[asterisk-users] dahdi + dlink du128ta

2014-03-14 Thread binary dreamer
hello everyone,


I do have a usb ISDN modem that I would like to make it work with dahdi.
is it possible?
I am running debian 7, with dahdi 2.9, asterisk 11.8
dahdi cannot find it at the moment, unless there is something else to be
done.
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] dahdi + dlink du128ta

2014-03-14 Thread jg



I do have a usb ISDN modem that I would like to make it work with dahdi.
is it possible?
I am running debian 7, with dahdi 2.9, asterisk 11.8
dahdi cannot find it at the moment, unless there is something else to be done.

I do not think so. If your very old ISDN modem uses a Cologne Chip (HFC), then there might be a 
very small chance to make it work with mISDN.


jg

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] sorry for askingm but I can#r fund a solution [SOLVED]

2014-03-14 Thread qwer
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:18:54PM -0500, Kevin Larsen wrote:
 I neither have a 2000 in sip,conf nor I want to have one.
 2000 doesn't have an IP and I want to get rid of it, honestly.
 I'd really want to know, where this 2000 is burned in
 and how to erase it.
 sip show peers does'nt show a peer 2000 nor I have a user 2000. 
 Something that lives at 10.0.1.4 thinks it is extension 2000 and is trying 
 to register. Your problem isn't Asterisk per se, it is finding where that 
 IP address is located and what the device is to either fix its 
 configuration to what it should be or to take the rogue device off your 
 network.

I've got it!
Thanks!
At 10.0.1.4 a misconfigured linphone caused it!
:-)

ru :-)

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] sorry for askingm but I can#r fund a solution [SOLVED]

2014-03-14 Thread qwer
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:44:53AM +0200, Vadim Lungu wrote:
 This is IP is brute forcing you with peer that don't exist. So just block it.
 iptalble -A INPUT -s 10.0.1.4 -p udp -dport 5060 -j DROP

As I came to machine 10.0.1.4 I could make out a misconfigured linphone.
It was used to get connected to another asterisk before.

Thanks Vadim, greeting to Moldavia 

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] func_odbc do not read LIKE predicate

2014-03-14 Thread Vadim Lungu

  
  
Thank you, this statement is working.
On 03/14/2014 07:08 AM, hkc323 wrote:


  Vadim Lungu 

try this one .
readsql=SELECT name FROM asterisk_sippeers WHERE name LIKE '%477'; 





-- 
  

  
 Mit freundlichen Gren / Best regards
  
  Vadim Lungu
  System Engineer 
  
  

  
Tel
+49-941-569592-0
  
  
Fax
+49-941-569592-99
  
  
Mail
vadim.lu...@yopeso.com
  
  
Web
https://www.yopeso.com

  

  

 
  YOPESO s.r.l. 
  Calea Orheiului 20/1
  2059 Chisinau
  Republik Moldau
  

  
 Registergericht Chisinau
  Registernummer 1008600037623
VAT-ID
  0207159 
  Geschftsfhrer Svetlana Arnaut 
  

  

  

  

  

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Installation

2014-03-14 Thread Sujatha Ratnala (sratnala)
Hello Experts,

I was trying to follow the instructions in the Installation of AsteriskNow 32 
bit installation.
I am not able to get the graphical interface as mentioned in the wiki. Also, 
after reboot, the DNS settings does not seem to be fine. Yum update seems to be 
throwing errors.

Regards,
Sujatha
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] res-odbc sanity check reconnecting

2014-03-14 Thread Vadim Lungu

  
  
Hello everyone,
I would appreciate if someone could help me with the following
issue:
http://pastebin.com/bTskMLVw
My res_odbc.conf file look as follows:
http://pastebin.com/bhReQkXQ

-- 
  

  
 Mit freundlichen Gren / Best regards
  
  Vadim Lungu
  System Engineer 
  
  

  
Tel
+49-941-569592-0
  
  
Fax
+49-941-569592-99
  
  
Mail
vadim.lu...@yopeso.com
  
  
Web
https://www.yopeso.com

  

  

