[asterisk-users] Queue-Tip/Adhearsion installation tip
Hi, I'm giving Queue-Tip a try, following installation instructions in http://queue-tip.rubyforge.org/install.html. My setup is : ruby 1.8.7 rubygems 1.3.7 rails 3.1.3 Adhearsion 1.2.3 I'm struck in step 7 in the above installation procedure : # rake --trace db:create (in /usr/local/src/queue-tip) rake aborted! no such file to load -- initializer /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:54:in `load_initializer' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:38:in `run' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:11:in `boot!' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:109 /usr/local/src/queue-tip/Rakefile:4:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/Rakefile:4 /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2383:in `load' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2383:in `raw_load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2017:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2016:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2000:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:1998:in `run' /usr/bin/rake:28 I'm completely new to ruby, rails and so on. Suggestions ? Regards -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Queue-Tip/Adhearsion installation tip
On 11-11-28 03:47 AM, Olivier wrote: Hi, I'm giving Queue-Tip a try, following installation instructions in http://queue-tip.rubyforge.org/install.html. My setup is : ruby 1.8.7 rubygems 1.3.7 rails 3.1.3 Adhearsion 1.2.3 I'm struck in step 7 in the above installation procedure : # rake --trace db:create (in /usr/local/src/queue-tip) rake aborted! no such file to load -- initializer /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:54:in `load_initializer' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:38:in `run' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:11:in `boot!' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/config/boot.rb:109 /usr/local/src/queue-tip/Rakefile:4:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/Rakefile:4 /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2383:in `load' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2383:in `raw_load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2017:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2016:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2000:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:1998:in `run' /usr/bin/rake:28 I'm completely new to ruby, rails and so on. Suggestions ? Contact the maintainer for support? Since this is not an asterisk issue. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Queue-Tip/Adhearsion installation tip
2011/11/28 Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.com On 11-11-28 03:47 AM, Olivier wrote: Hi, I'm giving Queue-Tip a try, following installation instructions in http://queue-tip.rubyforge.**org/install.htmlhttp://queue-tip.rubyforge.org/install.html . My setup is : ruby 1.8.7 rubygems 1.3.7 rails 3.1.3 Adhearsion 1.2.3 I'm struck in step 7 in the above installation procedure : # rake --trace db:create (in /usr/local/src/queue-tip) rake aborted! no such file to load -- initializer /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/**custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/**custom_require.rb:31:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:54:in `load_initializer' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:38:in `run' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:11:in `boot!' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:109 /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**Rakefile:4:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**Rakefile:4 /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2383:in `load' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2383:in `raw_load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2017:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2016:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2000:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**1998:in `run' /usr/bin/rake:28 I'm completely new to ruby, rails and so on. Suggestions ? Contact the maintainer for support? Since this is not an asterisk issue. Yes, you're right (though I hoped I could get interesting answers here). -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- __**__**_ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] AsteriskGUI - Which version for 1.8 ?
