Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime SIP peer status

2011-04-15 Thread Jonas Kellens
On 04/13/2011 09:18 PM, Rob Coward wrote: Rather than add extra overhead to your dialplan and the asterisk server, why not make use of the AMI and have a background process listening for the various events and updating your database accordingly ? See

[asterisk-users] sip error logging

2011-04-15 Thread Jeremy Kister
I recently noticed that asterisk is not logging unknown sip connections. I'm not sure if I've broken something or if asterisk itself has been broken. the last entry I have is: /var/log/asterisk/messages.9:[Feb 10 23:58:48] NOTICE[9868] chan_sip.c: Registration from 'sip:22942@10.0.0.3'

Re: [asterisk-users] sip error logging

2011-04-15 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 4/15/2011 3:39 AM, Jeremy Kister wrote: I recently noticed that asterisk is not logging unknown sip connections. I'm not sure if I've broken something or if asterisk itself has been broken. forgot to mention that I can replicate this behavior on 1.8.2.3 and 1.8.3.2 -- Jeremy Kister

Re: [asterisk-users] Existing Asterisk 1.8 upgrade with new release

2011-04-15 Thread Kirill Katsnelson
On 110414 1346, satish patel wrote: We are running asterisk 1.8.3.2 and if in future i need to upgrade with new release then how should i upgrade it. The reason i am asking is i did lots of customization in make menuselect so do i need to keep all option remember or is there anyway i just

[asterisk-users] Would a job posting be ok for this list?

2011-04-15 Thread Kirill Katsnelson
We are hiring a VoIP developer. Would it be within the list guidelines to post a position description? Not sure if that's in the scope of this list, but does not match asterisk-biz either. -kkm -- _ -- Bandwidth and

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime SIP peer status

2011-04-15 Thread Adolphe Cher-aime
Registry type Event will give you information about your peer. Adolphe Cher-aime From my Iphone On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Jonas Kellens jonas.kell...@telenet.be wrote: On 04/13/2011 09:18 PM, Rob Coward wrote: Rather than add extra overhead to your dialplan and the asterisk server,

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime SIP peer status

2011-04-15 Thread Jonas Kellens
On 04/15/2011 11:53 AM, Adolphe Cher-aime wrote: Registry type Event will give you information about your peer. Adolphe Cher-aime From my Iphone I don't find information on how this event tells me whether the SIP peer is occupied with a call or not. How can I capture the notify messages

[asterisk-users] How to get back park call

2011-04-15 Thread virendra bhati
Hi , How I will get my park call back? *1 ) features.conf * [general] parkext = 900; What extension to dial to park parkpos = 901-920 ; What extensions to park calls on. context = bhati-park *2) Extensions.conf * [incoming] include = bhati-park exten = XXX,1,Answer exten =

[asterisk-users] [OT] 802.11x roaming

2011-04-15 Thread Niccolò Belli
Hi, I'd like to replace my DECT + fxs phones with some wireless phones. Main problem is: what about the roaming from one ap to another? Do someone adopted the 802.11r standard? What APs and what phones do you suggest me? I'm open to suggestions but I'd like to avoid proprietary solutions, I don't

[asterisk-users] Friday April 15 at 12 Noon EDT

2011-04-15 Thread randulo
Hi all, You're welcome as always to join the talk on the VoIP Users Conference, VUC for short. VUC began as the Asterisk Users Conference but for obvious reasons, we changed the name in the first year, although Digium was our sponsor for three years. We still have plenty of you who are asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Friday April 15 at 12 Noon EDT

2011-04-15 Thread virendra bhati
Hi I want to join this conference but please tell me the topic of conference and the process of joining step by step. Please tell me the time in IST too On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, randulo rand...@randulo.com wrote: Hi all, You're welcome as always to join the talk on the VoIP Users

[asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Vlasis Hatzistavrou
Hello, On an Asterisk 1.4.33.1 in a simple scenario: [test] exten = _X.,1,Dial(SIP/12345@peer01,,,) exten = i,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten = t,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten = h,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) I have noticed that no matter what value we set in the Hangup(cause code) commands,

Re: [asterisk-users] Friday April 15 at 12 Noon EDT

2011-04-15 Thread randulo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, virendra bhati virbh...@gmail.com wrote: I want to join this conference but please tell me the topic of conference and the process of joining step by step. You're welcome to join us! All this information is at the top of the main site: http://vuc.me Please

