Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe question

2014-12-17 Thread Dale Noll
Jerry, asterisk_execute() event_list=0 ret=55 last_command='Action: Logoff' Response: Error[CR ][LF ]Message: Missing action in request[CR ][LF ][CR ][LF ] Shows an error. Perhaps the originate did not complete before the logoff was sent? I have never used original in AMI so it is just a guess.

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe question

2014-12-17 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi Dale, I am in fact doing all the items you suggest. here is a log. For normal commands I am logging off just fine. Its just the heartbeat command I am getting an error on when logging out. Thoughts? Jerry -- asterisk_command() Action: Login asterisk_command() Username: X asterisk_c

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe question

2014-12-16 Thread Dale Noll
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I am running a heartbeat... Asterisk 11.15.0 - same behaviour is noticed > on 1.4.43 also > > I issue a call through the API that does the below. just UserEvent and > Hangup > >-- Executing [s@heartbeat:1] UserEvent("Local/s@heartbeat-

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-08 Thread Danny Nicholas
users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6:09 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > You're on the right track, Steve but t

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-05 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > You're on the right track, Steve but that didn't do it either. Here is > the Perl snippet: > use strict; > use warnings; > my $towatch = $ARGV[0]; > my $a=0; > my $retval=undef; > # show hints will get hint information from the dialplan > while ($a<1)

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-05 Thread Elliot Otchet
Otchet Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 9:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi FYI - It works fine under perl 5.8.8 on RHEL5.2 w/ Asterisk 1.4.24.1 You might want to check your perl modules to see if they're up to

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-05 Thread Elliot Otchet
lf Of Danny Nicholas Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 9:43 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi You're on the right track, Steve but that didn't do it either. Here is the Perl snippet: use strict;

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-05 Thread Danny Nicholas
ilto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 6:37 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > Here's what I got from

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-04 Thread Steve Edwards
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > Here's what I got from agi debug: > agi debug > AGI Debugging Enabled > *CLI> AGI Tx >> agi_request: hintcheck.agi [snip] > AGI Rx << SET VARIABLE LINESTAT="Idle" > AGI Tx >> 200 result=1 > [Jun 4 13:33:42] ERROR[28261]: utils.c:979 ast_carefulwrite:

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-04 Thread Danny Nicholas
LINESTAT="Hold" Any other ideas? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:12 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-04 Thread Steve Edwards
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > Hi gang, It's not a gang -- it's a club :) > Since I'm getting no joy from device_Status or SIPPEER in > 1.4.26-rc1, I thought I would do an AGI to read my hints and check for > line in use that way. The AGI works fine from a prompt, but

Re: [asterisk-users] broken pipe in perl agi

2009-06-04 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Danny Nicholas schrieb: > The AGI works fine from a prompt, but returns the dreaded > "utils.c:966 ast_carefulwrite: write() returned error: Broken pipe" when I > try to run it from the dialplan. Sounds like $SIG{'PIPE'} = 'IGNORE'; is what you need. http://perldoc.perl.org/perlipc.html#Signals

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-03-09 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Friday 06 March 2009 03:02:30 pm Randy Paries wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Jose P. Espinal wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > I have been working on a little PHP software that uses AMI's > > UpdateConfig command in order to modify some of it's config files. > > > > > > I was working wi

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-03-06 Thread Randy Paries
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Jose P. Espinal wrote: > Hello List, > > I have been working on a little PHP software that uses AMI's > UpdateConfig command in order to modify some of it's config files. > > > I was working with 'Asterisk 1.4.22.1' and everything was working. > After upgrading to '

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-02-15 Thread Matt Riddell
On 14/02/2009 5:12 a.m., Örn Arnarson wrote: > I am seeing this problem on 1.6.0.1 when dialing a busy DAHDI channel... > I'm seeing it too on recent builds - is the a bt entry we can add to? -- Kind Regards, Matt Riddell Director ___ http://www.vent

