On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:50:12AM -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
Is there any reason not to run Asterisk on an Intel Atom board?
Only if it's not strong enough. Note that Atom may mean some different
things. So consider taking various reports with a few grains of salt.
--
Tzafrir
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:50:12AM -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
Is there any reason not to run Asterisk on an Intel Atom board?
Only if it's not strong enough. Note that Atom may mean some different
things. So
At 07:50 AM 9/30/2011, you wrote:
Is there any reason not to run Asterisk on an Intel Atom board?
Mine's been running that way for 3 years or so. 2 users 6 extensions,
SIP + 3 POTs lines with a TDM04.
Ira
--
_
--
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:16 PM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am planing to implement asterisk server but i have confusion regarding
which hardware should i pick ? We have standard IBM servers in data center
so i am planing to pick IBM x3550. so just wanted to know
Great! so IBM x3550 would be good choice for me with PCI-E card ;)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:29:28 -0300
From: lath...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk hardware server
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:16 PM, satish patel satish
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:47 PM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
Great! so IBM x3550 would be good choice for me with PCI-E card ;)
There are many models in that series but a quick look shows that they
are all PCI-E compatible. You should have no trouble.
~~~ Andrew lathama Latham
Hi,
I have ~25 AtCom AT320 phones (PA1888S based) and they was not a good
experience for me: I ran the risk to abort my Asterisk project thanks to
them!
I tried both with SIP and IAX2 firmware of every version but voice quality
was often unacceptable. In addition, they lose often registration and
On Sunday 07 May 2006 03:21, Wilson Pickett wrote:
I have had three of them for neary two years. Here's an executive review:
Which model/vendor?
-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Give idefisk a try. It works very well for me, its free, and does not
crash all the time like Cubix (formerly Firefly).
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Hello folks,
anyone using hardware IAX phones with asterisk ?
I've googled on this issue and found several hardware phones which
support IAX
Steve Totaro wrote:
Give idefisk a try. It works very well for me, its free, and does not
crash all the time like Cubix (formerly Firefly).
Hello Steve,
As far as i know 'idefisk' is a softphone, but i need a hardware phone.
Thank you for reply.
Tofik Suleymanov
He asked about hard phones not soft phones.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Totaro
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:03 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk
anyone using hardware IAX phones with asterisk ?
I've googled on this issue and found several hardware phones which
support IAX protocol, but before paying money I'd like to know more
about what people experiencing with them.
I have had three of them for neary two years. Here's an executive
Wilson Pickett wrote:
anyone using hardware IAX phones with asterisk ?
I've googled on this issue and found several hardware phones which
support IAX protocol, but before paying money I'd like to know more
about what people experiencing with them.
I have had three of them for neary two
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
Give idefisk a try. It works very well for me, its free, and does
not crash all the time like Cubix (formerly Firefly).
Hello Steve,
As far as i know 'idefisk' is a softphone, but i need a hardware phone.
Thank you for reply.
Tofik Suleymanov
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
Give idefisk a try. It works very well for me, its free, and does
not crash all the time like Cubix (formerly Firefly).
Hello Steve,
As far as i know 'idefisk' is a softphone, but i need a hardware phone.
Thank you for reply.
Tofik
On Sunday, May 07, 2006 10:07 AM Steve Totaro wrote:
Oooops, sorry its late.
Obviously. :-)
My favorites in order, Polycom, Snom, Cisco.
Since when do these use IAX? He asked for IAX hardphones... If I am mistaken
let me know since I am looking for good reliable SNOM-like IAX phones as
Keyboardot ragadtam, hogy va'laszoljak Koopmann, Jan-Peter osszedobalt
bytejaira:
Since when do these use IAX? He asked for IAX hardphones... If I am mistaken
let me know since I am looking for good reliable SNOM-like IAX phones as
well! :-)
I'm sorry if i recommend some foolish (i've just
At 12:55 PM 5/7/2006, you wrote:
Keyboardot ragadtam, hogy va'laszoljak Koopmann, Jan-Peter
osszedobalt bytejaira:
Since when do these use IAX? He asked for IAX hardphones... If I
am mistaken
let me know since I am looking for good reliable SNOM-like IAX phones as
well! :-)
I'm sorry if
I'd rather shoot myself in the head! other day we had a site that flashed the PA168 chipset phones with new firmware and they all ended up with the same MAC address!! I thought that shouldn't happen normally ...And talk about nasty cheap effects, sidetone, distortion and the list goes on.