Hi, I'm looking at AsteriskGUI repository in http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk-gui/tags/ . What are the differences between versions 2.0.5-rc6, 2.0.6-rc2 and 2.1.0-rc1, (as I can't find any CHANGELOG file explaining this) ? Which version is recommended for 1.8 or 10 ? Regards -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] hwo to stok variable wiith menu
hello Noll
thank you for your help
i would to ask you please, i want to store the phone number of the
customer in the option_name column when he press 3 in context menu
i have created a database aheevacss with user aheevaccs and password
aheevaccs and also i have creatd a table in this database name of table
test with two columns:
option_namevarchar(15)
countint
1-how can i check if the app_mysql module compiled and loaded i use
asterisk 1.4 and if not installed how can ido in order to install and
loaded it
2- can you please veify the menu below and tell me waht is wrong
thanks and regards
[default]
exten = 529,1,Ringing()
exten = 529,2,Wait(4)
exten = 529,3,Goto(accueil,s,1)
[accueil] ; définition d’un contexte pour l’accueil
exten = s,1,SetGlobalVar(sounds_path=/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/)
exten = s,2,Background(${sounds_path}welcome)
exten = s,3,goto(accueil,s,1)
exten = #,1,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = i,1,Playback(${sounds_path}erreur-saisie)
exten = i,2,goto(accueil,s,1)
exten = t,1,Goto(accueil,s,1)
[menu]
exten = s,1,Background(${sounds_path}menu)
exten = 0,1,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = 1,1,Goto(appel,s,1)
exten = 2,1,Goto(message,s,1)
exten = 3,1,NoOp(User chose support option)
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Connect connid localhost aheevaccs aheevaccs aheevaccs)
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Query resultid ${connid} update test set count = count
+ 1 where option_name = 'support')
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Clear ${resultid})
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Disconnect ${connid})
exten = 3,n,Goto(support,s,1)
exten = s,2,goto(menu,s,1)
exten = i,1,Playback(${sounds_path}erreur-saisie)
exten = i,2,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = t,1,Goto(menu,s,1)
[appel] ; définition d’un contexte pour le menu d’appel
exten = s,1,Background(${sounds_path}appel)
exten = s,2,WaitExten(10)
exten = 0,1,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = 223,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},20,tr)
exten = i,1,Playback(${sounds_path}erreur-saisie)
exten = i,2,Goto(appel,s,1)
exten = t,1,Goto(appel,s,1)
[message] ; définition d’un contexte pour la messagerie
exten = s,1,VoiceMailMain(${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = t,1,Hangup()
[support] ; définition d’un contexte pour le support
exten = s,1,GoToIfTime(09:00-17:00|mon-fri|*|*?s,4)
exten = s,2,Playback(${sounds_path}no-relation-support)
exten = s,3,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = s,4,Playback(${sounds_path}relation-support)
exten = s,5,Queue(default)
exten = t,1,Hangup()
2011/11/25 Dale Noll dn...@wi.rr.com
**
On 11/25/2011 10:48 AM, salaheddine elharit wrote:
thanks for your response
i use mysql like a database and my question when the customer press 3 in
context menu i want to stok this variable in a table in my database and i
want to get this variable after
could you please give an exemple like below
thanks and regards
[menu]
exten = s,1,Background(${sounds_path}menu)
exten = 0,1,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = 1,1,Goto(appel,s,1)
exten = 2,1,Goto(message,s,1)
exten = 3,1,Goto(support,s,1)
exten = s,2,goto(menu,s,1)
exten = i,1,Playback(${sounds_path}erreur-saisie)
exten = i,2,Goto(menu,s,1)
exten = t,1,Goto(menu,s,1)
It is difficult to get a good example because I do not know what you are
looking to save. You say you want to store the variable, but the only
variable you have in this case is the digit the user entered, in this case
'3'. If you are trying to count the number of times callers press option
'3', then it is a simple update.
If you have the app_mysql module compiled and loaded you can user the
MYSQL() app.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+MYSQL
If you do not want would prefer to setup an ODBC connection, that is a bid
more complex as you have to setup unixODBC ( /etc/odbcinst.ini,
/etc/odbc.ini ), then setup res_odbc(/etc/asterisk/res_odbc.conf) and
func_odbc (/etc/asterisk/func_odbc.conf).
How you update the database from within dialplan depends on which access
method you choose.
Assume you have a mysql table with two columns:
option_namevarchar(15)
countint
You could write something like this if you are using app_mysql
exten = 3,1,NoOp(User chose support option)
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Connect connid localhost database_user
database_password database_name)
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Query resultid ${connid} update counter_table set
count = count + 1 where option_name = 'support')
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Clear ${resultid})
exten = 3,n,MYSQL(Disconnect ${connid})
exten = 3,n,Goto(support,s,1)
--
The truth speaks for itself. I'm just the messenger.
Lyta Alexander - Babylon 5
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
Re: [asterisk-users] Call Parking
Have you tried ParkAndAnnounce instead of Park?
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Richard Zulu
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 1:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Call Parking
Hey,
I am configuring call parking on asterisk however I have the following
issue,
- Caller A calls caller B
- Caller B receives the call and transfers it to the parking extension 799,
so that caller C can receive the call
-*The extension to which the call has been parked is read out to caller A
(who did not park the call) instead of caller B (who parked the call) : this
is the problem.
