We've had a lot of success with Thompson Speedtouch 780 routers,
which have built in adsl modems, and two ATAs. They don't seem to use
QoS in the strictest sense, but do a very good job of prioritising
the traffic from their own ATAs. If you're happy to stick with
analogue hansets instead
> Linksys listened to demand and released a version that still has the
> Linux firmware. The model is WRT54GL with the L for Linux.
>
> Newegg has them for $57 after MIR.
Note, seems like the 'current' WRT54GL has less flash/memory than older
releases of WRT54GS, sadly :-)
http://wiki.openwrt.or
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Kenneth Padgett wrote:
I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to use for home
offices.
It should work for a scenario in which there are 3 computers and 2 SIP
phones, handling QoS so that the phones always have higher priority
traffic
than the PCs. (and not
Mike
I'm using a Cisco 1605R [running IOS 12.3(5a)] small office router with
"Fair-Weight" queueing enabled. Works great. The nice thing about
Fair-Weight queueing is that it dynamically adapts to lower the priority
of higher demand traffic (e.g. large downloads). If you want quality
stick
Kenneth Padgett wrote:
I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to use for home
offices.
It should work for a scenario in which there are 3 computers and 2 SIP
phones, handling QoS so that the phones always have higher priority
traffic
than the PCs. (and not rely on the phones to do
I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to use for home offices.
It should work for a scenario in which there are 3 computers and 2 SIP
phones, handling QoS so that the phones always have higher priority traffic
than the PCs. (and not rely on the phones to do the QoS because some PCs
easily (Linksys type of product)
Mike
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Olivier
*Sent:* Thursday, January 04, 2007 15:56
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Best inexpensi
nsive home office router for
VoIP(QoS with maybe PoE)
Having QoS on your router is valuable to prevent some large download
from buggering your calls though.
Isn't QoS only useful to prevent large uploads, as download rely on ISP
router prioritizing Voice ove
Having QoS on your router is valuable to prevent some large download
from buggering your calls though.
Isn't QoS only useful to prevent large uploads, as download rely on ISP
router prioritizing Voice over Data ?
Cheers
___
--Bandwidth and Colocatio
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 13:32
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best inexpensive home office router for
VoIP(QoS with maybe PoE)
Mike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to
Mike wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to use for home
offices. It should work for a scenario in which there are 3 computers
and 2 SIP phones, handling QoS so that the phones always have higher
priority traffic than the PCs. (and not rely on the phones to do the
11 matches
Mail list logo
