions are based on same kernels... And in my opinion,
Kernel is who does all work in an operative systemm.. I am wrong?...
Sort of. libc is the other thing that can affect performance. However,
any distribution worth its salt will provide a
Gentoo's
performance improvements from recompiling the world are usually more
psychological than practical.
http://www.funroll-loops.org/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To
Exactly...which is why I run unstable.
-Mark
perhaps you're speaking of -unstable debian... that's
wy too unstable.
A...but I *am* running unstable! And it's been quite,
well, stable!
:)
There is a huge misconception about stable vs unstable. FWIW, I have
found debian unstable
Hi Andy,
I have had tremendous success running Asterisk on Slackware linux version 9.1. Its
very quick to install and I had absolutely no problem compiling the source code for
Asterisk or anything else so far. I have asterisk running on 2 servers right now that
use Slackware.
-James
Most die hard Linux fans build their own
distribution. But there is also gentoo which is VERY popular.
- Original Message -
From:
Eric Kirkland
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:13
AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for
Asterisk
Hi
Oh boy, time for distro wars :)
I have found that for some reason Asterisk seems to run better on Slackware
than Redhat, that's just my personal non-scientific observations, but we
have 4 Asterisk servers in production(two redhat 9, one slackware 9.1 and
one slackware 10.0) with almost identical
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:13:37 -0400, Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to run
Asterisk? I'd like to be able to run the Text To Speech apps and some of
the extended functions of the software (no phone hardware needed, all
Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to
run Asterisk?
Best is highly subjective, and asking is likely to provoke a holy war ;)
I'd like to be able to run the Text To Speech apps and some of the
extended functions of the
Andy,
I have limited Linux experience, but I have Asterisk installed on a
Slackware 10 box. I had some assistance from our developer (he knows a
lot more than I do with using Linux). It seemed to install quick and I
don't recall having any problems.
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leif Madsen
Sent: 28 July 2004 14:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:13:37 -0400, Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to run
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 09:13, Eric Kirkland wrote:
I'm having difficulty compiling the TTS stuff.
You aren't very specific about the problems you are having compiling
Festival but on the off chance that your problems were the same ones I
had you might want to check out this:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk
Well, I am not going to say what is or isn't the best. (Because
everything is good depending on
think you'll find that as long as your favorite distro is
decent, Asterisk will work.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Corlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: newsgate.asterisk-users
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux
Peter Corlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to
run Asterisk?
Best is highly subjective, and asking is likely to provoke a holy war ;)
Agreed. Having said that, Gentoo is clearly the best.
I'm not religous about any particular flavor of Linux,
but I am highly partial to Debian, for multiple reasons.
As far as running *, I think one can simply to an
apt-get install asterisk libpri zaptel and be ready to
go.
No, it won't be the absolute latest code, but the Debian
community is
Hi Andy,
Before Asterisk came into my life, I hadn't used Linux since RedHat 4.7.
I did some research and decided to use one of the debian netinst images
this go around, and I couldn't be happier.
While it took me a day stumbling thru the packages and re-learning my
way around, figuring out
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:22:53 -0400, Deon Rodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may sound bad, but I use Fedora Core 1.
I don't think it sounds bad. I'm using FC2. I really like it. I
haven't done a lot of the advanced stuff on it yet, but zaptel and
Asterisk compiled fine with the stock kernel
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 08:13, Eric Kirkland wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to run
Asterisk? I'd like to be able to run the Text To Speech apps and some of
the extended functions of the software (no phone hardware needed, all Voice
over IP stuff)... I'm
sorry, but I cannot resist...
Il mer, 2004-07-28 alle 17:44, Mark Woods ha scritto:
I'm not religous about any particular flavor of Linux,
but I am highly partial to Debian, for multiple reasons.
I agree.
snip
No, it won't be the absolute latest code, but the Debian
community is pretty good
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Woods
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk
I'm not religous about any particular flavor of Linux,
but I am
I am running a RedHat Enterprise Linux 3 rebuild. Fairly easy just
recompile the RedHat 9 SRPMS and off you go :)
I like the fact that updates are supported until at least 2008 :) unlike
Fedora
The rebuild I use is taolinux.org
I have another box running Gentoo but the Asterisk ebuild is still
Peter Corlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to
run Asterisk?
Best is highly subjective, and asking is likely to provoke a holy war ;)
Agreed. Having said that, Gentoo is clearly the best.
We use Asterisk successfully on White Box Linux (which is derived from
the freely available part of RedHat Enterprise Linux 3.0). We package our
own rpm:s of asterisk since we have a few local modifications.
Peter
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 13:12, usedcanon wrote:
Peter Corlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to
run Asterisk?
Best is highly subjective, and asking is likely to provoke a holy war ;)
Hi,
I use Gentoo, and find it's documentation and package management
excellent.
Try here
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/index.xml
Chris
--
Chris
--
E Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IAXTEL: 17003366726
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, usedcanon wrote:
usedcanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Corlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks; Can anyone recommend the best Linux OS (versions, etc) to
run Asterisk?
Best is highly subjective, and asking is likely to provoke a holy war
;)
Agreed.
No, it won't be the absolute latest code, but the Debian
community is pretty good about keeping packages updated.
ah! ah! ah!
really... oh oh, so why debian is eons later in releasing
new packages...
perhaps you're speaking of -unstable debian... that's
wy too unstable.
Of course, if you really want _ultimate_ performance, build your own distro.
- Original Message -
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 13:12
We use Debian here and it works just fine (using Asterisk CVS head
rather than the Debian packages, though).
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 21:31, mattf wrote:
Oh boy, time for distro wars :)
I have found that for some reason Asterisk seems to run better on Slackware
than Redhat, that's just my
36 matches
Mail list logo