How can I solve that? I have tried all the options of T, t and r however in
vain.
Here is my config in extensions.conf for call parking
;Parking calls for office A
exten = 799,1,Set(CHANNEL(parkinglot)=parkinglot_main)
exten = 799,n,Set(_PARKINGLOT=parkinglot_main)
exten = 799,n,Answer()
exten = 799,n,Park()
exten = 799,n,Hangup()
[macro-officeA]
exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG1},10,Ttr)
exten = s,n,GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = BUSY]?busy:unavail)
exten = s,n(unavail),Voicemail(${MACRO_EXTEN}@officea-vmail,u)
exten = s,n,Hangup()
exten = s,n(busy),VoiceMail(${MACRO_EXTEN}@officea-vmail,b)
exten = s,n,Hangup()
exten = 1234,1,MeetMe(1234,i)
Features.conf has this:
[parkinglot_main]
context = officeA
parkext = 799
parkpos = 800-850
findslot = next
Thanks
Richard Zulu
Twitter
www.twitter.com/richardzulu
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardzulu
Skype: zulu.richard
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Call Parking Realtime
Does anyone have any examples of using realtime database driven call parking lots. I am on version 1.8.x My goal is to be able to do database driven multi-tenant parking lots with out adding sperate entries into Features.conf for each lot. I also need to be able to use the same parking extension pool for each tenant but sand box them into sperate lots. We have been able to do this for every other feature on Asterisk except parking lots. What am I missing? Thanks Bryant -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Call Parking
Are you parking using blind transfer? if so, you will need to use an
attended transfer. once the parking lots is read you may complete the
transfer to the parking lot.
On 11-11-28 10:15 AM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
Have you tried ParkAndAnnounce instead of Park?
*From:*asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of
*Richard Zulu
*Sent:* Friday, November 25, 2011 1:57 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Call Parking
Hey,
I am configuring call parking on asterisk however I have the following
issue,
- Caller A calls caller B
- Caller B receives the call and transfers it to the parking extension
799, so that caller C can receive the call
-*The extension to which the call has been parked is read out to
caller A (who did not park the call) instead of caller B (who parked
the call) : *this is the problem.*
How can I solve that? I have tried all the options of T, t and r
however in vain.
*Here is my config in extensions.conf for call parking*
;Parking calls for office A
exten = 799,1,Set(CHANNEL(parkinglot)=parkinglot_main)
exten = 799,n,Set(_PARKINGLOT=parkinglot_main)
exten = 799,n,Answer()
exten = 799,n,Park()
exten = 799,n,Hangup()
[macro-officeA]
exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG1},10,Ttr)
exten = s,n,GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = BUSY]?busy:unavail)
exten = s,n(unavail),Voicemail(${MACRO_EXTEN}@officea-vmail,u)
exten = s,n,Hangup()
exten = s,n(busy),VoiceMail(${MACRO_EXTEN}@officea-vmail,b)
exten = s,n,Hangup()
exten = 1234,1,MeetMe(1234,i)
*Features.conf has this:*
[parkinglot_main]
context = officeA
parkext = 799
parkpos = 800-850
findslot = next
Thanks
Richard Zulu
Twitter
www.twitter.com/richardzulu http://www.twitter.com/richardzulu
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardzulu
Skype: zulu.richard
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Kind regards,
Keith Sloan
Vianet Internet Solutions
Voice Operations Center
OFFICE - (800) 788 0363 ext 7203
Local - (705) 222 9996 ext 7203
Email - kei...@vianet.ca
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Call Parking Realtime
I think I may have found a partial answer to my own question but I have not come up with any examples. Anyone have any examples for PARKINGLOT PARKINGDYNAMIC PARKINGDYNCONTEXT PARKINGDYNPOS Thanks Bryant From: Bryant Zimmerman brya...@zktech.com Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 10:30 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Call Parking Realtime Does anyone have any examples of using realtime database driven call parking lots. I am on version 1.8.x My goal is to be able to do database driven multi-tenant parking lots with out adding sperate entries into Features.conf for each lot. I also need to be able to use the same parking extension pool for each tenant but sand box them into sperate lots. We have been able to do this for every other feature on Asterisk except parking lots. What am I missing? Thanks Bryant -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] A new hack?
