Dear Matt, nice to meet you!
Thank you for your prompt response.
The Avaya's phone 9608 and 9641 don't work in UDP, when status is just
trying register, but not happen.
So, with TCP they register correctly on Asterisk, version 1.8.32.3.
The calls works fine, but other features not, like hints,
btw info from my segfault
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/asterisk -f -vvvg -c'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 fix_result_types (stmt=0x9741730)
at /usr/src/debug/mysql-connector-odbc-5.3.6-src/driver/utility.c:139
139 irrec->row.field= field;
Dne
If you are using PJSIP, you should be able to define a different transport
for each source IP that you want to use and simply tie the endpoint to your
provider to the appropriate transport. Obviously, you'd need to define the
IP on the interface as well. You could use the same interface with
Original Subject: Questions... connecting Asterisk to the World
In short, adding the line
> overlapdial=yes
in chan_dahdi.conf changed everything!!
I wrote:
> WITH my Asterisks server in the middle of the exchange...
> A phone connected to the switch requests an "Outgoing" line
> by dialing
I have two Polycom phone configured with Asterisk server, both use
transport=tls
My provision server is FTPS, I have phone5006.cfg & phone5007.cfg
If I enable transport tls on both phones I get the following error:
[2016-14:03:52] WARNING[26566]: chan_sip.c:14967 check_auth:
username
after downgrade to 13.8.2
May 27 18:21:06 ast kernel: asterisk[16286]: segfault at 1010024 ip
b49162cd sp bfac0940 error 4 in libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0[b48f1000+12e000]
after downgrade to 13.7.2
asterisk is ok
Dne 27.5.2016 v 18:09 Marek Červenka napsal(a):
btw info from my segfault
Core was
hi,
i have the same problems as in
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25833
my current combination is centos 6 32-bit, unixODBC 2.3.2 (recompiled
from fedora20), mysql 5.1.73, mysql-connector-odbc 5.1.5, asterisk 13.9.1
i tried update to mysql-connector-odbc 5.3.6 from oracle
humm, ok.
Thanks very much
2016-05-27 19:56 GMT-03:00, Richard Mudgett :
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Vitor Mazuco
> wrote:
>
>> Hi to everybody
>>
>> my system is be attack, but I dont know what this means
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> [May 27 15:52:33]
If I had just two such users, I would be fine.
But having 10-20 or even more? It is not a nice, scalable solution...
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Neeraj Chand
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016
Hi to everybody
my system is be attack, but I dont know what this means
[May 27 15:12:24] WARNING[26018] chan_skinny.c: Partial data received,
waiting (76 bytes read of 786)
[chan_skinny.c] skinny_session[0][C-] skinny_session:
WARNING[May 27 15:52:32] Asterisk 13.8.0 built by root @
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Vitor Mazuco
wrote:
> Hi to everybody
>
> my system is be attack, but I dont know what this means
>
>
> [May 27 15:52:33] WARNING[2306] chan_sip.c: !!! PLEASE NOTE: Setting
> 'nat' for a peer/user that differs from the global setting
11 matches
Mail list logo