Re: [asterisk-users] Paging for Praying
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:41:30AM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote: [snip] Wow. Didn't know there was a rule... I never got the whole argument. If the flow is top posting, I top post. If I am certain I can answer a simple question with a simple answer, sometimes I will just top post. The first rule of asterisk mailing lists ... /coat Steve -- NetTek Ltd UK mob +44 7775 755503 UK +44 20 3432 3735 / US +1 (206) 309-2461 / Fax +44 20 7483 2455 social id stevekennedyuk Euro Tech News Blog http://eurotechnews.blogspot.com MSN st...@gbnet.net -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Top Posting
As I did two years ago, I'm posting a new thread with the Top Posting subject rather than hijacking the Paging for Praying thread. Two questions: 1. Steve K: What do you mean by /coat? 2. How do we change rule #5? --Don Don Kelly PCF Corp People Come First 651 842-1000 651 842-1001 fax -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk seg fault 1.4.43
Shouldn't there be: ao2_lock()/ao2_unlock() and ao2_ref()'s in the ast_readaudio_callback() function What if a hangup is happening while in this function? That seems like what could be happening. Jerry -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Volume of messages on asterisk-users mailing list.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:41:30AM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote: Even more off topic. Can someone smarter than me get the post totals for each year? I was #1 one year. I am not even talking about individual post counts though. It just seems the list has died for the most part. There is a graph of the daily posting rate at: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.user If you click on the image you'll get the raw data which looks something like: date posting-rate spam-rate 20030217 11 0 20030218 54 0 20030219 67 0 20030220 42 0 20030221 43 0 20030222 28 0 20030223 41 0 ... I'll leave generating the yearly totals as an exercise for the gentle reader. You can see from the graph how much the activity on the mailing list has dropped off. I imagine that should be expected as the technology matures and there are other good sources of documentation. Also, there are active forums [1] for those who do not want to be bothered by top vs bottom posting and want a more tighly controlled presentation of any discussions. [1] http://forums.asterisk.org. -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote: 2. How do we change rule #5? -1. -- Thanks in advance, - Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000-- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Users list email totals by year .
2003, 24471 2004, 48608 2005, 59116 2006, 41215 2007, 26414 2008, 20746 2009, 18304 2010, 14948 2011, 11588 2012, 7542 -- +--+ | James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS | | NetworkSystem Engineer | 3237 Holden Road | Give me Linux | | bab...@baby-dragons.com | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 | only on AXP | +--+ -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 30/12/2012, Steve Edwards wrote: On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote: 2. How do we change rule #5? -1. + -1 from me too! Ie I dislike top-posting on mailing lists and if a democratic approach was taken to rule changes (I have no idea is this is the case?) then I would vote against the change. Just my 2c since we're discussing it. Pete smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] DECT phone for home: siemens A510 v. Grandstream DP715
Hi Roy others. Sorry for the delayed reply to this thread. The holiday period delayed my testing of the A510 and C610 range further, but I have now had a chance to give them a little 'ear time'. On 12/12/2012, at 5:30 PM, Co-op Vacation Rentals coo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for testing these out. You said you like the 510 vs 580. Which one is newer? I have the 580. I'm staying tuned for your review of the 610. The 580 isn't DECT compatible and only supports some of the Gigaset handsets. I might sell mine and upgrade depending on what you learn about it. Can you tell me a little more about what you are testing for? Quality? Simultaneous In/Outgoing Calls using 1 or Multiple SIP accounts. Conference Calling? Any other Features? My tests were just for basic functionality of the devices as normal run of the mill phones. I wanted to know for example, weather they had any annoying 'glitches' like the 580's insistence on telling me You have new messages when there is only a missed call, or other practical usage issues. After testing the A510 and C610 my opinion is that I would go for the C610 any day. I suspect the A510 is a 'newer' release than the A580 (which seems to be EOL now), however I'm not entirely certain about that. The web GUI for the 510 and the 610 are visually very similar, but both are different to the 580. I suspect the 510/610 run a newer shared firmware which has evolved from the 580 (the 510/610 GUI gives hints of this and it looks overall far more polished than the 580). The 510 handset is quite basic (lower-res mono with coloured backlight). The 610 handset is visually similar to the 510 (although not the same), but more glossy and has a much nicer LCD (colour, higher res). I suspect the 610's handset CPU is a little faster too. I'm surprised to hear you say the 580 isn't DECT compatible. It's manual indicates it supports both DECT and GAP, so should be able to take handset registrations from other brand handsets (and also register the Gigaset handsets with other DECT bases, if desired). Is this not your experience? I note that the range of other Gigaset handsets compatible with the 580 base is a reasonable list too, as shown at hte URL you provided: http://gigaset.com/us/en/cms/PageCustomerServicesCompatibility.html Your link indicates that the C610H handset can be used with your A580OIP base. I reckon that would be worth giving a try because the 610 is a nice handset and if it works with your bases then it might be a good solution for additional phones. I haven't tested this at all with the 580, but I can confirm that the A510 and C610 do happily interoperate with each other (ie, I was able to register my A510H