RobOn
Well, to tell the truth, the phones, what available in Hungary, is 90%
working. The other 10% is sometimes bad as you get out off the box, sometimes
it's noisy, echoing, crappy sound, rebooting, etc.
Is i asked so many folks on Cebit (who resells this phone) most of them, told
me, there are two
Since when do these use IAX? He asked for IAX hardphones... If I
am mistaken
let me know since I am looking for good reliable SNOM-like IAX phones as
well! :-)
I'm sorry if i recommend some foolish (i've just joined the maillist)
but have you tried PA168 chip based hardphones and ATAs?
Simone wrote:
I want to thank you for the suggestions. The office is in the UK, so
probably we will go for the ISDN30. I am trying to get a SDSL 2mbit for
the line so that bandwidth should not be a problem, the internal LAN
will be Gbit as said so the QoS as suggested will be only on the
I want to thank you for the suggestions. The office is in the UK, so
probably we will go for the ISDN30. I am trying to get a SDSL 2mbit for
the line so that bandwidth should not be a problem, the internal LAN
will be Gbit as said so the QoS as suggested will be only on the
firewall (linux). I
On 4/17/06, Simone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
look at the wiki and the phones suggested, we'd definitely like phones
with internal ethernet switch and PoE capable, I'll try to get an idea
of what could work for us.
I just have a few suggestions on the phones.. First of all, try using
1 model for
phone for office and test the autoprovision functions.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simone
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:56 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
Simone wrote:
Hi list,
I am in the process of setting up Asterisk for a new office and since
this is going to be my first real installation I'd appreciate some
advice on the hardware from the real world. We will have 8 channels
(still not sure if 4xISDN2 or ISDN30 8 channels, but I will
On 14 Apr 2006, at 11:29, Simone wrote:
Hi list,
I am in the process of setting up Asterisk for a new office and
since this is going to be my first real installation I'd
appreciate some advice on the hardware from the real world. We will
have 8 channels (still not sure if 4xISDN2 or
Fabrice a écrit :
Hello all,
Just a question, on asterisk box :
I looking on the web , for asterisk at large , and 'asterisk future of
telephonie' ...
If we would like to change our OLD PABX 600 phone with 4 E1, to install a
asterisk with full ip phone in SIP, Could we use 1 Box for
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
As for the Asterisk distro I really like Xorcom Rapid:
http://www.xorcom.com/
http://rapid.dotsrc.org/rapid/RAPID.txt
The new and improved version of the auto-installer for Debian Linux and
Asterisk includes:
* Asterisk 1.0.9
... awesome
hi,
i am also looking for a hardware specfication that suit asterisk.
would u mind to show all your hardware spec for your asterisk server???
thanks
Roman Volf wrote:
Krystian Filiks wrote:
What about plain g729?
My main concern is the Hardware, anyone that can tell me if this
Supermicro
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory
Andrews
Sent: den 8 december 2005 02:43
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware recomendation
Krystian - what kind of port density are you aiming for? Will you be
running analog or digital
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware recomendation
Yes,
transcoding is not going to work for that density.
asterisk doesn't do g723, and even if it would your system would not be
able to handle more than 150 simultaneous g711 to g729/g723
transcodings
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware recomendation
Krystian - what kind of port density are you aiming for? Will you be
running analog or digital?
Cory Andrews
Senior Partner
+++
VOIPSupply.com
454 Sonwil
Krystian Filiks wrote:
What about plain g729?
My main concern is the Hardware, anyone that can tell me if this
Supermicro 6014H-32 is stable and sutible for asterisk?
Supermicro Superservers are traditionally extremely stable and reliable.
--
Roman Volf
Keystreams Internet Solutions
[EMAIL
Krystian - what kind of port density are you aiming for? Will you be
running analog or digital?
Cory Andrews
Senior Partner
+++
VOIPSupply.com
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
+++
voice - 716.630.1555 X22
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax - 716.630.1548
Krystian Filiks wrote:
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware recomendation
Krystian - what kind of port density are you aiming for? Will you be
running analog or digital?
Cory Andrews
Senior Partner
+++
VOIPSupply.com
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
+++
voice
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Architecture Group
On 04/30/05 02:42 Matt Roth said the following:
Does anyone have an interest in forming a hardware architecture group?
absolutely !
