Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Eric Wieling
Priority jumping was deprecated in 1.2 I expect the feature was removed sometime before 1.8. Did you read all the UPGRADE*.txt files included in 1.8? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Joseph

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Joseph
On 04/13/12 13:00, Eric Wieling wrote: Priority jumping was deprecated in 1.2 I expect the feature was removed sometime before 1.8. Did you read all the UPGRADE*.txt files included in 1.8? I was still using priorityjumping in 1.4.39 :-/ No, I did not read that file. What priorityjumping

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Eric Wieling
PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8 On 04/13/12 13:00, Eric Wieling wrote: Priority jumping was deprecated in 1.2 I expect the feature was removed sometime before 1.8. Did you read all the UPGRADE*.txt files

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Joseph
Thank you for updating me. I'm few version behind and need a speedy solution :-) I found an example: ; See if line 2 is available. If not, try line 1. exten = s,1,ChanIsAvail(Zap/2Zap/1) ${AVAILCHAN} might now contain the value Zap/2-1 ; We need to strip off the session ID and Dial

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Chad Wallace
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:53:43 -0600 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying asterisk 1.8 (coming from 1.4) and it seems to me priorityjumping is not working. In extension.conf I have: priorityjumping=yes exten = 1,1,Dial(${FD_L1},25,jtrw) exten = 1,102,Dial(${FD_L2},20,trw)

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Danny Nicholas
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chad Wallace Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8 On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:53:43 -0600 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying asterisk 1.8 (coming from 1.4

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8

2012-04-13 Thread Eric Wieling
...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chad Wallace Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping - asterisk 1.8 On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:53:43 -0600 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping not working, Dial goes to n+1 not n+101

2007-07-21 Thread Perssy Llamosas
I think n+101 worked in Asterisk 1.2.x but it doesn't work in Asterisk 1.4.x use ${DIALSTATUS} if you want Asterisk to act depending the result of Dial() I read that the variable has been disabled in SVN to be replaced by the DEVSTATE function, I need to confirm that. Well... an example: exten

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping not working, Dial goes to n+1 not n+101

2007-07-20 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Did you read UPGRADE.txt? Priority jumping was deprecated in 1.2. I assume it was removed from 1.4. Jakub GÅ‚azik wrote Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] priorityjumping not working, Dial goes to n+1 not n+101

2007-07-20 Thread James FitzGibbon
On 7/20/07, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you read UPGRADE.txt? Priority jumping was deprecated in 1.2. I assume it was removed from 1.4. According to UPGRADE.txt, the default in the absence of priorityjumping= changed from yes in 1.2 to no in 1.4: * In previous

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-15 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Kennedy wrote: OK, that explains it, just wondering why the sample extensions.conf turns it off, while the O'Reilly Asterisk book and alomst everything you see on the web uses it ??? The default is to have it on. If your extensions.conf doesn't override it, then it is on. The sample

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-14 Thread Olle E Johansson
14 mar 2006 kl. 01.45 skrev Steve Kennedy: On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:38:01PM -0500, Watkins, Bradley wrote: That depends on what you mean by default. The supplied sample extensions.conf contains the priorityjumping=no by default, but if this parameter is absent then the default is to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-13 Thread Gabriel Afana
I think in 1.2.x, this jumping feature was disabled by default. - Gabe - Original Message - From: Steve Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 11:19 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no I've been trying to use a set-up

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-13 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:25:20PM -0800, Gabriel Afana wrote: I think in 1.2.x, this jumping feature was disabled by default. So should priorities still increase when the Dial returns busy (i.e. jumping to priority + 101)? Or should something else be done? Steve -- NetTek Ltd UK mob

RE: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-13 Thread Watkins, Bradley
Of Gabriel Afana Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 7:25 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no I think in 1.2.x, this jumping feature was disabled by default. - Gabe - Original Message - From: Steve Kennedy [EMAIL

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-13 Thread Gabriel Afana
: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:25:20PM -0800, Gabriel Afana wrote: I think in 1.2.x, this jumping feature was disabled by default. So should priorities still increase when the Dial returns busy (i.e. jumping to priority

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-13 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:38:01PM -0500, Watkins, Bradley wrote: That depends on what you mean by default. The supplied sample extensions.conf contains the priorityjumping=no by default, but if this parameter is absent then the default is to jump n+101. OK, that explains it, just wondering

Re: [Asterisk-Users] priorityjumping=no

2006-03-13 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Steve Kennedy wrote: On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:38:01PM -0500, Watkins, Bradley wrote: That depends on what you mean by default. The supplied sample extensions.conf contains the priorityjumping=no by default, but if this parameter is absent then the default is to jump n+101. OK, that