Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
You guys all sound like you're talking about AstManProxy.
See:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=AstManProxy
I'm not saying it is the solution to your problem per se, but I can't
help but think
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system
On 5/18/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 4:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
-users] asterisk manager interface stability
Neat. So the clients use a polling model? Individual clients then
query only for events that are interesting?
Warm Regards,
Lee
Yes, the clients only connect to the MySQL database and can query the
events as they need
-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 6:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
On 5/18/07, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/18/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
Neat. So the clients use a polling model? Individual clients then
query only for events that are interesting?
Warm Regards,
Lee
Yes, the clients only connect to the MySQL database and can query the
events
Dean Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 4:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface
If it's not stable what needs to be done to improve this? What are the
issues? What are the alternatives (eg is Adhearsion an alternative here)
I am about to start looking into a project that requires every user to
have AMI access so looking to fund development in this space.
Regards,
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the client
from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+ clients connected
to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with FreePBX/Trixbox
especially generates vast amounts of output that has to be generated on
why not do it via an snmp interface?
If you spend the time building an solid snmp base you would open up
for an easier world of custom gui's as well as possibly some cleaner
ties into an nms infrastructure.
On May 16, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with
Quoting Bryan Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why not do it via an snmp interface?
If you spend the time building an solid snmp base you would open up
for an easier world of custom gui's as well as possibly some cleaner
ties into an nms infrastructure.
you have my vote on that implementation
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with
FreePBX/Trixbox especially generates vast amounts of output that
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 11:43, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with
Jenkins
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step
where sending of
Actions does not require an actual Telnet conneciton to the
AMI, but I
think to be able to handle larger numbers of concurrent
connections
On 5/16/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Florell wrote:
The issue has more to do with the sheer amount of data passed to the
client from within the Asterisk application when you have 50-100+
clients connected to the AMI on full output mode. Running a system with
FreePBX/Trixbox
(352) 392-0171 Ext. 221
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lee Jenkins
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability
The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step
where sending of
Actions does not require
18 matches
Mail list logo