It seems that Asterisk is so tightly linked to specialized hardware and
its corresponding architecture
Daniel Salama wrote:
This is great information. I have the following questions based on a
hypothetical scenario and some assumptions:
Based on the price of these configurations, I wouldn't even mind putting
two servers each with 2 T1s just so that I could get all calls recorded
and distribute
---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:30 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
This is great information. I have the following questions based
Sure.
I setup a small lab on a machine with 4 T1s and 36 agents logged in.
The system was configured to Monitor all outbound calls as well as
monitor all calls distributed by Queue app (monitor-format setting in
queues.conf).
When recording to local disk, everything was working fine. Agents
Well, I don't think I'm ready to spend that much money :)
I understand your point regarding that load depends on usage.
SIP_Agents are simply agents answering calls. Average call length would
be about 8 minutes. During some of these calls (maybe 25%), agents will
conference the call (PSTN
12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Sure.
I setup a small lab on a machine with 4 T1s and 36 agents logged in. The
system was configured to Monitor all outbound calls as well as monitor
all calls distributed by Queue app (monitor-format setting
Thanks Daniel,
We may end up replicating your tests in order to confirm some of your
results. I don't know if it will be anytime soon, because we don't have
the hardware yet. Regardless, I will share my results with the list.
Anyone out there have any ideas on why the NFS mount affected call
Does anyone have experience with using NAS
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage) or SAN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network) for this application?
Matthew Roth
http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Running%20Asterisk%20on%20Debian
Daniel Salama wrote:
Sure.
I
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Does anyone have experience with using NAS
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage) or SAN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network) for this application?
Matthew Roth
http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page
Hi Matt,
Does anyone have experience with using NAS
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage) or SAN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network) for this
application?
I've had our agent/queue recordings dumped both to local disk and SAN
(currently using local disk as
I think that would be a great idea. The only problem I see is that
Asterisk is growing its feature set and maturing at such a dynamic
rate, that I don't know in many cases, where to point the finger at.
Sometimes it's stability of the CVS version, sometimes it's stability
of Digium or
This is an interesting question. I haven't tested it but would love to
know if it works or not. Anyone?
- Daniel
On Apr 29, 2005, at 3:38 AM, Michael Welter wrote:
I haven't seen this before--can an agent log into a queue on a remote
(i.e. over IAX) Asterisk server?
On 4/29/05, Daniel Salama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that would be a great idea. The only problem I see is that
Asterisk is growing its feature set and maturing at such a dynamic
rate, that I don't know in many cases, where to point the finger at.
Sometimes it's stability of the CVS
Does anyone have any experience with servers from siliconmechanics.com?
Are they reliable? How does * run on them?
Thanks
- Daniel
On Apr 29, 2005, at 4:22 PM, snacktime wrote:
Personally I would buy an * box from someone like asaservers.com. At
least companies like that really know their
At 4:57 PM -0400 on 4/29/05, Daniel Salama wrote:
On Apr 29, 2005, at 4:22 PM, snacktime wrote:
Personally I would buy an * box from someone like asaservers.com. At
least companies like that really know their hardware, and if you tell
them the common issues with * they could probably put together
Sounds like a good idea to me. I would watch it.
Race Vanderdecken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Roth
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
On 04/30/05 02:42 Matt Roth said the following:
Does anyone have an interest in forming a hardware architecture group?
absolutely !
It seems that Asterisk is so tightly linked to specialized hardware and
its corresponding architecture that developing the software alone is
insufficient for its
I just read a great paper that said turn off anything that won't be
used. Serial, USB , Printer ports, ETC. No Xwindows!
Daniel Salama wrote:
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki as well as on this list, different
suggestions of what to look for when designing an asterisk server with
a lot of
I have never been able to do more than 50 concurrent recordings with Zap -
SIP phone calls without the audio skipping and/or breaking up. Also, if you
are using Digium TE4XXP and want to do a lot of recording I would recommend
against a SCSI RAID card because of the interrupt conflicts that you
Could you point me in the direction where you read that? Maybe there is
more there to read.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Apr 28, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Michael D Schelin wrote:
I just read a great paper that said turn off anything that won't be
used. Serial, USB , Printer ports, ETC. No Xwindows!