 
  YOPESO s.r.l. 
  Calea Orheiului 20/1
  2059 Chisinau
  Republik Moldau
  

  
 Registergericht Chisinau
  Registernummer 1008600037623
VAT-ID
  0207159 
  Geschftsfhrer Svetlana Arnaut 
  

  

  

  

  

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] res-odbc sanity check reconnecting

2014-03-14 Thread jg



I would appreciate if someone could help me with the following issue:
http://pastebin.com/bTskMLVw
My res_odbc.conf file look as follows:
http://pastebin.com/bhReQkXQ

Nothing to really worry about. The ODBC driver automatically reconnects to MySQL as the system 
already told you.


jg
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] sipML5, Ast12 and WebRTC: not acceptable here

2014-03-14 Thread Marco Signorini

Hi All.

I'm running some tests with the latest Asterisk SVN-branch-12-r410493M 
compiled with fresh github pjsip and srtp 1.4.2 on an i386 centOS 
machine (2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686).
As a client I'm using the sipMLP WebRTC javascript softphone running on 
Chrome 33.0.1750.146 m.


I have the softphone correctly registered on the Asterisk machine but as 
soon as I try to start a new call from the softphone, Asterisk answers 
with a 488 not acceptable here.


I'm probably missing something but I'm not able to find what and where. 
Is there someone able to point me to the right direction?

Below is my configuration. The sofpthone is registered as 1060.

Thanks in advance.
Marco Signorini.

pjsip.conf:

[transport-tls]
type=transport
protocol=tls
bind=0.0.0.0
cert_file=/etc/asterisk/sslcert.pem
method=tlsv1

[1060]
type=endpoint
transport=transport-tls
context=from-internal
use_avpf=yes
media_encryption=sdes
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
aors=1060
auth=1060

[1060]
type=auth
auth_type=userpass
password=1060
username=1060

[1060]
type=aor
max_contacts=10

[204]


http.conf:

enabled=yes
bindaddr=10.10.5.49
bindport=8088


CLI pjsip show endpoints

 Endpoint:  1060 Not in 
use0 of inf

 InAuth:  1060/1060
Aor:  1060  10
  Contact:  1060/sip:1060@10.10.5.106:54083;transport=ws;rt 
Unknown   nan

  Transport:  transport-tls tls  0  0 0.0.0.0:5061

 Endpoint:  204  Not in 
use0 of inf

 InAuth:  204/204
Aor:  2041
  Contact:  204/sip:204@10.10.5.120:5066;transport=udp 
Unknown   nan

  Transport:  transport-udp udp  0  0 0.0.0.0:5060



*CLI pjsip show transport transport-tls

Transport:  TransportId  Type  cos tos  
BindAddress

 
=

Transport:  transport-tls tls  0  0 0.0.0.0:5061

 ParameterName  : ParameterValue
 ==
 async_operations   : 1
 bind   : 0.0.0.0:5061
 ca_list_file   :
 cert_file  : /etc/asterisk/sslcert.pem
 cipher :
 cos: 0
 domain :
 external_media_address :
 external_signaling_address :
 external_signaling_port: 0
 local_net  :
 method : tlsv1
 password   :
 priv_key_file  :
 protocol   : tls
 require_client_cert: No
 tos: CS0
 verify_client  : No
 verify_server  : No


And this is the relevant SIP data exchange (with public IP hidden):

*CLI --- Received SIP request (2420 bytes) from WS:10.10.5.106:54411 ---
INVITE sip:204@10.10.5.49 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/WS 
df7jal23ls0d.invalid;branch=z9hG4bKiBw81ooU7ybSRbRqr8TOqWkMPQRdkMXo;rport

From: John Doe (101)sip:1060@10.10.5.49;tag=heMv1HvlT7DeQxPxuqcq
To: sip:204@10.10.5.49
Contact: John Doe 
(101)sip:1060@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=yes;click2call=no;transport=ws;impi=1060;ha1=0b2413e6f3c96a0517b4413a6f6ce7ae;+g.oma.sip-im;+sip.ice;language=en,fr,it

