Re: [asterisk-users] custom automated meeting

2011-11-02 Thread Thanasis
on 11/02/2011 07:44 AM Sammy Govind wrote the following: core show application meetme Thanks! (I am new to asterisk, and just learning, so forgive my dumb questions) -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] FFA - Asterisk 1.6.2.6

2011-11-02 Thread Olivier
2011/11/2 Christian Tardif christian.tar...@servinfo.ca Hi, I have a 1.6.2.6 fax installation with a FFA license which seems to be installed correctly (in fax show stats, I see that I have 1 Digium G.711 licensed channel, and 1 Digium T.38 licensed channel). When trying to call my

Re: [asterisk-users] FFA - Asterisk 1.6.2.6

2011-11-02 Thread Anton Kvashenkin
Turn off faxdetect on this peer. 2011/11/2 Christian Tardif christian.tar...@servinfo.ca Hi, I have a 1.6.2.6 fax installation with a FFA license which seems to be installed correctly (in fax show stats, I see that I have 1 Digium G.711 licensed channel, and 1 Digium T.38 licensed

Re: [asterisk-users] Nat Phone in Asterisk 10

2011-11-02 Thread Anton Kvashenkin
Which phone model do you use? 192.168.33.90 doesn't belong to 192.168.23.0/24, so the first thing that i will be doing is check routing tables on the phone. Or for more help you could draw you network layout and poste here. -- _

[asterisk-users] Option 'd' of application Dial not working in 1.8.8-rc2

2011-11-02 Thread Karsten Wemheuer
Hi, in asterisk 1.8.7.0 option 'd' works as expected: Pressing a key while in ringing state puts the call to an one digit extension. In asterisk 1.8.8-rc2 this is not working anymore. After doing a diff on the code it seems to me, that in version 1.8.7 there is an autoanswer in application dial

Re: [asterisk-users] Nat Phone in Asterisk 10

2011-11-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
I use Polycom 501 phones. I have two networks - 192.168.23.0/24 and 192.168.33.0/24. My Asterisk server and most of my phones are on the 23 net. I have the one phone on the 33 net for cross-net testing (works fine on 1.4.41). From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com

[asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread Philippe Sultan
Hi, I'm running an Asterisk server connected to a carrier over 2 E1 cards. From time to time, the Called Number Party presented by the carrier changes a bit (for some reason I don't know) and is prefixed with a byte string (e.g. : 00 34 34 39 ), which furtherly prevents libpri from getting the

Re: [asterisk-users] FFA - Asterisk 1.6.2.6

2011-11-02 Thread Christian Tardif
On 02/11/2011 05:04, Anton Kvashenkin wrote: Turn off faxdetect on this peer. 2011/11/2 Christian Tardif christian.tar...@servinfo.ca mailto:christian.tar...@servinfo.ca Hi, I have a 1.6.2.6 fax installation with a FFA license which seems to be installed correctly (in fax show

Re: [asterisk-users] Option 'd' of application Dial not working in 1.8.8-rc2

2011-11-02 Thread Richard Mudgett
Hi, in asterisk 1.8.7.0 option 'd' works as expected: Pressing a key while in ringing state puts the call to an one digit extension. In asterisk 1.8.8-rc2 this is not working anymore. After doing a diff on the code it seems to me, that in version 1.8.7 there is an autoanswer in

Re: [asterisk-users] Option 'd' of application Dial not working in 1.8.8-rc2

2011-11-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
Will this affect 10.X or is it just a 1.8 path? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Richard Mudgett Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 9:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

[asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello list, can anyone tell me what the following means (found in messages log) : /[Nov 2 11:16:21] ERROR[18407] rtp.c: No RTP ports remaining. Can't setup media stream for this call. [Nov 2 11:16:21] WARNING[18407] chan_sip.c: Unable to create RTP audio session: Address already in use

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
You have set an insufficient range in rtp.conf. Asterisk uses 2 ports per call, but allocates 4 for transferring, etc, so when you set up a range of 10001-10040 (for example) you are basically setting a range of 10 concurrent calls. Check rtp.conf and make the end range larger by 8 or 12 or

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello, thank you for your answer... Current range (rtp.conf) : 11500 - 11650 Current calls : 20 à 25 Is this not sufficient ?? Jonas. On 11/02/2011 04:00 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: You have set an insufficient range in rtp.conf. Asterisk uses 2 ports per call, but allocates 4 for

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Ruben Rögels
Number of wished concurrent calls times 4 = Number of ports you'll need to setup in rtp.conf ;-) regards, Ruben Am 02.11.2011 16:05, schrieb Jonas Kellens: Hello, thank you for your answer... Current range (rtp.conf) : 11500 - 11650 Current calls : 20 à 25 Is this not sufficient ??