Daniel
Thank you again. I will definitely do that. By cheaper asterisk
servers, do you mean single-CPU machines that can handle Quad T1s and
still do the call monitoring?
BTW, I tried the monitoring without the 'm' option and mounted the
audio directory via NFS. Big NO NO for everyone. Just do what
Daniel Salama wrote:
Thank you again. I will definitely do that. By cheaper asterisk
servers, do you mean single-CPU machines that can handle Quad T1s and
still do the call monitoring?
BTW, I tried the monitoring without the 'm' option and mounted the
audio directory via NFS. Big NO NO for
Daniel,
Could you expand upon your experience recording to an NFS mounted drive.
We are looking to use a TDM-VoIP gateway to route 16+ spans to a single
Asterisk server. We were hoping to Monitor using the following scheme:
- Monitor application executed on Asterisk server (no 'm' flag)
- Pick
.
Thanks,
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Thank you again. I will definitely do
: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Thank you again. I will definitely do that. By cheaper asterisk
servers, do you mean single-CPU
You're going to have to go a little more in depth into what you are doing in
this call center.
- Are you going to be doing inbound or outbound? (if so how much of each)
- What kind of phones are you planning on using?
- What is the maximum number of concurrent conversations you plan on having?
-
Does some hardware just not work very well with Asterisk?
Yes. (or, no, depending on how you view the question)
I've got a fresh installation on a Fedora C2, P4x2, 2GB Ram.
Some people have reported problems with FC3, I don't know if FC2 is the
same...
While listening to
I'm using the X-Lite soft phone, it has these codecs selected G711u G711a
GSM, iLBC SPX. I'm not sure which one it ends up using though.
You can see which one by looking at the codecs above the dial during a
connection.
I played with turning off all but GSM, and it didnt seem to make a
On Friday 17 December 2004 21:42, Nihal wrote:
Does some hardware just not work very well with Asterisk?
Yes. (or, no, depending on how you view the question)
I've got a fresh installation on a Fedora C2, P4x2, 2GB Ram.
Some people have reported problems with FC3, I don't know if FC2
What codec is your soft phone using?
Some of the codecs stink, also is the link to the * server heavily used?
--
Christopher Dobbs
Nihal wrote:
Does some hardware just not work very well with Asterisk?
I've got a fresh installation on a Fedora C2, P4x2, 2GB Ram.
While listening to the demo over a
What codec is your soft phone using?
Some of the codecs stink, also is the link to the * server heavily used?
I'm using the X-Lite soft phone, it has these codecs selected G711u G711a GSM,
iLBC SPX. I'm not sure which one it ends up using though.
I played with turning off all but GSM, and it
Walid Azab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Article auto-converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.)
Can I start using Asterisk with a couple of SIP IP phones and Softphone
software on users PCs only? I do not have any cards yet and will still
have to wait until I order a card.
Yes.
--
Sure you can. Thats the way I did it.
Mike
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:40:30 +0200, Walid Azab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I start using Asterisk with a couple of SIP IP phones and Softphone
software on users PCs only? I do not have any cards yet and will still have
to wait until I order a
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 05:02:26PM -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
10 analog extension using conventional phones (lets say Panasonic kx-ts3
analog)
4 analog lines coming from our telco
So i will need 3 TDM40B (total 12 FXS and none FXO so i can have 2 extra FXS
ports for future)
and one TDM04B
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 11:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
our old pbx contract will expire soon and we have now 2 pbx companies trying hard to
sell us a new VoIP one. I am usually a friend of open source software and read about
the Asterisk poject, but I can not assess if Asterisk
Michael Bielicki wrote:
- CTI support (dialing from within Outlook using hardware VoIP
phones)
there is a project for that which sems to work although we havem't
tested it yet
I'm using asttapi https://sourceforge.net/projects/asttapi/ and it works
fine.
denon wrote:
At 06:44 PM 6/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:42:57AM -0500, denon wrote:
We're doing a new * installation at a remote office soon, and I was
just
curious what people's opinions were on hardware these days .. I've had
decent luck with T100Ps and Adtran, but
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:42:57AM -0500, denon wrote:
We're doing a new * installation at a remote office soon, and I was just
curious what people's opinions were on hardware these days .. I've had
decent luck with T100Ps and Adtran, but I know times change ..
I'm looking to do roughly 15
74 matches
Mail list logo