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote: Linux has excellent built-in subsystems to control firewalling and so on without resorting to external programs. It's called iptables. If you know how to use them, then using an external resource such as fail2ban is unneccessary. That's like saying you don't need FreePBX because you have this thing called Asterisk. Though I've never used Fail2Ban, it is an excellent example of middleware that looks at application level events and feeds updates to iptables. So the important blocking is happening in kernel mode, not userland. Your example: For example, with iptables rules you can say something like: If a connection from a remote site to a local port happens more than (say) once a second then drop that connection. doesn't always work well for some applications. Ever look at WebDAV traffic? Code me an iptables rule that figures out someone is doing bad things via WebDAV :-) -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Does Asterisk alter the Headers of INVITE Message
thank you for ur solution, I did this in dail plan yesterday ... it took me 5
hours to find that solution , I wish u replied to me earlier but thanx :)
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Torbjörn Abrahamsson
[torbjorn.abrahams...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 12:43 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Does Asterisk alter the Headers of
INVITE Message
Well, It doesn't forward the INVITE at all, as asterisk is NOT a proxy. It
creates a totally new INVITE when you issue the Dial application, with its
own set of headers.
Now, you can pass the Test header with something like this (taken from
memory...):
SipAddHeader(Test: ${SIP_HEADER(Test)})
Do that prior to the call to the Dial application, and you will see your
header in the outgoing INVITE. Of course this means that your dial plan need
to know which headers to pass.
// T
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Faraj Khasib
Sent: den 28 november 2011 00:42
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Does Asterisk alter the Headers of INVITE
Message
Any body knows how I can configure Asterisk SIP to pass all Header
Parameters?
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Faraj Khasib
[fkha...@iconnecths.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:50 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Does Asterisk alter the Headers of
INVITE Message
thats my main question if u can see Does Asterisk alter the Headersof
INVITE Message
I am using ASterisk NOW proxy I didnt configure it to delete anything ,
Can u tell me how I can change it to pass that parameters?
thanx
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
[abalas...@evaristesys.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:41 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Does Asterisk alter the Headers of
INVITE Message
On 11/27/2011 05:25 PM, Faraj Khasib wrote:
Yes, see attached ... Proxy server alter my Test custom header and
delete it, Is there a way to include it in message sent from SIP
Proxy to target?
That would be a proxy configuration issue, wouldn't it?
In principle, the proxy should be passing these messages through
unmodified, unless you have an explicit configuration directive that
instructs it to remove headers from the INVITE.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Call Parking
You need to use the kK option for the dial command. See
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+Dial
Jimmy
-Original Message-
From: da...@debsinc.com
Sent: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:15:58 -0600
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Call Parking
Have you tried ParkAndAnnounce instead of Park?
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Zulu
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 1:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Call Parking
Hey,
I am configuring call parking on asterisk however I have the following
issue,
- Caller A calls caller B
- Caller B receives the call and transfers it to the parking extension
799,
so that caller C can receive the call
-*The extension to which the call has been parked is read out to caller A
(who did not park the call) instead of caller B (who parked the call) :
this
is the problem.
How can I solve that? I have tried all the options of T, t and r however
in
vain.
