Re: [asterisk-users] Call drop weirdness

2012-11-10 Thread Chris Nighswonger
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Chris Nighswonger cnighswon...@foundations.edu wrote: I'm running Asterisk 10.7.0 with three sip trunks to my call termination provider. For the most part everything works great. However, at apparently random times and usually about 20 mins or

[asterisk-users] Asterisk crashing when trying to start a Jabber session with ejabberd

2012-11-10 Thread Phil Reynolds
I have tried today to change my Jabber server from OpenFire to ejabberd. Unfortunately I have not been able to get Asterisk logged in to Jabber since. If SASL is not enabled, then ejabberd rejects the connection as it does not support non-SASL authentication. However, if SASL is enabled, Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Web based Click to Call Application

2012-11-10 Thread Shitian Long
more specific, Asterisk Manager Interface , originate action will help you to do so. On Nov 9, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: If you want to have a good level of control, AMI is the way to go. If you just want simple and quick, .call files is going to do it. I

Re: [asterisk-users] Web based Click to Call Application

2012-11-10 Thread Markus Weiler
Hi, I suppose WebRTC is the best solution nowadays, it's extremely interesting. I developed a C2C app in 2008, starting with call files and AMI, ended with asterisk-java and asterisk.NET to solve it. Hint: Try to solve (al)most (all) of your problems using Dialplans/Variables. Basically it's

Re: [asterisk-users] Web based Click to Call Application

2012-11-10 Thread Adolphe Cher-Aime
Hi Marcus, You're right,WebRTC is the way to go. The only drawback is the fact that only astersik 11 support it natively. On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Markus Weiler markus_wei...@mailworks.orgwrote: Hi, I suppose WebRTC is the best solution nowadays, it's extremely interesting. I

Re: [asterisk-users] Web based Click to Call Application

2012-11-10 Thread Joshua Colp
Adolphe Cher-Aime wrote: Hi Marcus, You're right,WebRTC is the way to go. The only drawback is the fact that only astersik 11 support it natively. It's also not yet finished. Specifications are still being discussed, finalized, completed. Implementations have certainly come a long way but