Call-ID: 636a5d79-5fda-f79a-cc4b-9ba18d060edc
CSeq: 38718 INVITE
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 1827
Max-Forwards: 70
User-Agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5

v=0
o=- 365893986064703740 2 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
s=Doubango Telecom - chrome
t=0 0
a=group:BUNDLE audio
a=msid-semantic: WMS dXVhxyOSxULu3iClZayhTeEBzH2voboiJJ28
m=audio 37874 RTP/SAVPF 111 103 104 0 8 106 105 13 126
c=IN IP4 85.0.XXX.XXX
a=rtcp:37874 IN IP4 85.0.XXX.XXX
a=candidate:296123718 1 udp 2113937151 10.10.5.106 63858 typ host 
generation 0
a=candidate:296123718 2 udp 2113937151 10.10.5.106 63858 typ host 
generation 0
a=candidate:3103388307 1 udp 1845501695 85.0.XXX.XXX 37874 typ srflx 
raddr 10.10.5.106 rport 63858 generation 0
a=candidate:3103388307 2 udp 1845501695 85.0.XXX.XXX 37874 typ srflx 
raddr 10.10.5.106 rport 63858 generation 0

a=candidate:1596293558 1 tcp 1509957375 10.10.5.106 0 typ host generation 0
a=candidate:1596293558 2 tcp 1509957375 10.10.5.106 0 typ host generation 0
a=ice-ufrag:l8AWdK4ft+AnAYGl
a=ice-pwd:3tLKvT97tf0GQr+e8v8bKncd
a=ice-options:google-ice
a=fingerprint:sha-256 
89:D4:EB:6E:9C:41:36:03:A1:44:CD:A2:08:78:CD:86:FE:EC:30:09:53:0F:77:CE:BA:8E:DE:8C:1B:A1:41:10

a=setup:actpass
a=mid:audio
a=extmap:1 urn:ietf:params:rtp-hdrext:ssrc-audio-level
a=sendrecv
a=rtcp-mux
a=crypto:0 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 
inline:dYMEPP1zoNS/W70Ln6cnBCtHXDCq6ciLZmHDHdFj
a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 
inline:Gr23SpFGDiukOKyrrfAauWssQ+3pYjD0jwkK9hOo

a=rtpmap:111 opus/48000/2
a=fmtp:111 minptime=10
a=rtpmap:103 ISAC/16000
a=rtpmap:104 ISAC/32000
a=rtpmap:0 

Re: [asterisk-users] res-odbc sanity check reconnecting

2014-03-14 Thread Vadim Lungu

  
  
I'm getting a lot of errors in CLI and this become annoying. And
when I use database from localhost, I don't have such an issue.
So I don't understand how to identify the reason of this problem. 

On 03/14/2014 01:09 PM, jg wrote:


  
  
  Nothing to really worry about. The ODBC driver automatically
  reconnects to MySQL as the system already told you

-- 
  

  
 Mit freundlichen Gren / Best regards
  
  Vadim Lungu
  System Engineer 
  
  

  
Tel
+49-941-569592-0
  
  
Fax
+49-941-569592-99
  
  
Mail
vadim.lu...@yopeso.com
  
  
Web
https://www.yopeso.com

  

  

 
  YOPESO s.r.l. 
  Calea Orheiului 20/1
  2059 Chisinau
  Republik Moldau
  

  
 Registergericht Chisinau
  Registernummer 1008600037623
VAT-ID
  0207159 
  Geschftsfhrer Svetlana Arnaut 
  

  

  

  

  

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] res-odbc sanity check reconnecting

2014-03-14 Thread jg
I'm getting a lot of errors in CLI and this become annoying. And when I use database from 
localhost, I don't have such an issue.

So I don't understand how to identify the reason of this problem.
First, please do not add your signature in the current form to your posts. It is irrelevant here 
and it takes too much time to delete them...


You did not mention that the db is running on a different host. You could publish your odbc.ini, 
but essentially you need to find out whether there is a problem with your LAN or the way you 
have configured things. Start a pcap trace and look for delays related to dns, etc...


It is likely that your problem is not related to Asterisk.

jg
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-14 Thread James B. Byrne

On Thu, March 13, 2014 15:32, Kevin Larsen wrote:
 On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
  This is an example of why I top post.   Who wrote what?


