Hi Steve Sokol,
Thanks for inform. I will join it.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Steve Sokol sso...@digium.com wrote:
Greetings Asterisk Users,
I'm happy to announce that Russell Bryant and Leif Madsen have volunteered
to host the next Asterisk Tech Tips webinar, next Thursday April 21
On Wednesday 13 Apr 2011, Thorsten Göllner wrote:
It should work - I think. BUT I am not really sure what will happen, if
the child process exits. The child works with a copy of all asterisk
ressources given to it, when forking. So when the child dies, perhaps
asterisk will do a hangup or
Hi.
To open the door I'm suggesting you to use Arduino if you can't have a
PC near the door opener contacts.
Arduino is something useful for implementing this type of networked
embedded stuffs.
It's not so expensive and easy to use for people familiar with C, C++
and a little bit of electronics.
On 4/14/11 1:04 AM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:00:36PM -0700, Jian Gao wrote:
Centos 5.6 came out. Any one tried to update to the 5.6 yet?
I am running Asterisk 1.8 and is there any risk to upgrade to Centos 5.6?
I'm not sure about Asterisk in general, but if you use
Under 'Phone' there is a new 'Action URL' section (version 60 of
firmware).
There are a lot of phone 'events' that can call something else. Eg. if
the phone goes off-hook (just off-hook) an 'event' is triggered. This
'event' calls a script (in my case) that changes a BLF on reception to
busy
On 14/04/2011 7:25 AM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 13/04/2011 19:54, Larry Moore ha scritto:
That is because the remote endpoint, eutelia, will need to detect the
Fax Tones and send the T.38 ReINVITE to you, they may not have T.38
enabled.
Uhm... it's very unlikely.
I made a suggestion on how
Il 14/04/2011 12:25, Larry Moore ha scritto:
I made a suggestion on how you could check this i.e. have your incoming
call go directly to the fax extension, my 1.8.3.2 installation
immediately negotiates a T.38 connection in this sceanrio, of course I
enabled the fallback option so it will use
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
On 4/14/11 1:04 AM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:00:36PM -0700, Jian Gao wrote:
Centos 5.6 came out. Any one tried to update to the 5.6 yet?
I am running Asterisk 1.8 and is there any risk to upgrade to Centos 5.6?
I'm not sure
On 14/04/2011 6:57 PM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 14/04/2011 12:25, Larry Moore ha scritto:
I made a suggestion on how you could check this i.e. have your incoming
call go directly to the fax extension, my 1.8.3.2 installation
immediately negotiates a T.38 connection in this sceanrio, of course I
Hi
Does anybody have a idea how I could set sip headers when using call files?
I have to call out a specific trunk so I cant use local as the trunk
what i'm trying todo is send out calls as anonymous but at the itsp it
should be filed as being called out thru a specific DID and not the main DID
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Israel Gottlieb isr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Does anybody have a idea how I could set sip headers when using call files?
I have to call out a specific trunk so I cant use local as the trunk
what i'm trying todo is send out calls as anonymous but at the itsp
Yes, you can do that with call file. You need to specify channel
variable
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Israel Gottlieb isr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Israel Gottlieb isr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Does anybody have a idea how I could set sip
Il 14/04/2011 14:34, Larry Moore ha scritto:
allow=alaw,g729 ; alaw required for T.30 facsimile if T.38 fails to
I didn't understand the point. If you enable both alaw and g729 it will
simply use the preferred one: if it's g729 tone based detection will
still not work, if it's alaw I will still
We have a client that currently has a Microsoft Lync setup. I must admit I know
nothing about this setup.
What we would like to be able to do is allow the phones on desks connected to
this server the ability to dial something that would allow the phone to access
an asterisk box to be able to
Hi,
I have configured few users in my system with '-' E.g. 1000-1001,
1000-1002 etc..
I am successfully able to registered as 1000-1001 and dials number
937575346. The other end sees 10001001 (missing '-') as a caller.
I did verified in the packet capture surprisingly it is
Yes you can. Lync can not do registration and it is a trick to setup.
Bryant
On Apr 14, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Jim Dickenson dicken...@cfmc.com wrote:
We have a client that currently has a Microsoft Lync setup. I must admit I
know nothing about this setup.
What we would like to be able to do
Hi All,
We are running asterisk 1.8.3.2 and if in future i need to upgrade with new
release then how should i upgrade it. The reason i am asking is i did lots of
customization in make menuselect so do i need to keep all option remember or is
there anyway i just copy paste existing
On 14/04/2011 10:16 PM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 14/04/2011 14:34, Larry Moore ha scritto:
allow=alaw,g729 ; alaw required for T.30 facsimile if T.38 fails to
I didn't understand the point. If you enable both alaw and g729 it will
simply use the preferred one: if it's g729 tone based detection
We have a variable set for each user/peer/whatnot that signals what the
outbound caller-id should be sent as with our carrier.
When someone dials a followme extension, this does not appear to be carried
over for when the calls reach an outside caller, and we see the outbound
caller-id being set
19 matches
Mail list logo
