:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Hoffmeyer
Sent: 23 July 2004 15:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Large Enterprises using asterisk
PS: If already existing soft (and/or hard) phones have more of this
functionality - please let me know.
WAMi and other gui interfaces already
Hi!
What I also saw in my little research that * in not suitable for
large deployments like medium or large enterprises or sometimes even
smalls ones with specifics needs, any of you could mention a lot of
them, Call Centers, Banks, etc. and why not carriers for their own use.
Just a
Quoting Philipp von Klitzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What I also saw in my little research that * in not suitable for
large deployments like medium or large enterprises or sometimes even
smalls ones with specifics needs, any of you could mention a lot of
them, Call Centers, Banks, etc. and
Hello,
avizion wrote:
This is exactly what I will be looking for in near future. Our current setup
(Old Ericsson PBX) with these system phones having hotkeys for transfer,
hold, ACD in/out, multiple lines, etc. and a quite handy feature... the LED
that tells my weather a certain agent is busy or
PS: If already existing soft (and/or hard) phones have more of this
functionality - please let me know.
WAMi and other gui interfaces already support this.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+WAMI
We are starting work on WAMi 2.0, and I am trying to make the source
available for everyone
it will be a
tricky sale.
Rgds
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Hoffmeyer
Sent: 23 July 2004 15:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Large Enterprises using asterisk
PS: If already existing soft (and/or hard
Varun, Asterisk is still an immature product under development. It is a
very promising product but still immature for most companies to look at
it however there are a number of SI's here in Australia watching it and
observing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to
asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of
investment.
Are there some problems with asterisk ???
It's not a solution-out-of-the-box, but a PBX construction kit. So you'd
need sigificant time, probably infrastructure changes.
And then
Of Holger
Schurig
Sent: 22 July 2004 08:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Large Enterprises using asterisk
Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to
asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of
investment.
Are there some problems with asterisk ???
It's
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 00:24, Varun Gupta wrote:
HI
I want to know
Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to
asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of
investment.
F500 companies are slow due to their largese. They also are lemmings.
You will find that those who are true
Varun Gupta wrote:
I want to know
Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to
asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of
investment.
The short answer is corporate innertia. Ever head of the
saying "Nobody has ever been fired for buying IBM"?
The long
F500 companies already have a large amount of money already invested in
telecom equipment. If they would implement Asterisk, they would have to
invest in new phones and equipment along with training the support
staff. Unfortunately, not everyone knows how to use Linux.
-Original
Michael Little wrote:
Unfortunately, not everyone knows how to use Linux.
While I don't disagree with your comments in general, I
take issue with the notion that Asterisk automatically
means Linux.
In fact I believe that the headline "Asterisk - the open
source Linux
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 10:16, Sunrise Ltd wrote:
Michael Little wrote:
Unfortunately, not everyone knows how to use Linux.
While I don't disagree with your comments in general, I
take issue with the notion that Asterisk automatically
means Linux.
[snip]
Perhaps it is time to think about
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Large Enterprises using asterisk
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 10:16, Sunrise Ltd wrote:
and an effort to develop and maintain an open-source
telephony server
for UNIX based operating systems including Linux and BSD.
[snip]
I agree! This would
in a foreign language what I try
to.
Just my 2c, Leandro
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kanwar
Ranbir Sandhu
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Large Enterprises using asterisk
On Thu
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 20:23, Jay Milk wrote:
Argh Why do I always hear about things so late? Just talked to a
tech from my biggest client (I'm a contract programmer by trade).
Apparently, they were looking into getting a new phone system, 20
channels on a T1, 35 extensions, voice-mail,
On Thursday 22 July 2004 21:23, Jay Milk wrote:
I think the biggest hurdle Asterisk will face is overcoming the failed
experiments such as Altigen, and the perception that a state-of-the-art
PBX does not need maintenance.
I've never run against a commercial PBX that didn't need maintenance.
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 20:39, Tenorio, Leandro wrote:
What I also saw in my little research that * in not suitable for
large deployments like medium or large enterprises or sometimes even
smalls ones with specifics needs, any of you could mention a lot of
them, Call Centers, Banks, etc.
Hi
Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to
asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of
investment.
why you say that? as far as I know there are
very large * installation aroun the world.
also mind that there are termination providers
that are asterisk based or have asterisk in
20 matches
Mail list logo