Here is my config in extensions.conf for call parking
;Parking calls for office A
exten = 799,1,Set(CHANNEL(parkinglot)=parkinglot_main)
exten = 799,n,Set(_PARKINGLOT=parkinglot_main)
exten = 799,n,Answer()
exten = 799,n,Park()
exten = 799,n,Hangup()
[macro-officeA]
exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG1},10,Ttr)
exten = s,n,GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = BUSY]?busy:unavail)
exten = s,n(unavail),Voicemail(${MACRO_EXTEN}@officea-vmail,u)
exten = s,n,Hangup()
exten = s,n(busy),VoiceMail(${MACRO_EXTEN}@officea-vmail,b)
exten = s,n,Hangup()
exten = 1234,1,MeetMe(1234,i)
Features.conf has this:
[parkinglot_main]
context = officeA
parkext = 799
parkpos = 800-850
findslot = next
Thanks
Richard Zulu
Twitter
www.twitter.com/richardzulu
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardzulu
Skype: zulu.richard
Send your photos by email in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if3
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] How to use password file with AuthenticateApplication
On 11/24/11 2:13 AM, virendra bhati wrote: I did the same as you mention like that *echo -n 1234 | md5sum another things to check are: - the permission of the file /tmp/pass.txt? - the user/group of that file? - the user/group asterisk running as? i'm using 1.6.2.18 and it works perfectly. maybe you can upgrade yours -- Edwin Lam edwin@officegeneral.com Systems Engineer, OfficeWyze, Inc. Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fax: +1 415 283 3370 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD6506D20 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a feature that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren't doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some joy. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a feature that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren't doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some joy. *From:*asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really annoying as I don't want my user to have to enter 2 or more times). This behavior was resolved in 10.0. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of john Millican Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a feature that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren't doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some joy. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since the version I am using 1.4.8? You are actually recommending an older version than I am using? In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine? I usually build from source but I am thinking about just installing CentOS 5.3 and installing it from YUM but I will have to see what version that installs. Any good or bad things to say about using AsteriskNow? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really annoying as I don’t want my user to have to enter 2 or more times). This behavior was resolved in 10.0. ** ** *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *john Millican *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations ** ** On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a “feature” that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren’t doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some “joy”. *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [ mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.comasterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. ** ** Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
1.4.42 is newer than 1.4.8. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 4:49 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since the version I am using 1.4.8? You are actually recommending an older version than I am using? In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine? I usually build from source but I am thinking about just installing CentOS 5.3 and installing it from YUM but I will have to see what version that installs. Any good or bad things to say about using AsteriskNow? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really annoying as I don't want my user to have to enter 2 or more times). This behavior was resolved in 10.0. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of john Millican Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a feature that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren't doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some joy. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
Danny, Thanks for your help. OK, guess I got confused by the fact that 8 comes after 4. Maybe I missed something in the version number or maybe I am just, well, lacking sleep. When did the version numbers start going backwards? By the way, I hope I am not top posting but Gmail is a little whacky, trying to get use to it. --Todd On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: 1.4.42 is newer than 1.4.8. ** ** *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 4:49 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations ** ** Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since the version I am using 1.4.8? You are actually recommending an older version than I am using? ** ** In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine? ** ** I usually build from source but I am thinking about just installing CentOS 5.3 and installing it from YUM but I will have to see what version that installs. ** ** Any good or bad things to say about using AsteriskNow? ** ** ** ** ** ** On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really annoying as I don’t want my user to have to enter 2 or more times). This behavior was resolved in 10.0. *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *john Millican *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a “feature” that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren’t doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some “joy”. *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [ mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.comasterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ** ** -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Todd Routhier wrote: In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine? When you 'sudo yum -y upgrade' you will discover that you are then magically running 5.7. -- Thanks in advance, - Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Queue-Tip/Adhearsion installation tip
