TDMoE without Asterisk?
Regards.
Angel
- Original Message
From: Zoa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2006 2:21:37 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 200+ analog phones connected to FXS
Take a look at Channel Banks
On 11/30/06, Vieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find out the best way to replace one of
our hardware PBXs. It currently has 200+ analog phones
connected to it. The idea is to take advantage of the
already installed phone cables (big building) so I'm
On nov/30/2006, Vieri wrote:
Is there another way of doing this (hopefully cheaper
and more convenient)?
VoIP Gateways with 48 FXS ports.
--
Paco Brufal[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServiTux Servicios Informáticos S.L.
Tel. 966 160 600 / Fax. 966 160 601
I think It would be cheaper to use dedicated VoIP PSTN Gateways, such as
audiocodes or similar (audiocodes is actually a bad example, as their not that
cheap). But dedicated ATA hardware with 24 or more ports.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
You could put at least two Rhino quad t1 cards and that would give you
8 times 24 ports and I heard of one with those cards plus a dual t1
card which is 240 extensions on one server.
this would take up 3 pci slots.
on Thursday 11/30/2006 Jon Schøpzinsky([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
I think It would
Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] 200+ analog phones connected to FXS modules
You could put at least two Rhino quad t1 cards and that would give you
8 times 24 ports and I heard of one with those cards plus a dual t1
card which is 240 extensions on one server.
this would take up 3 pci slots
You could go for 2 quad pri cards + channel banks or for TDMoE or usb
channel banks.
The last option would be the cheaper and more scalable one imho
www.spidermux.org
www.xorcom.com
Joachim
John covici wrote:
You could put at least two Rhino quad t1 cards and that would give you
8 times 24
?
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John covici
Sent: 30. november 2006 12:07
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] 200+ analog phones connected to FXS modules
You
Or you could use a couple of these boxes:
http://www.xorcom.com/astribank/features-32.html
On 11/30/06, Vieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find out the best way to replace one of
our hardware PBXs. It currently has 200+ analog phones
connected to it. The idea is to take advantage of
On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:13, Zoa wrote:
You could go for 2 quad pri cards + channel banks or for TDMoE or usb
channel banks.
The last option would be the cheaper and more scalable one imho
The scale here is already bordering on unrealistic. I wouldn't expect them to
want to make this
Interesting product, I didn't know about this one until just now. I've heard
that TDMoE is more trouble than it's worth, though, and may eventually be
phased out of Asterisk. Can anyone from Digium give some more information or
suggestions?
-A.
I'm not from digium but am the proud
Hi
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:59:13PM -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:13, Zoa wrote:
You could go for 2 quad pri cards + channel banks or for TDMoE or usb
channel banks.
[ disclaimer: I work for the company that makes the USB channel bank
which was mentioned
You can get a basic VOIP phone for the same price that it will cost you for
a FXS port. As far as wiring you can go with a bit more expensive phone and
get a dual port with POE (if they have an existing computer network).
- Original Message -
From: Vieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
- Original Message -
From: Vieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] 200+ analog phones
connected to FXS modules
I am trying to find out the best way to replace one
of
our hardware PBXs.
14 matches
Mail list logo
