Re: [asterisk-users] FFA SendFax rejects T.38 reINVITE (488 Not acceptable here)

2010-11-02 Thread VoIP Question
We're learning all the time and made some significant progress and some very nice calls scenarios, but specifically with this issue, is there anything we can do to solve the interop problem with this end-point? Thanks. Original Message Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FFA

Re: [asterisk-users] FFA SendFax rejects T.38 reINVITE (488 Not acceptable here)

2010-11-02 Thread VoIP Question
Thanks Kevin, We managed to get the ReceiveFAX going, while making some minor changes to the code, like, for example, using the ${UNIQUEID} for the file name. Regards, Michael Original Message Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FFA SendFax rejects T.38 reINVITE (488 Not

[asterisk-users] Ring Freq

2010-11-02 Thread Giampaolo TUCCI
Hi I'm sorry for the my trivial quest. I Have asterisk 1.4 with TDM 400 with FXO and FXS, and works fine from several months. Now I want to connect a device to TDMFXS that want a ring frequecy of 25 hz to activate: i am italian, and usually the ring freq is 20 hz. The other time (I have used that

Re: [asterisk-users] Music On Hold Help

2010-11-02 Thread ayodele abejide
On my own version of sox (14.3.0), says -w option is not allowed ABEJIDE, Ayodele A. (CCNA) +2348039269311 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:39:43 -0700 From: asterisk@sedwards.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Music On Hold Help Un-top-posting... On

[asterisk-users] Sip, Qualify=200 that doesn't qualify. How to signal this state to the Peer

2010-11-02 Thread Shaun Wingrin
Say, If bandwidth e.g. ADSL goes fuzzy, is there a way to force * to unregister the Peers? I noticed with qualify=200 for example, even if latency goes above and * shows Lagged and then UNREACHABLE The peer's calls are still accepted. Is there a way to automatically prevent this? Thanks

Re: [asterisk-users] BLF in Asterisk 1.4.*

2010-11-02 Thread Asterisk User
Thanks Zeeshan, I have some problems with 1.4.25 so I'll try 1.4.27. Have a nice day! On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Zeeshan Zakaria zisha...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, it works fine in 1.4.22 and 1.4.27 and 1.4.35. Zeeshan A Zakaria -- www.ilovetovoip.com www.pbxforall.com (beta) On

Re: [asterisk-users] Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread adamk
Hi guys, i've seen this too, nagios woke me up because it was an extremely high volume of tries. I took a peek into the logs and saw that the attacker's script was trying extensions from 1 to and then random names. I can see the log in the messages file that several attempts failed

Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread C F
Joel, after sending my previous posts I did realize your points might have some validity - and hence I owe you an apology - and that is if you are a telco or hosted pbx provider then strict fail2ban is not that good of a solution. While I was talking strictly from a PBX vendors point of view,

Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of C F Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:06 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread jon pounder
I'm still on old-fashion copper-wire and have yet to experience the joy of SIP Trunk-ing and the type of issues discussed in this thread. My thought to share here is that outgoing calls should be easy for thoroughly authenticated users and impossible for others... Probably more

[asterisk-users] Asterisk, VoIP and Samsung iDCS100

2010-11-02 Thread Ronny Adsetts
Hi, Firstly, I'm new to Asterisk and am a system admin rather than a phone engineer. I've googled and read around but haven't been able to answer my questions sufficiently to buy hardware and get this thing set up. Secondly, if I've missed vital information from what is below, please let me

Re: [asterisk-users] DISA problem in 1.8.0

2010-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
- Original Message - When I call into my Asterisk box via my VoIP line (using gsm codec) and then try to make an outgoing DISA call over PSTN I get the following: [Nov 1 15:12:54] WARNING[17694]: chan_dahdi.c:8930 dahdi_write: Cannot handle frames in gsm format [Nov 1 15:12:54]

[asterisk-users] Feature Request for 1.10 - ISDN power-save mode

2010-11-02 Thread Olivier
Hi, In Europe many Telcos implement power-save mode (See http://www.isdn-test.de/ihhe12.htm#Heading37 and scroll down to 'Activation / Deactivation' for more information). Would you agree to have this feature added to the ones already discuused for next Asterisk release ? (See

Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread Cary Fitch
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jon pounder Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:24 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack I'm still

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk, VoIP and Samsung iDCS100

2010-11-02 Thread Roger Burton West
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:13:01PM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote: 3. Other ways? It all rather depends on what your proprietary system has been set up to do. (If you didn't already have the Samsung box, you wouldn't need to buy one.) Dedicated telephony hardware tends to be restricted in all

[asterisk-users] Need testing: chan_unistim improvements

2010-11-02 Thread Igor Goncharovsky
Hi All, During last three month I have worked on improving functionality of Nortel phones working with asterisk to replace existing Nortel station by asterisk. Many improvments done, listed below. I have only i2002 phone and unable to test if new version of channel correctly works with i2204