[asterisk-users] If voice mail not found dialplan

2011-04-15 Thread Satish Patel
Hey guys, I have stdexten macro dialplan and I have to handle those who doesn't have voicemail box setup. Right now if someone call and if person unavailable the it's just hangup that call. I want it say person doest have vm setup yet. smthing like that. How should I handle this in my

Re: [asterisk-users] Friday April 15 at 12 Noon EDT

2011-04-15 Thread Satish Patel
Is this online conf? Or are there archived files we can review? -- Sent from my iPhone On Apr 15, 2011, at 8:06 AM, randulo rand...@randulo.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, virendra bhati virbh...@gmail.com wrote: I want to join this conference but please tell me the topic of

Re: [asterisk-users] Friday April 15 at 12 Noon EDT

2011-04-15 Thread randulo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Satish Patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote: Is this online conf? Or are there archived files we can review? There are over 300 recordings here: http://vuc.me :r -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] If voice mail not found dialplan

2011-04-15 Thread Doug Lytle
Satish Patel wrote: want it say person doest have vm setup yet. smthing like that. How should I handle this in my dialplan ? Here is a snippet of what I do: [s-NOANSWER] exten = s,1,Gosub(mailbox_exist,s,1) [mailbox_exist] exten = s,1,Set(_direct_vm=${ARG1}) exten =

[asterisk-users] Good by asterisk 1.4? Please not.

2011-04-15 Thread Kristijan Vrban
Security only fixes: 2011-04-21 So in six days, no more bugfix patches will committed into 1.4-branch :( Is a prolongation possible? Because 1.4 is so reliable now. It would be a great loss. And no, 1.8 is not (yet) a replacement. Kristijan --

Re: [asterisk-users] Good by asterisk 1.4? Please not.

2011-04-15 Thread Matt Riddell
On 16/04/11 12:33 AM, Kristijan Vrban wrote: Security only fixes: 2011-04-21 So in six days, no more bugfix patches will committed into 1.4-branch :( Is a prolongation possible? Because 1.4 is so reliable now. It would be a great loss. And no, 1.8 is not (yet) a replacement. It actually

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Jim Dickenson
My guess is since the call was never answered you should be looking at ${DIALSTATUS} -- Jim Dickenson mailto:dicken...@cfmc.com CfMC http://www.cfmc.com/ On Apr 15, 2011, at 5:02 AM, Vlasis Hatzistavrou wrote: Hello, On an Asterisk 1.4.33.1 in a simple scenario: [test] exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Good by asterisk 1.4? Please not.

2011-04-15 Thread Satish Patel
You know we don't have choise. I had remembered when we shifted 1.2 to first release of 1.4 and we had many issue. Same thing right now I'm dealing with 1.8 things take time to stabilized. Good luck!! -- Sent from my iPhone On Apr 15, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Kristijan Vrban

Re: [asterisk-users] Require dialplan

2011-04-15 Thread Matt Florell
ViciDial doesn't work that way, you have to use the agent web interface or the API to disposition a call. MATT--- On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:04 AM, mahesh katta maheshka...@flexydial.comwrote: Hi , In vicidial dialer I need small Dialplan require. when i call from hardphone , in that has

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Vlasis Hatzistavrou
Hello Jim, Thank you for the reply. The problem is not reading the ${HANGUPCAUSE} or the ${DIALSTATUS}. It is that the Hangup(cause) command seems to ignore its argument and just sends a 503 cause to the caller for all unanswered calls no matter what... Hangup(cause) was working as

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Jim Dickenson
If what you showed is your whole dialplan then none of the i or t or h extensions are going to be executed for a non answered call. -- Jim Dickenson mailto:dicken...@cfmc.com CfMC http://www.cfmc.com/ On Apr 15, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Vlasis Hatzistavrou wrote: Hello Jim, Thank you for the

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Steve Davies
On 15 April 2011 13:02, Vlasis Hatzistavrou vh...@kinetix.gr wrote: Hello, On an Asterisk 1.4.33.1 in a simple scenario: [test] exten = _X.,1,Dial(SIP/12345@peer01,,,) exten = i,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten = t,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten = h,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) I have

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Vlasis Hatzistavrou
The h extension is executed after the remote end peer01 rejects the call with a 408. I verified it by altering the dialplan as: [test] exten = _X.,1,Dial(SIP/12345@peer01,,,) exten = i,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten = t,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten = h,1,NoOp(Hangup cause is: ${HANGUPCAUSE})

