We use Linksys/Sipura phones, and do mass provisioning via tftp and
http.
There is no need for a compiler for the SPA-841, 941, 942, 3000, or
2000 phones at least; I don't have direct experience with others. We
feed a raw XML configuration file to the phone via a cgi-bin script
which receives the
Aastra are a delight -- no need for a compiler (like the Grandstream and
Linksys phones) -- and extremely well documented configuration files.
--
George Pajari, netVOICE communications604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102)
Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102)
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, George Pajari wrote:
Aastra are a delight -- no need for a compiler (like the Grandstream and
Linksys phones) -- and extremely well documented configuration files.
While I agree that Grandstream phones might not be the easiest things in
the world, I did find this
MF wrote:
Best and easiest provisioning I´ve found imho is Snom, great web
interfase , followed by Polycom (web interfase used to be poor and slow,
but once you set it up, works very well)
Polycoms are great if you use the cfg files over tftp.
-s
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dovid B
*Sent:* Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:21 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Best phone for easy provisioning
I liked polycom a lot.
- Original Message -
*From:* Rod Bacon mailto
I know Brett and Jurgen have been pretty happy with the Snom's - Brett
even wrote an auto-provision utility for the Snom's at one time.
later,
PaulH
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 19:45 +1100, Rod Bacon wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations for a phone that has easy to
understand/implement
Paul Hales wrote:
I know Brett and Jurgen have been pretty happy with the Snom's - Brett
even wrote an auto-provision utility for the Snom's at one time.
Yes, look at the latest Trixbox for the basic SNOM templates and then
off you go.
You setup a tftp server (easy), the phone looks for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm using a Thomason ST2030. Had difficulties in the beginning, but
after a firmware upgrade it works fine. And autoprovisioning works good.
Most of the parameters are described in their official (marked as
confidential) admin documentation from
Of Christoph
Fürstaller
Sent: 08 February 2007 10:34
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best phone for easy provisioning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm using a Thomason ST2030. Had difficulties in the beginning, but
after
Chris, (or others), do you have any negative experience with Thomson
2030? it looks very promising!
I hesitate between thomson and linksys spa 922/942,
I'm not sure, what is better for bussines use :-\
snoms are probably also good, but functionality/price ratio is, imho,
better for thomson or
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best phone for easy provisioning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm using a Thomason ST2030. Had difficulties in the beginning, but
after a firmware upgrade it works fine. And autoprovisioning works good.
Most
I liked polycom a lot.
- Original Message -
From: Rod Bacon
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Best phone for easy provisioning
Does anyone have any recommendations for a phone that has easy to
Best and easiest provisioning I´ve found imho is Snom, great web
interfase , followed by Polycom (web interfase used to be poor and slow,
but once you set it up, works very well)
Dovid B escribió:
I liked polycom a lot.
- Original Message -
*From:* Rod Bacon mailto:[EMAIL
Dovid B wrote:
I liked polycom a lot.
- Original Message -
*From:* Rod Bacon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Sent:* Thursday, February 08, 2007 10:45 AM
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Best phone
great
i join you Thomson ST is a good choice, also you can see linksys
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
really you can't make a difference between them, i like thomson
2007/2/8, Pavel Jezek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris, (or others), do you have any negative experience with Thomson
2030? it looks very promising!
I hesitate between thomson and linksys spa 922/942,
I'm not sure, what is better for
for massive deployment phone provisioning/fw updating through web
interface is not optimal,
best way is via config files/templates periodicaly downloaded from
central tftp/http server...
PJ
MF wrote:
Best and easiest provisioning I´ve found imho is Snom, great web
interfase , followed by
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dovid B
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best phone for easy provisioning
I liked polycom a lot.
- Original Message -
From: Rod
I can only speak for Aastra phones.
Central provisioning is very easy. All you need is one simple text file on
a TFTP, FTP, or HTTP server which all the phones point to. To customize
individual phones you add a second text file for each phone you want
customized. The custom text file is given
I can only speak for Aastra phones.
Central provisioning is very easy. All you need is one simple text
file on a TFTP, FTP, or HTTP server which all the phones point to.
To customize individual phones you add a second text file for each
phone you want customized. The custom text file
-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Best phone for easy provisioning
We used Aastra's for a good while, but gave up on them (and switched to
Cisco). Aastra's seem cheaper up front (hardware costs), but the time
wasted chasing firmware bugs, lack of documentation, and poor support
21 matches
Mail list logo
