Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Edwards

On Sun, 6 May 2012, Nunya Biznatch wrote:

Thanks for the info. It got me digging deeper. I definitely don't want 
to screw this one up, but I've got to pinch pennies to get this done, so 
don't want to buy anything that would just be nice to have. ...but if I 
have to get it, that's what I'll do.


Aside from capacity, think about maintenance.

If you 'front' your Asterisk servers with Kamailio running on 2 servers 
(even if these servers are also your Asterisk servers) you have the 
ability to take an Asterisk server out of production just by reconfiguring 
Kamailio and waiting the calls in progress to finish.


Then you can install patches, replace failing disks, etc, etc, etc.

--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve Edwards   sedwa...@sedwards.com  Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline  Fax: +1-760-731-3000

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Mysql identifier not found

2012-05-07 Thread Jonas Kellens

Hello;

is it normal that connid and resutid have values of 73 and 74 ??

How come this value increases ? What does this mean for values 1 to 70 ??


[May  7 08:52:41] -- Executing [h@sub:10] NoOp(SIP/kal3-024f, 
) in new stack
[May  7 08:52:41] -- Executing [h@sub:11] NoOp(SIP/kal3-024f, 
clear MySQL-connections) in new stack
[May  7 08:52:41] -- Executing [h@sub:12] MYSQL(SIP/kal3-024f, 
Clear 74) in new stack
[May  7 08:52:41] WARNING[15003]: app_mysql.c:194 find_identifier: 
Identifier 74, identifier_type 2 not found in identifier list
[May  7 08:52:41] WARNING[15003]: app_mysql.c:510 aMYSQL_clear: Invalid 
result identifier 74 passed in aMYSQL_clear
[May  7 08:52:41] -- Executing [h@sub:13] MYSQL(SIP/kal3-024f, 
Disconnect 73) in new stack
[May  7 08:52:41] WARNING[15003]: app_mysql.c:194 find_identifier: 
Identifier 73, identifier_type 1 not found in identifier list
[May  7 08:52:41] WARNING[15003]: app_mysql.c:527 aMYSQL_disconnect: 
Invalid connection identifier 73 passed in aMYSQL_disconnect
[May  7 08:52:41] -- Executing [h@sub:14] NoOp(SIP/kal3-024f, 
clear MySQL-connections) in new stack
[May  7 08:52:41] -- Executing [h@sub:15] NoOp(SIP/kal3-024f, 
end) in new stack



There are currently only 8 calls going on...



Kind regards,
Jonas.


 Original Message 
Subject:Re: [asterisk-users] Mysql identifier not found
Date:   Sat, 05 May 2012 12:06:38 +0200
From:   Jonas Kellens jonas.kell...@telenet.be
To: 	Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com




I ask this because I find the MySQL status information a bit alarming 
(2946 connections) :



mysql status
--
mysql  Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.95, for redhat-linux-gnu (x86_64) using 
readline 5.1


Connection id:2922
Current database:
Current user:root@localhost
SSL:Not in use
Current pager:stdout
Using outfile:''
Using delimiter:;
Server version:5.0.95 Source distribution
Protocol version:10
Connection:Localhost via UNIX socket
Server characterset:latin1
Db characterset:latin1
Client characterset:latin1
Conn.  characterset:latin1
UNIX socket:/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
Uptime:6 hours 54 min 31 sec

Threads: 3  Questions: 4919496  Slow queries: 0  Opens: 47  Flush 
tables: 1  Open tables: 41  Queries per second avg: 197.800

--

mysql show status like 'Conn%';
+---+---+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---+---+
| Connections   | 2946  |
+---+---+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)



Jonas.


