RE: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-24 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote: FireFly is the best of the IAX softphones. Other softphones do not work as good as FireFly. DIAX has many bugs still. DIAX Softphone disconnects with Windows DLL errors everytime there is a problem in the call like Asterisk Channel Not

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-24 Thread Dan
Hi Seshu, DIAX has many bugs still. DIAX Softphone disconnects with Windows DLL errors everytime there is a problem in the call like Asterisk Channel Not available etc. Can you provide more details and not just talk about 'many bugs'? I have no feedbacks about such kind of problems in DIAX.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-24 Thread Zoa
stable than firefly, and it has multiple lines. Regrds, T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of snacktime Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 7:45 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-24 Thread Gary
I having been DIAX without problems. Only one bug I can find and thats related to using Large screens and window sizing. it only happens @ the moment on one windows machine which hasn't been service pack'd. Now if there was a way to add a free g729a codec to it :-) Gary On Tue, 24 May 2005

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread Bryce Chidester
You might try IAXComm. It's a bit immature but works fairly well on Windows, and is cross-platform as well. However, I've found SIP clients to be better generally and better supported. Regards, Bryce Chidester Rhino Equipment Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED]        SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (480) 940-1826

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 23/05/05, Jeromy Grimmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a softphone for windows that supports IAX? I can't seem to find anything out there...maybe im looking in the wrong places... Did you think to ask Google? A search for 'Windows IAX Softphone' turns up about 5 of them, as well as

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread Adam Robins
Title: Message Try DIAX. Works just fine! http://www.laser.com/dante/diax/diax.html From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeromy GrimmettSent: Monday, May 23, 2005 12:09 PMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [Asterisk-Users]

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam RobinsSent: Monday, May 23, 2005 5:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone Try DIAX. Works just fine! http://www.laser.com/dante/diax/diax.html

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread snacktime
I agree Firefly is the best. Most of the others I have tried just plain suck, especially for non technical users. The interface is structured like a typical IM client and most people find it easy to understand. Chris ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
I agree, Firefly is the only one that seems to be at such a late stage in development. It really works quite well. However, A) I wish it had more call appearances! Put someone on hold, and call another number, right...? That would be really nice... You can't even load more than one

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone

2005-05-23 Thread Terry H. Gilsenan
May 2005 7:45 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Windows IAX Softphone I agree Firefly is the best. Most of the others I have tried just plain suck, especially for non technical users. The interface is structured like a typical IM