It will auto-complete if you hit tab, just like the shell. But I
would recommend against it. I can't really think of a good reason to
do it. 'sip show peer 268' I can remember to see that status of
extension 268 when somebody calls and says I can't dial 268.
Whereas 'sip show peer
On 20 Nov 2008, at 16:14, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Any reason you want to use the MAC address?
Bet he used to use Cisco ;)
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
Olivier schrieb:
For a long time, I was wondering if I should use MAC address instead of
Extension number to identify SIP endpoints (as I'm mostly not using
softphones).
Before diving into this, I wondered how people using MAC address are using
CLI as it seems more natural and simple to
2008/11/20 Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olivier schrieb:
For a long time, I was wondering if I should use MAC address instead of
Extension number to identify SIP endpoints (as I'm mostly not using
softphones).
Before diving into this, I wondered how people using MAC address are
2008/11/20 Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It will auto-complete if you hit tab, just like the shell. But I
would recommend against it. I can't really think of a good reason to
do it. 'sip show peer 268' I can remember to see that status of
extension 268 when somebody calls and says I
On Nov 20, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Olivier wrote:
2008/11/20 Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any reason you want to use the MAC address? If it is just for easy
provisioning, I just put a MAC address field in the realtime SIP table
and use a php script to take the phone's MAC address and feed it
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Olivier schrieb:
For a long time, I was wondering if I should use MAC address instead of
Extension number to identify SIP endpoints (as I'm mostly not using
softphones).
Before diving into this, I wondered how people using MAC address are using
CLI as it seems
2008/11/20 Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I use the MAC-x wherex=the line appearance number. MAC-a for
first line appearance, MAC-b for 2nd, etc.
Is it easy to use (CLI, logs...) ?
Would you step back to an extension-based identification scheme ?
Olivier wrote:
2008/11/20 Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I use the MAC-x wherex=the line appearance number. MAC-a for
first line appearance, MAC-b for 2nd, etc.
Is it easy to use (CLI, logs...) ?
Would you step back to an extension-based identification scheme ?
I
Eric ManxPower Wieling schrieb:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Olivier schrieb:
For a long time, I was wondering if I should use MAC address instead of
Extension number to identify SIP endpoints (as I'm mostly not using
softphones).
Before diving into this, I wondered how people using MAC address
10 matches
Mail list logo