with the C610 base and then my C610H with the A510 base). Once the second handset was registered with the base, I created a second SIP account login definition and assigned the first account to the first handset and the second account to the second handset. You can define which handsets receive incoming calls on a per SIP account basis and also define which SIP account each handset will use for outgoing calls on an individual handset basis. The configuration options available on each model of base (510/610) appear to be identical. This is what makes me think they share a common firmware. Both handsets do provide notification for missed calls, but thankfully they can be configured via the base-station configuration to not flash their MWI led for this condition. What I haven't tried (due to not having any) is registering a standard DECT cordless (one that comes with a PoTS analog base) to either of the Gigaset base-stations. If that does work OK (fingers crossed), these base-stations could be a great upgrade for households with existing analog DECT cordlesses. Anyway, to wrap up, a note on the other items you asked - I did test 2 simultaneous SIP calls on separate accounts (and also calling each other via the Asterisk server). I only tested with ulaw since that's all we use on this server. So note that I haven't tested running 2 concurrent calls using a CPU intensive codec; that would be interesting, but out of scope for what I'm looking right now. Call quality with 2 ulaw calls in progress is great, just as good as a single. I didn't give 3-way conference any decent time testing I'm afraid. I did have a shot at it following the instructions in the manual on the 610 but seemed to only be able to effect a call transfer, not a 3-way bridge. But I really didn't give that any decent time and I'm fairly sure that it was me doing something wrong there before moving on and not going back. I have both phones here for another fortnight or so. If there is something specific you want tested then let me know and I'll see if I can oblige. Otherwise my recommendation is focus on the 610 for now - it's a nice wee phone which isn't all that much more expensive, and possibly able to be retro-fitted to your existing
Re: [asterisk-users] Digital accoustics trying to register to asterisk 1.4.43
On 14/12/2012, at 9:51 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: I did notice one more thing: chan_sip.c:17045 handle_request_register: Registration from '5001sip:5001%4010.239.46.200@10.239.46.200' failed for '137.52.88.195' - No matching peer found Why is there no matching peer I have it defined. I shows in my sip show peers? I wonder if in fact you have entered into the phone's web GUI the username 5001@10.239.46.200 when you should have just entered 5001 (with the server name being defined elsewhere in the config, eg as the 'domain' value or the 'proxy' value). It looks to me as if the phone has encoded the string '5001@10.239.46.200' into the username '5001%4010.239.46.200' and then tried to connect to the server 10.239.46.200 as that user (when in fact you actually want it to simply connect as '5001'). Worth trying? Could be a quick fix... Pete smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I'm a +1 for the change, should it come to a vote. I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting inline. But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order so any reader could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the chain. A new reader scrolls to the bottom and reads up. - Logan On Dec 29, 2012 7:22 PM, Pete Mundy p...@fiberphone.co.nz wrote: On 30/12/2012, Steve Edwards wrote: On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote: 2. How do we change rule #5? -1. + -1 from me too! Ie I dislike top-posting on mailing lists and if a democratic approach was taken to rule changes (I have no idea is this is the case?) then I would vote against the change. Just my 2c since we're discussing it. Pete -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting inline. But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order so any reader could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the chain. A new reader scrolls to the bottom and reads up. What's there to catch up with if you don't first read what the person is replying to? Do you think that everybody remembers every thread. Of what value is it to see something like No, that didn't work. *before* a description of what it was that didn't work. When people reply to an email, it's their responsibility, whether they top-post or bottom-post to remove unnecessary old message and keep just what's necessary to understand the email. One of the problems with top-posting is that it makes it easier to forget to do this. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I suppose I'm one of the few people that remember the content of threads by subject and easily catch up... I'm also on my phone 99% of the time time and the way Gmail lays out emails makes top-posting beneficial to me. On Dec 29, 2012 8:57 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote: I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting inline. But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order so any reader could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the chain. A new reader scrolls to the bottom and reads up. What's there to catch up with if you don't first read what the person is replying to? Do you think that everybody remembers every thread. Of what value is it to see something like No, that didn't work. *before* a description of what it was that didn't work. When people reply to an email, it's their responsibility, whether they top-post or bottom-post to remove unnecessary old message and keep just what's necessary to understand the email. One of the problems with top-posting is that it makes it easier to forget to do this. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Users list email totals by year .
On 12/29/2012 05:20 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: 2003, 24471 2004, 48608 2005, 59116 2006, 41215 2007, 26414 2008, 20746 2009, 18304 2010, 14948 2011, 11588 2012, 7542 If you remove the top-posting thread, it may cut it in half again. j -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