Some links which might be of interest for you: beginrescueend.com -- do go through this before installing ruby. github.com/adhearsion/adhearsion/wiki/Getting-Started On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Olivier oza_4...@yahoo.fr wrote: 2011/11/28 Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.com On 11-11-28 03:47 AM, Olivier wrote: Hi, I'm giving Queue-Tip a try, following installation instructions in http://queue-tip.rubyforge.**org/install.htmlhttp://queue-tip.rubyforge.org/install.html . My setup is : ruby 1.8.7 rubygems 1.3.7 rails 3.1.3 Adhearsion 1.2.3 I'm struck in step 7 in the above installation procedure : # rake --trace db:create (in /usr/local/src/queue-tip) rake aborted! no such file to load -- initializer /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/**custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/**custom_require.rb:31:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:54:in `load_initializer' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:38:in `run' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:11:in `boot!' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**config/boot.rb:109 /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**Rakefile:4:in `require' /usr/local/src/queue-tip/**Rakefile:4 /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2383:in `load' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2383:in `raw_load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2017:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2016:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2000:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rake.rb:**1998:in `run' /usr/bin/rake:28 I'm completely new to ruby, rails and so on. Suggestions ? Contact the maintainer for support? Since this is not an asterisk issue. Yes, you're right (though I hoped I could get interesting answers here). -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- __**__**_ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Thanks Regards Gokulnath @8129845320 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
8 comes before 42. - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 . From: Todd Routhier [mailto:fonema...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:55 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations Danny, Thanks for your help. OK, guess I got confused by the fact that 8 comes after 4. Maybe I missed something in the version number or maybe I am just, well, lacking sleep. When did the version numbers start going backwards? By the way, I hope I am not top posting but Gmail is a little whacky, trying to get use to it. --Todd On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.commailto:da...@debsinc.com wrote: 1.4.42 is newer than 1.4.8. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 4:49 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since the version I am using 1.4.8? You are actually recommending an older version than I am using? In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine? I usually build from source but I am thinking about just installing CentOS 5.3 and installing it from YUM but I will have to see what version that installs. Any good or bad things to say about using AsteriskNow? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.commailto:da...@debsinc.com wrote: App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really annoying as I don't want my user to have to enter 2 or more times). This behavior was resolved in 10.0. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of john Millican Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a feature that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren't doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some joy. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.commailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
Re: [asterisk-users] How to use password file with AuthenticateApplication
Hi Edwin, - the permission of the file /tmp/pass.txt? - the user/group of that file? - the user/group asterisk running as? I have 777 permission for that file. [root@haddock8-astrx tmp]# ll -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 81 Nov 24 15:39 pass.txt Asterisk version is *Asterisk 1.6.2.11* and asterisk running with root user. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Edwin Lam edwin@officegeneral.comwrote: On 11/24/11 2:13 AM, virendra bhati wrote: I did the same as you mention like that *echo -n 1234 | md5sum another things to check are: - the permission of the file /tmp/pass.txt? - the user/group of that file? - the user/group asterisk running as? i'm using 1.6.2.18 and it works perfectly. maybe you can upgrade yours -- Edwin Lam edwin@officegeneral.com Systems Engineer, OfficeWyze, Inc. Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fax: +1 415 283 3370 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/**pks/lookup?op=getsearch=**0xD6506D20http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD6506D20 -- __**__**_ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Thanks and regards Virendra Bhati +91-8885268942 Software Engineer -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
OK, so yeah.. Lack of sleep. I think my brain just kept seeing 4.2 instead of 42. Thanks for the clarification. Man do I feel like a bozo now. --Todd On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Douglas Mortensen d...@impalanetworks.com wrote: 8 comes before 42. ** ** - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 . ** ** *From:* Todd Routhier [mailto:fonema...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 3:55 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations ** ** Danny, ** ** Thanks for your help. ** ** OK, guess I got confused by the fact that 8 comes after 4. ** ** Maybe I missed something in the version number or maybe I am just, well, lacking sleep. ** ** When did the version numbers start going backwards? ** ** By the way, I hope I am not top posting but Gmail is a little whacky, trying to get use to it. ** ** --Todd ** ** On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: 1.4.42 is newer than 1.4.8. *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 4:49 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since the version I am using 1.4.8? You are actually recommending an older version than I am using? In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine? I usually build from source but I am thinking about just installing CentOS 5.3 and installing it from YUM but I will have to see what version that installs. Any good or bad things to say about using AsteriskNow? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really annoying as I don’t want my user to have to enter 2 or more times). This behavior was resolved in 10.0. *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *john Millican *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a “feature” that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren’t doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some “joy”. *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [ mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.comasterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it has served me well. Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of Asterisk. My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the best version in terms of queue features, functionality. Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on. To be clear: Recommended: Asterisk Version: OS Version: I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be another plus. Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics. Danny, Can you expand on what feature 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so am rather curious. Thanks, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth
