Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-08 Thread Time Bandit
As I recall, should channels start as channel=2 and not channel=2? I have all mine config'ed channel = 2 and it works fine... Greg Yes, thanks for the correction. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-08 Thread gw
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID Ok, so the scope of the configuration is from channel= to channel= statement with the configuration for the channel coming before the channel statement

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-06 Thread Zachary Whitley
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 11:36 -0500, Larry Shields wrote: Check your zapata.conf file. Your terminal profile options section under [channels] should be ended by adding the associated channel, i.e. channel = 1 Sample two port config: [channels] ; ; Default language ; language=en ;

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-06 Thread Andrew Latham
No real start, Channel ends and the following is assumed to be the next channel. On 8/6/05, Zachary Whitley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 11:36 -0500, Larry Shields wrote: Check your zapata.conf file. Your terminal profile options section under [channels] should be ended by

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-06 Thread Zachary Whitley
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:34 -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: No real start, Channel ends and the following is assumed to be the next channel. Ok, so the scope of the configuration is from channel= to channel= statement with the configuration for the channel coming before the channel statement.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-06 Thread Andrew Latham
yuppers... On 8/6/05, Zachary Whitley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:34 -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: No real start, Channel ends and the following is assumed to be the next channel. Ok, so the scope of the configuration is from channel= to channel= statement with

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-06 Thread Time Bandit
Ok, so the scope of the configuration is from channel= to channel= statement with the configuration for the channel coming before the channel statement. As in... these=are configs=for the=first channel=1 these=are configs=for the=second channel=2 In fact, all the settings that

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

2005-08-06 Thread Zachary Whitley
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 20:55 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I recall, should channels start as channel=2 and not channel=2? I have all mine config'ed channel = 2 and it works fine... Greg That's correct. My mistake. ___ Asterisk-Users