On 05/05/2012 11:53 AM, Jonas Kellens wrote:

Hello,

notice in the console output beneath that there is a resultid 6 but it 
can not be cleared :



[May  5 11:46:27] -- Executing [s@sub:3] 
MYSQL(SIP/vart-0336, Connect connid localhost dialplan host 
Asterisk) in new stack
[May  5 11:46:27] -- Executing [s@sub:4] 
MYSQL(SIP/vart-0336, Query resultid 4 DELETE FROM pickuptbl 
WHERE pickmark LIKE %SIP/vart2-0336%) in new stack
[May  5 11:46:27] -- Executing [s@sub:5] 
MYSQL(SIP/vart-0336, Clear 6) in new stack
[May  5 11:46:27] WARNING[17803]: app_mysql.c:194 find_identifier: 
Identifier 6, identifier_type 2 not found in identifier list
[May  5 11:46:27] WARNING[17803]: app_mysql.c:510 aMYSQL_clear: 
Invalid result identifier 6 passed in aMYSQL_clear
[May  5 11:46:27] -- Executing [s@sub:6] 
MYSQL(SIP/vart-0336, Disconnect 4) in new stack
[May  5 11:46:27] -- Executing [s@sub:7] 
Return(SIP/vart-0336, ) in new stack



How come ??


Kind regards,
Jonas.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided byhttp://www.api-digital.com  --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx

All,

has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients? Does 
this work properly? What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of 
ease of use, battery life etc)?


Thx!!

B.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Mitul Limbani
Used the Snom M9 Wifi DECT phones, they work like charm.

SIPDroid on Android phones work good too, however latency is going to be
nightmare for u in softphone n wifi kinda scenario.

Use good quality Access Points like Ruckus Wireless.

Mitul
On May 7, 2012 1:55 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be wrote:

 All,

 has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients? Does
 this work properly? What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of
 ease of use, battery life etc)?

 Thx!!

 B.

 --
 __**__**_
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  
 http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx

Hi,

thx! The Snom M9 does not look like a Wifi phone however, nor is it a 
smarthpone. In order to use that I would have to use access points that 
can handle both Wifi and DECT. Astraa seems to have (an expensive) one.


SIPDroid crossed my mind. You say they work OK but the latency is 
problematic? Is the experience as a whole then not poblematic?


thx!

B.



On 05/07/12 10:29, Mitul Limbani wrote:


Used the Snom M9 Wifi DECT phones, they work like charm.

SIPDroid on Android phones work good too, however latency is going to 
be nightmare for u in softphone n wifi kinda scenario.


Use good quality Access Points like Ruckus Wireless.

Mitul

On May 7, 2012 1:55 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be 
mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be wrote:


All,

has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP
clients? Does this work properly? What models/brands are optimal
for this (in terms of ease of use, battery life etc)?

Thx!!

B.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Mitul Limbani
Yeah well Snom M9 is a Wifi DECT Phone (it creates its own 2.4Ghz Frequency
which is understood only between Base Station n M9 Units, It works just
like your standard Chordless phones) difference being that the Base station
is SIP enabled.

SIP Droid is great to work with, it solves most of the issues.

You should definitely give it a shot.

Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Chief Architech  Founder,
Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
110 Reena Complex, Opp. Nathani Steel,
Vidyavihar (W), Mumbai - 400 086. India
http://www.enterux.com/
http://www.entvoice.com/
email: mi...@enterux.in
DID: +91-22-61447605
Cell: +91-9820332422




On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.bewrote:

  Hi,

 thx! The Snom M9 does not look like a Wifi phone however, nor is it a
 smarthpone. In order to use that I would have to use access points that can
 handle both Wifi and DECT. Astraa seems to have (an expensive) one.

 SIPDroid crossed my mind. You say they work OK but the latency is
 problematic? Is the experience as a whole then not poblematic?

 thx!

 B.




 On 05/07/12 10:29, Mitul Limbani wrote:

 Used the Snom M9 Wifi DECT phones, they work like charm.

 SIPDroid on Android phones work good too, however latency is going to be
 nightmare for u in softphone n wifi kinda scenario.

 Use good quality Access Points like Ruckus Wireless.

