I, too, have heard about that best practice of using different
channels for different AP's on the same SSID. As far as I can tell,
This is standard textbook stuff. Read Cisco press's 'Deploying License
Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks' by Jack Unger.
it's BS. I don't know who started it, but
The WAP54's have a 'repeater' mode which I've used on occasion.
Which is all well and good, but they use WDS which doesn't work with WPA.
Not on the WAP54's anyway (I learned the hard way on that one). Some
vendors have working solutions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Feb 2007, at 15:01, Noah Miller wrote:
The WAP54's have a 'repeater' mode which I've used on occasion.
Which is all well and good, but they use WDS which doesn't work
with WPA.
Not on the WAP54's anyway (I learned the hard way on that
I, too, have heard about that best practice of using different
channels for different AP's on the same SSID. As far as I can tell,
This is standard textbook stuff. Read Cisco press's 'Deploying License
Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks' by Jack Unger.
it's BS. I don't know who started it,
Hi All -
I have two APs (Apple AirPorts) sending on the _same_ channel.
Handover works perfect with no discernible loss of connectivity or
audio using a Siemens SL75. The handover cannot even be noticed.
as I know, best practice says, that neighboring AP should use _non
overlapping_
On 15 Feb 2007, at 09:54, Alberto Pastore wrote:
Pavel Jezek ha scritto:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I have two APs (Apple AirPorts) sending on the _same_ channel.
Handover works perfect with no discernible loss of connectivity
or audio using a Siemens SL75. The handover cannot even be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Feb 2007, at 01:39, Leo Ann Boon wrote:
Bruce Reeves wrote:
In my experience having ap's with the same SSID and 3 channels of
separation overlapping worked if the phone could roam.
Recommended is 5 channels of separation.
Ronald,
Just be
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I have two APs (Apple AirPorts) sending on the _same_ channel.
Handover works perfect with no discernible loss of connectivity or
audio using a Siemens SL75. The handover cannot even be noticed.
as I know, best practice says, that neighboring AP should use _non
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Feb 2007, at 10:23, Pavel Jezek wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I have two APs (Apple AirPorts) sending on the _same_ channel.
Handover works perfect with no discernible loss of connectivity or
audio using a Siemens SL75. The handover
Pavel Jezek ha scritto:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I have two APs (Apple AirPorts) sending on the _same_ channel.
Handover works perfect with no discernible loss of connectivity or
audio using a Siemens SL75. The handover cannot even be noticed.
as I know, best practice says, that neighboring
In my experience having ap's with the same SSID and 3 channels of separation
overlapping worked if the phone could roam.
On 2/14/07, Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody tell me how I can set-up multiple access points with
overlapping coverage, so that a moving WiFi phone user
Bruce Reeves wrote:
In my experience having ap's with the same SSID and 3 channels of
separation overlapping worked if the phone could roam.
Recommended is 5 channels of separation.
Ronald,
Just be aware that even if the phone supports AP roaming, there's no
guarantee that the call will
12 matches
Mail list logo
