Re: [asterisk-users] Analog FXO or IAX DIDS for new facility?

2009-07-23 Thread Danny Nicholas
My .02 - IAX may not be an option and is probably not a good one if it is. It requires a good bit of overhead to work reliably and well. You won't go wrong using SIP DID's, but if you use Analog FXO, I'd go for an 8 or 16 port card and make sure you get the card away from any existing IRQ's,

Re: [asterisk-users] Analog FXO or IAX DIDS for new facility?

2009-07-23 Thread randulo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Danny Nicholasda...@debsinc.com wrote: My .02 - IAX may not be an option and is probably not a good one if it is. It requires a good bit of overhead to work reliably and well.  You won't go wrong using SIP DID's, but if you use Analog FXO, I'd go for an 8 or 16

Re: [asterisk-users] Analog FXO or IAX DIDS for new facility?

2009-07-23 Thread Paul Hales
In australia, I would usually suggest a mix of E1 and SIP for calls - it doesn't cost any money to receive calls via E1, and redundancy is an old, valuable friend of mine. PaulH Stephen Fierbaugh (PBT) wrote: I am a Linux sysadmin who has been tasked with developing the phone system for our