 Mitul
 On May 7, 2012 1:55 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be wrote:

 All,

 has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients? Does
 this work properly? What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of
 ease of use, battery life etc)?

 Thx!!

 B.

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com   --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com   --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Benny Amorsen
Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be writes:

 has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients?

Yes...

 Does this work properly?

It works nicely for home use for power users who can accept the odd lost
call and know how to restart the app or the phone when something goes
wrong. Unfortunately I haven't found anything so far which works for
business use.

The largest problem is that smartphones can't afford (battery-wise) to
check for wifi connectivity all the time. If the phone loses connection
to the wifi, it often takes more than a minute before it is ready to
receive calls again.

 What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of ease of use,
 battery life etc)?

iPhone, Android, and Symbian are about equally troublesome.


/Benny


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx

Benny,

very useful, thank you.
So, in short, at this stage it's best to go DECT for wireless and if 
DECT and Wifi need to be combined (because both types of devices exist 
in the organization), it's preferable to go to access points that offer 
both networks.


Correct?

thx,

BC



On 05/07/12 10:57, Benny Amorsen wrote:

Bart Coninckxbart.conin...@telenet.be  writes:


has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients?

Yes...


Does this work properly?

It works nicely for home use for power users who can accept the odd lost
call and know how to restart the app or the phone when something goes
wrong. Unfortunately I haven't found anything so far which works for
business use.

The largest problem is that smartphones can't afford (battery-wise) to
check for wifi connectivity all the time. If the phone loses connection
to the wifi, it often takes more than a minute before it is ready to
receive calls again.


What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of ease of use,
battery life etc)?

iPhone, Android, and Symbian are about equally troublesome.


/Benny


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] chan_dahdi with asterisk 1.4 and new Linux versions

2012-05-07 Thread bilal ghayyad
Dear Tzafrir;

For sure I re run ./configure

Actually, I formatted the machine and reinstalled .. also I removed the 
asterisk 1.4 and extracted again and I ran ./configure, make and make install. 
All of these I tried !

As long the Linux OS is new, then it is not possible to get chan_dahdi. And if 
the OS is new, then we can not compile old DAHDI (versions before 2.4 and maybe 
2.4 it self can not be compiled if the OS is new).

I tried Fedora and Ubuntu.

But with asterisk 1.8, things are running well.

Any help?
Regards
Bilal


--
 
 On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:24:56AM -0700, bilal ghayyad
 wrote:
 
  
  What is happening with me that when I used fedora core
 16, I compiled
  and installed dahdi 2.6 and then compiled and installed
 asterisk 1.4
  and it did not create chan_dahdi. I tried to select it
 by running make
  menuselect and I discover that it is not possible !! By
 the way: this
  problem is not existed with old linux versions .. 
 
 Have you re-run ./configure ?
 
 -- 
            
    Tzafrir Cohen
 icq#16849755             
 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
 +972-50-7952406       
    mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
 http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 ( 
http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have 
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?


thx,

BC


On 05/07/12 10:57, Benny Amorsen wrote:

Bart Coninckxbart.conin...@telenet.be  writes:


has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients?

Yes...


Does this work properly?

It works nicely for home use for power users who can accept the odd lost
call and know how to restart the app or the phone when something goes
wrong. Unfortunately I haven't found anything so far which works for
business use.

The largest problem is that smartphones can't afford (battery-wise) to
check for wifi connectivity all the time. If the phone loses connection
to the wifi, it often takes more than a minute before it is ready to
receive calls again.


What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of ease of use,
battery life etc)?

iPhone, Android, and Symbian are about equally troublesome.


/Benny


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Mitul Limbani
Well in that case, you might seriously want to look @ M9 they are cost
effective n definitely work.

Most of these cell phone type looking phones have a serious battery
drainage problem.

Smartphones really have a long way to understand how to preserve battery
and deliver one thing (i.e. calls) very effectively, infact a Multi
Function device (MFD) like smart phone has this issue.

Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Chief Architech  Founder,
Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
110 Reena Complex, Opp. Nathani Steel,
Vidyavihar (W), Mumbai - 400 086. India
http://www.enterux.com/
http://www.entvoice.com/
email: mi...@enterux.in
DID: +91-22-61447605
Cell: +91-9820332422




On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.bewrote:

  What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
 http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php  ) ? Does anyone have
 experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?


 thx,

 BC


 On 05/07/12 10:57, Benny Amorsen wrote:

 Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be bart.conin...@telenet.be writes:


  has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients?

  Yes...


  Does this work properly?

  It works nicely for home use for power users who can accept the odd lost
 call and know how to restart the app or the phone when something goes
 wrong. Unfortunately I haven't found anything so far which works for
 business use.

 The largest problem is that smartphones can't afford (battery-wise) to
 check for wifi connectivity all the time. If the phone loses connection
 to the wifi, it often takes more than a minute before it is ready to
 receive calls again.


  What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of ease of use,
 battery life etc)?

  iPhone, Android, and Symbian are about equally troublesome.


 /Benny


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com   --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com   --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Benny Amorsen
man, 07 05 2012 kl. 12:03 +0200, skrev Bart Coninckx:
 What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800
 ( http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
 experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?

I don't know that particular phone, but dedicated wifi phones definitely
CAN work for professional use. E.g. ASCOM phones work absolutely great,
they are just expensive.


/Benny



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx
The phone I pointed to is a WiFi phone, the M9 is a DECT phone. 
Different animal. The question is regarding using WiFi as the WiFi 
infrastructure is already in place.


I understand smartphones is not a good option, but what about these WiFi 
SIP phones?


thx!

B.



On 05/07/12 12:21, Mitul Limbani wrote:
Well in that case, you might seriously want to look @ M9 they are cost 
effective n definitely work.


Most of these cell phone type looking phones have a serious battery 
drainage problem.


Smartphones really have a long way to understand how to preserve 
battery and deliver one thing (i.e. calls) very effectively, infact a 
Multi Function device (MFD) like smart phone has this issue.


Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Chief Architech  Founder,
Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
110 Reena Complex, Opp. Nathani Steel,
Vidyavihar (W), Mumbai - 400 086. India
http://www.enterux.com/
http://www.entvoice.com/
email: mi...@enterux.in mailto:mi...@enterux.in
DID: +91-22-61447605
Cell: +91-9820332422




On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Bart Coninckx 
bart.conin...@telenet.be mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be wrote:


What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection
losses?


thx,

BC


On 05/07/12 10:57, Benny Amorsen wrote:

Bart Coninckxbart.conin...@telenet.be  mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be  
writes:


has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients?

Yes...


Does this work properly?

It works nicely for home use for power users who can accept the odd lost
call and know how to restart the app or the phone when something goes
wrong. Unfortunately I haven't found anything so far which works for
business use.

The largest problem is that smartphones can't afford (battery-wise) to
check for wifi connectivity all the time. If the phone loses connection
to the wifi, it often takes more than a minute before it is ready to
receive calls again.


What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of ease of use,
battery life etc)?

iPhone, Android, and Symbian are about equally troublesome.


/Benny


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided byhttp://www.api-digital.com  --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello


asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread giovanni.v

Il 07/05/2012 10.46, Mitul Limbani ha scritto:

Yeah well Snom M9 is a Wifi DECT Phone (it creates its own 2.4Ghz
Frequency which is understood only between Base Station n M9 Units


Certainly nothing to do with wifi, neither the frequency/phisical layer 
nor the protocols involved matches.


- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DECT
- 
http://wiki.snom.com/FAQ/What_is_the_channel_diagram_for_DECT_6.0_between_EU_and_US


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Jeremy Kister

On 5/7/2012 4:24 AM, Bart Coninckx wrote:

has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients? Does
this work properly? What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of
ease of use, battery life etc)?


www.acrobits.cz has Acrobits and Groundwire, which are both great on 
iPhone.  They also ahve software for Android, but I cant attest.


