On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:21:24PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Hello,
Getting this error on dahdi_cfg. Reverting to 2.8 the error goes away:
*line 15: Unable to create 'dahdi_cfg' mutex.*
Is this a problem?
Thanks in advance.
Full detail:
[ebox] dahdi_cfg -vvv
Hello Shaun,
This system is a custom distro, based on debian and currently built around
kernel 2.6.35.8. Is sem_open introduced only in DAHDI 2.9 ?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:21:24PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
Maybe the problem is lack of tmpfs?
statfs(/dev/shm, 0xbff88568) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
Is this a new requirement for DAHDI?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Shaun,
This system is a custom
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:49:49PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Hello Shaun,
This system is a custom distro, based on debian and currently built around
kernel 2.6.35.8. Is sem_open introduced only in DAHDI 2.9 ?
Yes. It was added in [1] in order to prevent errors when multiple
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Maybe the problem is lack of tmpfs?
statfs(/dev/shm, 0xbff88568) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
Is this a new requirement for DAHDI?
tmpfs is not a requirement per-se, but it's how most POSIX
Well, I created /dev/shm and mounted tmpfs on it, and the problem is no
more. Just creating /dev/shm was not enough.
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Maybe the problem is
Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I created /dev/shm and mounted tmpfs on it, and the problem is no
more. Just creating /dev/shm was not enough.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:12:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
thanks.
Not really. There are other ways that dahdi_cfg could serialize
itself, but POSIX semaphores are widely deployed on systems that are
installing
Ok thanks Shaun!
Best regards.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:12:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
thanks.
Not really. There are other ways
