Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Architecture Group
On 04/30/05 02:42 Matt Roth said the following:
Does anyone have an interest in forming a hardware architecture group?
absolutely !
It seems that Asterisk is so tightly linked to specialized hardware and
its corresponding architecture
I think that would be a great idea. The only problem I see is that
Asterisk is growing its feature set and maturing at such a dynamic
rate, that I don't know in many cases, where to point the finger at.
Sometimes it's stability of the CVS version, sometimes it's stability
of Digium or
On 4/29/05, Daniel Salama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that would be a great idea. The only problem I see is that
Asterisk is growing its feature set and maturing at such a dynamic
rate, that I don't know in many cases, where to point the finger at.
Sometimes it's stability of the CVS
Does anyone have any experience with servers from siliconmechanics.com?
Are they reliable? How does * run on them?
Thanks
- Daniel
On Apr 29, 2005, at 4:22 PM, snacktime wrote:
Personally I would buy an * box from someone like asaservers.com. At
least companies like that really know their
At 4:57 PM -0400 on 4/29/05, Daniel Salama wrote:
On Apr 29, 2005, at 4:22 PM, snacktime wrote:
Personally I would buy an * box from someone like asaservers.com. At
least companies like that really know their hardware, and if you tell
them the common issues with * they could probably put together
Sounds like a good idea to me. I would watch it.
Race Vanderdecken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Roth
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
On 04/30/05 02:42 Matt Roth said the following:
Does anyone have an interest in forming a hardware architecture group?
absolutely !
It seems that Asterisk is so tightly linked to specialized hardware and
its corresponding architecture that developing the software alone is
insufficient for its