--

Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx


On 05/07/12 13:04, Benny Amorsen wrote:

man, 07 05 2012 kl. 12:03 +0200, skrev Bart Coninckx:

What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800
( http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?

I don't know that particular phone, but dedicated wifi phones definitely
CAN work for professional use. E.g. ASCOM phones work absolutely great,
they are just expensive.


/Benny


Does anyone know how things have evolved regarding sessions/call 
handover in wifi? I remember reading this document in 2008: 
http://www.abpsec.com/blog/the-dect-versus-wlan-wifi-debate/ 
http://www.abpsec.com/blog/the-dect-versus-wlan-wifi-debate/
which basically states that it's a bad idea as interruptions of 70 ms 
are involved.


Is this still a challenge?

Rgds,

BC
http://www.abpsec.com/blog/the-dect-versus-wlan-wifi-debate/
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread giovanni.v

Bart Coninckx wrote:

I understand smartphones is not a good option, but what about these WiFi
SIP phones?


I thing smartfones simply lack a business grade softhone implementation.

WiFi SIP phones share some problem with smartphones: battery runtime 
and, most important, roaming and handover.


In WiFi network handling roaming/handover is up to the client, this is 
the same kind of problem that arises in mobile WiFi POS systems. 
Compared to DECT standard which implements roaming/handover this is a 
major drawback.


Implementing a proper roaming/handover in WiFi networks, using wireless 
controllers and suitable access points, is very expensive. Where such 
expensive WiFi infrastructure have to be built only to properly serve 
wireless phones a DECT multicell system is definitely a winner 
considering coverage, features and battery runtime.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Bart Coninckx

On 05/07/12 13:50, giovanni.v wrote:

I thing smartfones simply lack a business grade softhone implementation.

WiFi SIP phones share some problem with smartphones: battery runtime 
and, most important, roaming and handover.


In WiFi network handling roaming/handover is up to the client, this is 
the same kind of problem that arises in mobile WiFi POS systems. 
Compared to DECT standard which implements roaming/handover this is a 
major drawback.


Implementing a proper roaming/handover in WiFi networks, using 
wireless controllers and suitable access points, is very expensive. 
Where such expensive WiFi infrastructure have to be built only to 
properly serve wireless phones a DECT multicell system is definitely a 
winner considering coverage, features and battery runtime.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Giovanni,

I think you're completely right. Even to this day, it seems that Wifi is 
not ready for voice, except while investing a lot of time/money.

DECT it is,

BC


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] How to hang up a call after sending SendDTMF() ?

2012-05-07 Thread Shahid H
When SendDTMF() finish the process then I want to hang up the call after 20
seconds.. What is the solution to do this?

I know there is S(x) option for Dial() application but it still count
during SendDTMF() process.

Thanks
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-07 Thread Nunya Biznatch



Finally, I'll have a Windows-based workstation that will be used to
remote into all the services, for administration, etc...


Why?

Unfortunately, the existing PBX Administration Software only works on 
WinBloze. I'm stuck with it until I can decommission it.



I need to plan to use FreePBX on all Asterisk Servers, but I don't
intend to install it until I'm in regular MAC maintenance mode.

It is ashame you are going this far with your setup to rely on 
FreePBX.  For something this complex, you are setting your self up for 
some heartache.


It is my intention to do everything from the command line. However, 
there will be times when I'll have Interns coming in and doing some of 
the MAC activities, and I thought this might be an easier way for the 
day to day to get done. I've never seen it myself either, so am curious. 
Finally, there's the glitter factor. When my bosses come in and want a 
dog and pony show on the new phone system, they want to see fluffy 
bunnies and kittens, not the Ox that's doing the pulling. CLI = old in 
the minds of those that don't comprehend.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] chan_dahdi with asterisk 1.4 and new Linux versions

2012-05-07 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:59:17AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
 Dear Tzafrir;
 
 For sure I re run ./configure
 
 Actually, I formatted the machine and reinstalled .. also I removed the 
 asterisk 1.4 and extracted again and I ran ./configure, make and make 
 install. All of these I tried !
 