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

2011-04-15 Thread Vlasis Hatzistavrou
Hello Steve, On 15/4/2011 5:07 μμ, Steve Davies wrote: Strictly speaking you can only Hangup (BYE) an answered and fully established call. In SIP terms, a hangup that occurs before an answer is a CANCEL, and I believe a CANCEL is always represented by a 503 code in chan_sip. Regards, Steve I

Re: [asterisk-users] If voice mail not found dialplan

2011-04-15 Thread satish patel
Perfect! Thanks Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:21:48 -0400 From: supp...@drdos.info To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] If voice mail not found dialplan Satish Patel wrote: want it say person doest have vm setup yet. smthing like that. How should I handle

[asterisk-users] sangoma card rx/tx gain level

2011-04-15 Thread satish patel
Hey Guys! We had echo issue before so we replaced old PRI card with Sangoma A102D HWEC. Now my question is i set rx/txgain level 0.0 default do i need to touch this value or default is best. I have read on google and people say it should around 14844 on ztmonitor for rx/tx level same. I

[asterisk-users] Hot to make call parking to Mult tenant

2011-04-15 Thread virendra bhati
Hi, I am working on call packing feature of asterisk. Call packing is working fine but I want to make this feature as multi tenant. exp:- *for A client* packing extension are parkext = 700 parkpos = 701-720 context = parkedcalls_A parkingtime = 45 *for B client *packing extension are

[asterisk-users] Reach PSTN from another Asterisk

2011-04-15 Thread Alejandro Cabrera Obed
Dear, we have the following: - Asterisk A with E1 to PSTN connection. - Asterisk B with IAX trunk to Asterisk A - Outgoing routes between Asterisk A and B - Asterisk A with an outgoing route to PSTN with 9|. dial rule How can I reach the PSTN from Asterisk B through Asterisk A ??? Thanks a lot

Re: [asterisk-users] accessing currents calls from outside asterisk

2011-04-15 Thread Pezhman Lali
yes, ami is your unique answer. what is msisdns ? On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Albert alber...@wp.pl wrote: Hi, I am working on integration of 2 systems: asterisk and messaging platform. What I need is to access somehow information about current calls. Should I do it over AMI ? I

Re: [asterisk-users] Reach PSTN from another Asterisk

2011-04-15 Thread Jim Dickenson
On server B use IAX2/iax-trunk-name/whatever-needs-to-be-dialed-on-A-to-make-call in the Dial command. like Dial(IAX2/sfserver1/9411212) -- Jim Dickenson mailto:dicken...@cfmc.com CfMC http://www.cfmc.com/ On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote: Dear, we have the

Re: [asterisk-users] Good by asterisk 1.4? Please not.

2011-04-15 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
1.4 svn has a nasty bug in it at the moment. Would love to see that fixed ;) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18951 Julian On 15 April 2011 14:22, Satish Patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote: You know we don't have choise. I had remembered when we shifted 1.2 to first release of 1.4 and

[asterisk-users] 1.8.4-rc2: ReceiveFAX fails

2011-04-15 Thread sean darcy
On a test fax: -- Executing [s@incoming-fax:1] Set(DAHDI/4-1, FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20110415_1825) in new stack -- Executing [s@incoming-fax:2] Answer(DAHDI/4-1, ) in new stack -- Executing [s@incoming-fax:3] ReceiveFAX(DAHDI/4-1,

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.8.4-rc2: ReceiveFAX fails

2011-04-15 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 07:00:27PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: ... Do the log notes of the CED tone or the T.30 ECM warning have anything to do with this? I can't help with this. faxbuffers=6,full ; who knows what this does But I do know that this faxbuffers policy basically is telling the

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.8.4-rc2: ReceiveFAX fails

2011-04-15 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:00 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: Using spandsp-0.0.6-pre18, the Jan 22 release. You might try using spandsp-0.0.6-pre17. That version works great for me with 1.8.4-rc2. When I tried pre18 it failed to receive any faxes. Ryan --

Re: [asterisk-users] sangoma card rx/tx gain level

2011-04-15 Thread cb
On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:50 PM, satish patel wrote: We had echo issue before so we replaced old PRI card with Sangoma A102D HWEC. Now my question is i set rx/txgain level 0.0 default do i need to touch this value or default is best. I have read on google and people say it should around 14844

[asterisk-users] Duplicate cdr records with channel local

2011-04-15 Thread Adolphe Cher-Aime
Hi list, I use AMI to originate calls for outbound campaigns via local channel. I use CDR records to have status of the calls such as : disposition, if call was answered by live human or answering machine, reason of call failure and make accounting based on total calls that have