Hi,
Though I cant say its a bug or feature, but the way you think it should
work then try setting correct priority..i.e 1 in custom and then 2 in the
other context.
Somehow I'm having a feeling that this won't work.
Also AFAIK macros are being replaced by Go-SUB thing. Macros cant be called
in
Hello,
Asterisk : asterisk-1.6.0.5
Dahdi: dahdi-linux-complete-2.5.1
Kernel Version: 2.6.18-128.el5xen
AS_1 kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 00 on CPU 0.
Message from syslogd@ at Tue Sep 4 11:46:57 2012 ...
AS_1 kernel: Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
Message from
Hello!
I have an Asterisk box that has multiple (over 50) individual accounts
registering against Ericsson IMS pbx. Problem is, that when there’s a problem
in the network, asterisk will retry to register all the accounts at once,
causing the IMS to think it is an attack and block the ip.
I had problems on the Raspberry, like stuttering calls (just in between the
calls), maybe it was because of call recording but I would expect one call
recording to be not too much. However I used the packages from the repo,
maybe compiling it yourself and leaving out unnecessary stuff gives beter
Hi,
I have configured asterisk with Sangoma analog card. Outbound and
Inbound calls are working fine. I have issue with CDR for outbound call.
When I call to 0X number using sip/test, CDR is created between
sip and dahdi channel.
Here is CDR and CEL :-
How about stripping it down to bare minimum's?
Regards,
Qasim
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Stefan at WPF
stefan.at@googlemail.comwrote:
I had problems on the Raspberry, like stuttering calls (just in between
the calls), maybe it was because of call recording but I would expect one
Guess this is what most people are doing by compiling only necessary stuff.
Personally I find this is to much fidling and contraproductive. Just bought
a small Atom System. Hope it works better.
2012/9/4 qasimak...@gmail.com qasimak...@gmail.com
How about stripping it down to bare minimum's?
Intel Atom has a whole lot of processing power as compared to RaspberryPi.
Asterisk has modular approach do it dosen't make any difference if you
compile only necessary stuff. You can exclude modules in runtime also and
it will serve you the same purpose.
Regards,
Qasim
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at
Yes, but I guess finding all encessary modules is also a lot of fiddling,
isn't it?
2012/9/4 qasimak...@gmail.com qasimak...@gmail.com
Intel Atom has a whole lot of processing power as compared to RaspberryPi.
Asterisk has modular approach do it dosen't make any difference if you
compile only
On Friday, August 31, 2012 06:48:46 PM Noah Engelberth wrote:
I’m trying to set up a way that our users can send an XMPP message to
Asterisk (unsolicited) to request information, such as voicemail
status or the like. No matter what I set for the dialplan, I’m only
seeing Asterisk
I'm migrating from Asterisk 1.6.2 to 10.7.0. In 1.6.2, I made a small
patch to allow specifying an address for RTP media. That worked. In
10.7.0, this appears to be built in with media_address, but it doesn't
work for me.
My Asterisk server has multiple addresses, all global address on two
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:00:55PM +0530, Chandrakant Solanki wrote:
Hello,
Asterisk : asterisk-1.6.0.5
Dahdi: dahdi-linux-complete-2.5.1
Kernel Version: 2.6.18-128.el5xen
AS_1 kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 00 on CPU 0.
Message from syslogd@ at Tue Sep 4 11:46:57 2012
- Original Message -
From: Noah Engelberth n...@directlinkcomputers.com
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 7:14:35 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Receiving and processing unsolicitedXMPP
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 17:53 +, Giuseppe Longo wrote:
Hi,
has anyone tried asterisk on arm processors? how is the performance?
have encountered problems in the compilation?
Have run asterisk up to 1.4 using openembeded on several arm boards in
the past.
In general works well with sip/iax
On 9/3/2012 6:46 AM, John Novack wrote:
PedroTron wrote:
2012/9/3 Andrew Colin a...@syrex.cc:
Can you confirm Dahdi is loaded correctly
What does the output of dmesg show?
dmesg output
[ 22.183501] dahdi: Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
[ 22.183504] dahdi: Version: 2.5.1
[
qasimakhan at gmail.com qasimakhan at gmail.com writes:
Hi,I was testing with newly introduced websocket support in asterisk 11. I
have successfully implemented everything except when i try to make a call i get
no audio. I have tried both SipML5 as well as SIP-JS as clients. the call get
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 13:58 +0500, qasimak...@gmail.com wrote:
How about stripping it down to bare minimum's?
How about an other ARM-board?
http://gooseberry.atspace.co.uk/?page_id=13
Specifically the more mem (4GB) will help..
hw
--
I'm getting cycles of repeated crashes which occur and then stop occurring.
Looking at the dumps via gdb shows that something peculiar is happening
that looks like memory corruption:
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0 0x003686e30285 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) up
#1
- Original Message -
From: Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 5:56:37 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Repeated Asterisk 10.7.0 crashes
I'm getting cycles of repeated crashes which occur and then stop
occurring.
Who's responsible for it? Lumenvox is the only place that distributes
it, but they can't do anything with it since they get it from Digium.
However, the current version doesn't work with Asterisk 10.7.1 and the
latest version of Lumenvox software (it appears that a timeout is
being set to zero).
There's a page on running Asterisk under valgrind on the wiki here:
I looked at the code in question and I don't see how the below is possible.
What am I missing?
==10429== Invalid write of size 1
==10429==at 0x3686E68744: vsnprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==10429==by 0x53C766:
There's a page on running Asterisk under valgrind on the wiki here:
Thanks for the pointer. Valgrind wasn't needed since Asterisk MALLOC_DEBUG
was enough.
It took almost 1.5 hours in GDB, but I found it. Because I was having
problems with res_speech_lumenvox, I was using UniMRCP, which uses
Thanks :).
Regards,
Qasim
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:52 AM, James Mortensen
james.morten...@a-cti.comwrote:
qasimakhan at gmail.com qasimakhan at gmail.com writes:
Hi,I was testing with newly introduced websocket support in asterisk 11.
I
have successfully implemented everything except
23 matches
Mail list logo