 As long the Linux OS is new, then it is not possible to get chan_dahdi. And 
 if the OS is new, then we can not compile old DAHDI (versions before 2.4 and 
 maybe 2.4 it self can not be compiled if the OS is new).
 
 I tried Fedora and Ubuntu.
 
 But with asterisk 1.8, things are running well.

What is chan_dahdi missing?

  ./menuselect/contrib/dummy-select -c
  ./menuselect/contrib/dummy-select -m chan_dahdi -v

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400P: Lifetime Replacement

2012-05-07 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:42:16AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
 I have a Digium TDM400P card that appears to have died. The first noted
 symptoms were that dahdi would fail to reload on boot. On closer
 inspection, the card looks totally dead; no lights on at all.

Does the device show up in lspci?

-- 
Russ Meyerriecks
Digium, Inc. | Brogrammer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
direct: +1 256-428-6025
Check us out at: www.digium.com  www.asterisk.org

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400P: Lifetime Replacement

2012-05-07 Thread Greg Woods
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:26 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
 On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:42:16AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
  I have a Digium TDM400P card that appears to have died. The first noted
  symptoms were that dahdi would fail to reload on boot. On closer
  inspection, the card looks totally dead; no lights on at all.
 
 Does the device show up in lspci?

I'll check that when I get home tonight; I didn't try lspci. But it does
NOT show up in dmesg at boot time, which means it probably won't be
there for lspci either.

--Greg



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] 1.8 busypatterns

2012-05-07 Thread Sebastian Gutierrez
Hi,


is it possible to detect 4 length pattern busy cadence detection on FXO lines 
in 1.8??

Here the tones are:

425Hz Pattern(0.2ms on, 0.2ms off, 0.2ms on, 0.6ms off)


in asterisk 1.4 busy detect worked
in asterisk 1.6 didn´t work and i was told that 1.6 can´t handle 4 length 
patterns, but what about 1.8??

for now I can only hangup by asking the provider polarity switch.

Thanks

best regards.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Roger Burton West
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:03:17PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection
losses?

I've been using a UTStarcom GF-210 for the last year and more as my
personal phone - dual-mode 2G GSM and SIP/802.11. Sound quality on SIP
is slightly better than 2G, getting it to talk to Asterisk is no problem
at all, but certainly if you're moving from one wifi device to another
you will get dropped calls. If that's your use case, it's going to be
that way whatever hardware you use - I haven't seen any implementations
of 802.11F or 802.11r in the field.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 19:03 +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
 On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:03:17PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
 What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
 http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
 experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection
 losses?
 
 I've been using a UTStarcom GF-210 for the last year and more as my
 personal phone - dual-mode 2G GSM and SIP/802.11. Sound quality on SIP
 is slightly better than 2G, getting it to talk to Asterisk is no problem
 at all, but certainly if you're moving from one wifi device to another
 you will get dropped calls. If that's your use case, it's going to be
 that way whatever hardware you use - I haven't seen any implementations
 of 802.11F or 802.11r in the field.
 

Hope that these are better that the utstar F1000:
Keep on re-chargibg as battery is empty in no-time, and security is
lousy; just  wep, no wpa.

hw


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients

2012-05-07 Thread Roger Burton West
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:14:36PM +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote:

Hope that these are better that the utstar F1000:
Keep on re-chargibg as battery is empty in no-time, and security is
lousy; just  wep, no wpa.

WPA and WPA2. Battery lasts about a day in dual mode, much longer in
2G-only of course. And at UKP30 they may be worth a punt even if you end
up upgrading to something else.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in thebackground after call sucessfully answered.

2012-05-07 Thread Maarten
motty.cruz motty.cruz at gmail.com writes:

 
 
 Hello I apologize for not being specific. 
 
