Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-09 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:43:34AM +1100, Mark Edwards wrote: Hey Waldo. AFAIK there is quite a lot of scope for tuning the compression of speex - just as there is for mp3. I have no doubt that if you tune complexity, quality and bitrate parameters you will be able to get that filesize down

RE : [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-09 Thread Olivier Taylor
-users@lists.digium.com Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:43:34AM +1100, Mark Edwards wrote: Hey Waldo. AFAIK there is quite a lot of scope for tuning the compression of speex - just as there is for mp3. I have no doubt that if you tune complexity, quality

RE: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Quark IT - Hilton Travis
Hi Waldo, Doesn't * record to .gsm file initially and then convert these to .wav later? I may be totally off the mark here, and if I am, I welcome the correction. In that case, why not leave the files in .gsm format instead of translating them into another lossy format? Obviously if * records

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
Hilton, AFAIK, you can optionally record in gsm. However, I think * won't do it natively. It will do -in and -out wav files, soxmix them together and then convert them to gsm. I'm offloading all of that to a different machine and just leaving * to create the raw -in and -out wav files.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread BJ Weschke
Check out the new app_mixmonitor app with 1.2b2. It produces one file that is mixed already. On 11/8/05, Waldo Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hilton, AFAIK, you can optionally record in gsm. However, I think * won't do it natively. It will do -in and -out wav files, soxmix them together

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
I'm using it for originating calls but the problem I have is that most of the recordings I have are from automatically recorded from the Queue command (in queues.conf), so I don't know if you can tell in queues.conf to use MixMonitor. Thanks, Waldo On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:50 AM, BJ Weschke

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
for speech archiving. Mark -Original Message- From: BJ Weschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 8 November 2005 5:52 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG You're probably not going to be violating any patent

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread BJ Weschke
I think you can't, yet. However, if you're using AgentCallBackLogin you should be able to run a mixmonitor on the dial out back to the Agent's interface just prior to connecting them. On 11/8/05, Waldo Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using it for originating calls but the problem I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
Yes, but I'm not using AgentCallBackLogin. Thanks, Waldo On Nov 8, 2005, at 11:40 AM, BJ Weschke wrote: I think you can't, yet. However, if you're using AgentCallBackLogin you should be able to run a mixmonitor on the dial out back to the Agent's interface just prior to connecting them.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Mark Edwards
to whack mp3 for filesize. Cheers, Mark. -Original Message- From: Waldo Rubinstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 3:36 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG I tried Speex and the quality

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-08 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
] Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 3:36 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG I tried Speex and the quality is much better than using lame to convert to mp3 or the ogg version. File compression is still better in mp3 than speex (mp3

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-07 Thread BJ Weschke
You're probably not going to be violating any patent protections by using OGG instead of MP3. As far as compression goes, I've found the difference between the two of them to be negligible. I've always used OGG when possible to stay IP safe. On 11/7/05, Waldo Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-07 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
Thanks - Waldo On Nov 7, 2005, at 1:52 PM, BJ Weschke wrote: You're probably not going to be violating any patent protections by using OGG instead of MP3. As far as compression goes, I've found the difference between the two of them to be negligible. I've always used OGG when possible to stay

RE: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-07 Thread Mark Edwards
Weschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 8 November 2005 5:52 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG You're probably not going to be violating any patent protections by using OGG instead of MP3. As far as compression goes

Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG

2005-11-07 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MP3 or OGG You're probably not going to be violating any patent protections by using OGG instead of MP3. As far as compression goes, I've found the difference between the two of them to be negligible. I've always used OGG when possible to stay IP