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
150/4 = 37.5. maybe your sip peer has a conflicting range? From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:06 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject:

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Jonas Kellens
On 11/02/2011 04:13 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: 150/4 = 37.5. maybe your sip peer has a conflicting range? Where do I set this range in my peer definition ? I don't think there is such a parameter in sip.conf To be perfectly clear, how many RTP-ports are needed in the below situation :

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build sip pvt data - Switching equipment congestion

2011-11-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
As I understand it, the scenario you describe would only use 2 channels (I don’t think the RTP channel gets established until connection; I could be wrong about this as Asterisk might pre-reserve the channels for early media, etc.) – do keep in mind however that although you mention 2 and 2 (1

Re: [asterisk-users] Option 'd' of application Dial not working in 1.8.8-rc2

2011-11-02 Thread Richard Mudgett
Hi, in asterisk 1.8.7.0 option 'd' works as expected: Pressing a key while in ringing state puts the call to an one digit extension. In asterisk 1.8.8-rc2 this is not working anymore. After doing a diff on the code it seems to me, that in version 1.8.7 there is an autoanswer in

Re: [asterisk-users] Option 'd' of application Dial not working in 1.8.8-rc2

2011-11-02 Thread Karsten Wemheuer
Hi Richard, Am Mittwoch, den 02.11.2011, 09:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Mudgett: Hi, in asterisk 1.8.7.0 option 'd' works as expected: Pressing a key while in ringing state puts the call to an one digit extension. In asterisk 1.8.8-rc2 this is not working anymore. After doing a diff

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread giovanni.v
Il 02/11/2011 15.06, Philippe Sultan ha scritto: PRI Span: 1 [70 13 a1 00 34 34 39 39 30 30 32 30 33 36 31 35 38 39 34 32 35] Yes, like you guessed the third bit (wich is part of the called number i.e.) is a NUL... but Q.931 allows any IA5 (ISO 646) character so it's a bug in libpri not in

Re: [asterisk-users] FFA - Asterisk 1.6.2.6

2011-11-02 Thread Warren Selby
Sorry for the top post. A valid fax extension is an extension named 'fax' in the incoming context for that peer. I.e: exten = fax,1,Verbose(1,Incoming fax call detected) exten = fax,n,ReceiveFax() You would obviously have a much longer definition, this was just a quick example from my phone.

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread Philippe Sultan
Giovanni, Thanks a lot for clearing this up. The 's' extension would match any number, and I would not be able to retrieve the actually dialed number from within the dialplan, unless I'm missing something. I'll file a ticket to solve that issue. Thanks again, Philippe On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at

[asterisk-users] Change indications in Dialplan

2011-11-02 Thread Elliot Murdock
Hello, What is the method for changing the country for indications (eg. ring, busy, etc. tones) in a dialplan? Thanks, Elliot -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread Olivier
2011/11/2 giovanni.v i...@keybits.org snip so it's a bug in libpri not in your telco side. PRI Span: 1 [70 13 a1 00 34 34 39 39 30 30 32 30 33 36 31 35 38 39 34 32 35] 1. As the above line comes from libpri, how can one be certain the telco side didn't send the weird NUL byte ? (I don't

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread giovanni.v
On 02/11/2011 17.52, Philippe Sultan wrote: The 's' extension would match any number, and I would not be able to retrieve the actually dialed number from within the dialplan, unless I'm missing something. No, obviously you missed none... but I prefer to route an incoming call to a generic

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread giovanni.v
On 02/11/2011 18.45, Olivier wroteo: 1. As the above line comes from libpri, how can one be certain the telco side didn't send the weird NUL byte ? Assuming libpri debug doesn't mess nothing is quite sure the NUL come in from the telco. 2. Anyway, as Q.931 allows any IA5 (ISO 646)

Re: [asterisk-users] libpri : Q.931 Called Party Number interpreted as empty

2011-11-02 Thread Philippe Sultan
Issue filed : https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/PRI-128 Philippe On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:00 PM, giovanni.v i...@keybits.org wrote: On 02/11/2011 17.52, Philippe Sultan wrote: The 's' extension would match any number, and I would not be able to retrieve the actually dialed number