 I'm using SIP. Our provider is call Wiline. I do not have Dahdi install on
 this server. The phone I used is Polycom soundpoint ip 450. 
 
 Rining continues in the background after successfully answered, is a ramdom
 not constantly. 
 
 Thanks, 
 -Motty
 
 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny 
Nicholas
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:54 AM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in thebackground
 after call sucessfully answered.
 
 Which Technology are you using for the call (DAHDI/SIP/other)?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of motty.cruz
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM
 To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in the background
 after call sucessfully answered.
 
 Hello All,
 I upgraded Asterisk from 1.8.4 to Asterisk 1.8.10.1 last week. After the
 upgrade when I make a call and the other party answers the call a ringing
 tone is heard in the background even thought the call was successfully
 answered. 
 
 This issue is ramdom and is not consistent. I do think is a Asterisk issue
 can some one point me a solution. 
 
 Thanks,
 Motty
 
 --
 _

Hello Motty,

I have the exact same issue with several Polycom Soundpoint IP 450's.
The phones are using the Broadsoft platform. Seeing your problem on an
Asterisk platform makes me think this is a Polycom issue.

We have two other types of phones: Polycom Soundpoint IP 331 and 650's.
These types do not have these problems at all.

I'm going to contact Polycom to see if they have any record of this issue.
Please contact me if you happen to stumble upon a solution!

Regards,

Maarten



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.8 busypatterns

2012-05-07 Thread Jonathan Rose
- Original Message -
 From: Sebastian Gutierrez scg...@gmail.com
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Monday, May 7, 2012 10:38:03 AM
 Subject: [asterisk-users] 1.8 busypatterns
 
 Hi,
 
 
 
 
 is it possible to detect 4 length pattern busy cadence detection on
 FXO lines in 1.8??
 
 
 Here the tones are:
 
 
 
 
 425Hz Pattern(0.2ms on, 0.2ms off, 0.2ms on, 0.6ms off)
 
 
 in asterisk 1.4 busy detect worked
 in asterisk 1.6 didn´t work and i was told that 1.6 can´t handle 4
 length patterns, but what about 1.8??
 
 
 for now I can only hangup by asking the provider polarity switch.
 
 
 Thanks
 
 
 best regards.
 


No. I implemented this in Asterisk 10.

From the CHANGES file:

from CHANGES in the trunk:
--
--- Functionality changes from Asterisk 1.8 to Asterisk 10 ---
--
...
chan_dahdi
--
 * Busy tone patterns featuring 2 silence and 2 tone lengths can now be used
   with busydetect.  usage example: busypattern=200,200,200,600

So you'll need to upgrade to Asterisk 10 if you want to use that feature.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in thebackground after call sucessfully answered.

2012-05-07 Thread motty.cruz
Hello Maarten, 
Our issue was with our VOIP provider or so I think, because after I called
my provider the issued went away, I have not heard any complaints since, it
happened a few times two days in a row then it went away. 

Hopefully you documented time and phone numbers when it happened and take it
to your provider. Good luck finding the solution for your problem. 

Thanks, 
Motty 

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Maarten
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:37 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in thebackground
after call sucessfully answered.

motty.cruz motty.cruz at gmail.com writes:

 
 
 Hello I apologize for not being specific. 
 
 I'm using SIP. Our provider is call Wiline. I do not have Dahdi 
 install on this server. The phone I used is Polycom soundpoint ip 450.
 
 Rining continues in the background after successfully answered, is a 
 ramdom not constantly.
 
 Thanks,
 -Motty
 
 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com 
 [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
 Danny
Nicholas
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:54 AM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in 
 thebackground after call sucessfully answered.
 
 Which Technology are you using for the call (DAHDI/SIP/other)?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com 
 [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
 motty.cruz
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM
 To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.10.1 ring tone in the 
 background after call sucessfully answered.
 