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-02-13 Thread Örn Arnarson
I am seeing this problem on 1.6.0.1 when dialing a busy DAHDI channel... On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Rilawich Ango wrote: > I also experience that problem. Is it a bug? > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Mark Michelson > wrote: > > Remco Barendse wrote: > >> 1.4.23.1 is quite badly broken

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-02-13 Thread Rilawich Ango
I also experience that problem. Is it a bug? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Mark Michelson wrote: > Remco Barendse wrote: >> 1.4.23.1 is quite badly broken and there are no significant new >> features >> > > There are no new features at all, actually. What problems are you having with > 1.4

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-02-03 Thread Mark Michelson
Remco Barendse wrote: > 1.4.23.1 is quite badly broken and there are no significant new > features > There are no new features at all, actually. What problems are you having with 1.4.23.1? It doesn't accomplish much to say that it is "quite badly broken" without at least telling what is wro

Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command

2009-02-03 Thread Remco Barendse
1.4.23.1 is quite badly broken and there are no significant new features Better to revert back to 1.4.22.1 On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Jose P. Espinal wrote: > Hello List, > > I have been working on a little PHP software that uses AMI's > UpdateConfig command in order to modify some of it's config

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Broken pipe...

2004-12-31 Thread Brian West
> Junk at the beginning 49443303 > Warning, flexibel rate not heavily tested! > Ouch ... error while writing audio data: : Broken pipe These are messages from mpg123 NOT Asterisk. bkw ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com htt

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broken Pipe

2004-08-24 Thread Scott Petersen
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:55:50PM -0600, Mike Roberts wrote: > When I woke up this morning * was giving me the message "broken pipe" > when I try to log into the CLI... Thats all I know. That has happened to me several times now over the last few weeks on one of my installs. Nothing in the logs

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broken pipe in remote exeute

2004-07-14 Thread Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 13 July 2004 01:50 pm, brian wrote: > Its not something that needs fixing. > > bkw Since you made the post I assume you were trying to be helpful, can you elaborate on that? > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Broken pipe in remote exeute

2004-07-13 Thread brian
Its not something that needs fixing. bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 11:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Broken pipe in remote exeute > > -BEGIN PG

Re: [Asterisk-Users] broken pipe - * does not respond

2003-12-16 Thread Juan J. Sierralta P.
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 00:57, Nicolas wrote: > After a little investigation, I noticed that after each call on the CAPI > server, two file Descriptor stays but the strange thing is what they are > linked to: > > /proc/15118/fd> ls -l > lr-x--1 root root 64 dÃc 17 04:50 25 ->

Re: [Asterisk-Users] broken pipe - * does not respond

2003-12-16 Thread Nicolas
After a little investigation, I noticed that after each call on the CAPI server, two file Descriptor stays but the strange thing is what they are linked to: /proc/15118/fd> ls -l lr-x--1 root root 64 déc 17 04:50 25 -> pipe:[8022904] l-wx--1 root root

Re: [Asterisk-Users] broken pipe - * does not respond

2003-12-16 Thread Nicolas
Hi, My release is the last one from the CVS, I get the same problem but with a 4 BRI CAPI card (EICON DIVA SERVER 4BRI). The number of file descriptor keeps growing with each call until the system hangs. Currently in my office I have two asterisk servers, one for a gateway between 7960/SIP<->IAX

Re: [Asterisk-Users] broken pipe - * does not respond

2003-12-16 Thread Paulo H. Mannheimer
My release is about 2 month old. I don´t want to mess too much with my client´s site - it is a 100 seat call center with dozens of softphones and some app_queue.c patches we have programmed to register a couple of agents´ events. > How old is your release.. and why not update? I'm using the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] broken pipe - * does not respond

2003-12-16 Thread Brian West
How old is your release.. and why not update? I'm using the latest cvs on a few projects and its fine. bkw On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Paulo H. Mannheimer wrote: > Hi, I´m having a serious problem at one customer. After 6 hours answering a PRI > line, * stops responding in a very similar situation as