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk, VoIP and Samsung iDCS100

2010-11-02 Thread Ronny Adsetts
Roger Burton West said at 02/11/2010 16:35: On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:13:01PM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote: 3. Other ways? It all rather depends on what your proprietary system has been set up to do. (If you didn't already have the Samsung box, you wouldn't need to buy one.) Dedicated

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk, VoIP and Samsung iDCS100

2010-11-02 Thread William Stillwell (Lists)
Use Network LCR and PRI Card... I interfaced two Samsung iDCS 500 r2 into an asterisk box this way. I don't think Samsung has gotten SIP 100% open yet. I have since scrapped all the Samsung gear, and have a big pile of parts :D If you're talking 10 or 20 users on the 100, just scrap it, go

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk, VoIP and Samsung iDCS100

2010-11-02 Thread Ronny Adsetts
Gordon Henderson said at 02/11/2010 16:39: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Ronny Adsetts wrote: Firstly, I'm new to Asterisk and am a system admin rather than a phone engineer. I've googled and read around but haven't been able to answer my questions sufficiently to buy hardware and get this thing set

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk, VoIP and Samsung iDCS100

2010-11-02 Thread Roger Burton West
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 05:54:27PM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote: Would it be possible do you know to use the Samsung handsets with an Asterisk system? Is it worth even trying to save money here? (I've no idea of the cost of VoIP handsets for use with Asterisk). I've never heard of Samsung

Re: [asterisk-users] Issue with asterisk

2010-11-02 Thread Silver Thorne
Steve; You are so right - it was the end of the day, I was tired and pissy. Let me try this again: Version: ns211156*CLI core show version Asterisk 1.4.31 built by root @ some_server.foo.net on a x86_64 running Linux on 2010-06-10 14:32:34 UTC Name and version of endpoints involved: Sip

Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread Jai Rangi
Asterisk security has always been a big concern. I am sure most of asterisk pros have taken care of these type of attacks. For non pros I am sharing a shell script here. http://www.didforsale.com/blog/?p=253 If you care feel free is use it. -Jai On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Cary Fitch

Re: [asterisk-users] Issue with asterisk

2010-11-02 Thread Silver Thorne
Hey; I never thought of that. It is causing an issue for me. One SIP UA works fine - ring, forward, etc. While the other does not. I am a little clueless here - where would I start with this? Thanks Glen On 11/1/2010 19:15, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Hi! [Nov 1 19:55:49]

[asterisk-users] Asterisk community services powered by Atlassian tools

2010-11-02 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Some of you have already noticed we've chosen a number of Atlassian tools to provide services to the Asterisk and Asterisk SCF communities (Confluence, Crowd, Crucible, Fisheye and Bamboo). Of course, we're not alone in this since many other open source projects have chosen these tools as well,

[asterisk-users] IAX or SIP - connecting two Asterisk servers together

2010-11-02 Thread Silver Thorne
Hello Folks; Again, excuse my cluelessness. I have an Asterisk server in the US - and I want to connect it to one in Europe. Here is my scenario: 1. call a phone number, my Asterisk box in the US answers 2. perhaps a 'please wait' voice message 3. it dials an extension on the other

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX or SIP - connecting two Asterisk servers together

2010-11-02 Thread Roger Burton West
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 03:20:48PM -0400, Silver Thorne wrote: I am not looking for someone to do this for me, I am just not really sure how to get started. Perhaps some suggested reading, examples, etc? The simplest approach would be to skip the answering and just dial through immediately,

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX or SIP - connecting two Asterisk servers together

2010-11-02 Thread John Novack
Silver Thorne wrote: Hello Folks; Again, excuse my cluelessness. I have an Asterisk server in the US - and I want to connect it to one in Europe. Here is my scenario: 1. call a phone number, my Asterisk box in the US answers 2. perhaps a 'please wait' voice message 3. it dials

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX or SIP - connecting two Asterisk servers together

2010-11-02 Thread Paul Belanger
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Silver Thorne zora...@gmail.com wrote: Any help at all would be appreciated. DUNDi -- Paul Belanger | dCAP Polybeacon | Consultant Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) | Blog: http://blog.polybeacon.com | Twitter:

Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack

2010-11-02 Thread C F
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of C F Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:06 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -

[asterisk-users] ADSL Load Balancing

2010-11-02 Thread Dan Journo
Hi, I've got a client with two ADSL connections for redundancy. Is it possible to set up asterisk to connect to one SIP provider using both adsl connections and load balance between the two connections? Or to use one connection as the main one, and automatically fail over if the first

Re: [asterisk-users] ADSL Load Balancing

2010-11-02 Thread Duane Larson
Your router would have to do per-destination when it came to load balancing between the two dsl circuits. That way a single call could only use one dsl path. On Nov 2, 2010 7:36 PM, Dan Journo d...@keshercommunications.com wrote: Hi, I've got a client with two ADSL connections for

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and SIP a Provider in Brazil

2010-11-02 Thread Roberto Linck do Nascimento
I have sent an e-mail to this list (awaiting moderator approval by the size) talking about some difficult to make calls with a SIP Provider in Brazil. I'm new at this list and have no sure if I have posted my question in the right place. If this is not the channel to make this kind of question