 Hello All,
 I upgraded Asterisk from 1.8.4 to Asterisk 1.8.10.1 last week. After 
 the upgrade when I make a call and the other party answers the call a 
 ringing tone is heard in the background even thought the call was 
 successfully answered.
 
 This issue is ramdom and is not consistent. I do think is a Asterisk 
 issue can some one point me a solution.
 
 Thanks,
 Motty
 
 --
 _

Hello Motty,

I have the exact same issue with several Polycom Soundpoint IP 450's.
The phones are using the Broadsoft platform. Seeing your problem on an
Asterisk platform makes me think this is a Polycom issue.

We have two other types of phones: Polycom Soundpoint IP 331 and 650's.
These types do not have these problems at all.

I'm going to contact Polycom to see if they have any record of this issue.
Please contact me if you happen to stumble upon a solution!

Regards,

Maarten



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4983 - Release Date: 05/07/12


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.8 busypatterns

2012-05-07 Thread Sebastian
Can you point me to the commit to see if i can backport it?

Thanks
El 07/05/2012 18:50, Jonathan Rose jr...@digium.com escribió:

 - Original Message -
  From: Sebastian Gutierrez scg...@gmail.com
  To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Sent: Monday, May 7, 2012 10:38:03 AM
  Subject: [asterisk-users] 1.8 busypatterns
 
  Hi,
 
 
 
 
  is it possible to detect 4 length pattern busy cadence detection on
  FXO lines in 1.8??
 
 
  Here the tones are:
 
 
 
 
  425Hz Pattern(0.2ms on, 0.2ms off, 0.2ms on, 0.6ms off)
 
 
  in asterisk 1.4 busy detect worked
  in asterisk 1.6 didn´t work and i was told that 1.6 can´t handle 4
  length patterns, but what about 1.8??
 
 
  for now I can only hangup by asking the provider polarity switch.
 
 
  Thanks
 
 
  best regards.
 


 No. I implemented this in Asterisk 10.

 From the CHANGES file:

 from CHANGES in the trunk:

 --
 --- Functionality changes from Asterisk 1.8 to Asterisk 10
 ---

 --
 ...
 chan_dahdi
 --
  * Busy tone patterns featuring 2 silence and 2 tone lengths can now be
 used
   with busydetect.  usage example: busypattern=200,200,200,600

 So you'll need to upgrade to Asterisk 10 if you want to use that feature.

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400P: Lifetime Replacement

2012-05-07 Thread Greg Woods
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:26 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
 On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:42:16AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
  I have a Digium TDM400P card that appears to have died. The first noted
  symptoms were that dahdi would fail to reload on boot. On closer
  inspection, the card looks totally dead; no lights on at all.
 
 Does the device show up in lspci?

I just checked, and as expected, it does not show up with lspci (all of
the other PCI devices do).

--Greg



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Edwards

On Mon, 7 May 2012, Nunya Biznatch wrote:

It is my intention to do everything from the command line. However, 
there will be times when I'll have Interns coming in and doing some of 
the MAC activities, and I thought this might be an easier way for the 
day to day to get done.


Sounds like a recipe for hard to find problems to me.

You'll change something, they'll change something, something will be 
broken.


I'd suggest one or the other.

Personally, I like plain text configuration files because I can annotate 
them with a modification history showing what I* changed, when, and why.


I can also use tools like 'diff' to compare working to broken 
configurations.


I back up all of the configuration files for all of the hosts** for all of 
the clients I administer every day. Each host runs a script to stuff 
everything I think is important into a tarball and email it to a 'backup' 
email address at my office. If I really trash something on a client host, 
I can always get the last known good files.


I have the tarballs going back 5 years so if a client every said 'hey, 
remember when you did...' I can pull a rabbit out of my hat.


*) I usually work alone or in small (2-4) teams.

**) I skip hosts that are supposed to be exact clones of other hosts.

--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve Edwards   sedwa...@sedwards.com  Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline  Fax: +1-760-731-3000

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users