+1-1 = 0

I do not care about where people put their replies so long as I can figure out
who is answering what.  What I do not like to read is this interminable
religious dogma about the 'natural' order of writing.  This is the second or
third list this week in which this B.S. has shown up in my inbox.

In written business communication, in contrast to tech-speak customarily found
on mailing lists, ones answer always goes before any quoted context.  Not
because it has to, it is just that I have seldom, if ever, seen it done any
other way. And regular business communication with non-technical folk
comprises well over 75% of my daily written communication.

And while I understand the cultural motivation behind the dogma of bottom
posting I remain sceptical respecting its utility.  Is there any objective
evidence whatsoever that top or bottom posting makes any difference to the
reader's understanding of the message?  Does any rigorously determined data
exist to support that contention?  If not then this is simply a matter of
trying to impose a set of arbitrary cultural values cloaked in the guise of
technical superiority.


 Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,

 it all works beautifully.


 Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or nothing setting it would
 appear. Lotus Notes actually handles it better as there is a Reply option
 for normal email and a Reply With Internet-Style History that I use for
 this list. I don't have any problems following the rules of the list, but
 I am fully on the side of the Replies should go at the top group and
 would vote for a change in the rules.



And do not even start on the Chevy vs. Ford debate respecting the technical
superiority of Pine over Outlook.  GAWD... Life its too short as it is.


-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-14 Thread Ron Wheeler
If the sequence was really important, we would just move this whole list 
to a LinkedIn group and have a much better environment for following 
threads and managing the profiles of the group's members.
This is a pretty old system of managing peer support but it always takes 
a while to get legacy systems replaced.


Ron

On 14/03/2014 9:52 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:

On Thu, March 13, 2014 15:32, Kevin Larsen wrote:

On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:

This is an example of why I top post.   Who wrote what?

+1-1 = 0

I do not care about where people put their replies so long as I can figure out
who is answering what.  What I do not like to read is this interminable
religious dogma about the 'natural' order of writing.  This is the second or
third list this week in which this B.S. has shown up in my inbox.

In written business communication, in contrast to tech-speak customarily found
on mailing lists, ones answer always goes before any quoted context.  Not
because it has to, it is just that I have seldom, if ever, seen it done any
other way. And regular business communication with non-technical folk
comprises well over 75% of my daily written communication.

And while I understand the cultural motivation behind the dogma of bottom
posting I remain sceptical respecting its utility.  Is there any objective
evidence whatsoever that top or bottom posting makes any difference to the
reader's understanding of the message?  Does any rigorously determined data
exist to support that contention?  If not then this is simply a matter of
trying to impose a set of arbitrary cultural values cloaked in the guise of
technical superiority.



Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,
it all works beautifully.


Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or nothing setting it would
appear. Lotus Notes actually handles it better as there is a Reply option
for normal email and a Reply With Internet-Style History that I use for
this list. I don't have any problems following the rules of the list, but
I am fully on the side of the Replies should go at the top group and
would vote for a change in the rules.



And do not even start on the Chevy vs. Ford debate respecting the technical
superiority of Pine over Outlook.  GAWD... Life its too short as it is.





--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Working Config for Polycom VVX and Auto Answer

2014-03-14 Thread Noah Miller
Hi -

Just wondering if anyone has gotten a Polycom VVX phone to
successfully do an Auto Answer with asterisk.  I have an older
generation of Polycom phones that do this just fine, but I can't seem
to make the VVX phones work.

I tried the guide here:
http://community.polycom.com/t5/VoIP/FAQ-How-can-I-change-my-Ringtone-or-Ring-in-a-special-manner-for/td-p/5167

And I have this in my diaplan:

exten = _8XX,1,SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: info=ringAutoAnswer)
exten = _8XX,2,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1},20,tk)

But whenever I attempt a call to a matching exten, it just rings
normally for the 20 seconds I have indicated here and never answers.

I found a setting in the phone's GUI: Auto Answer SIP Calls.  When I
set this to Yes.  It will auto answer, but it auto answers ALL
calls, not just ones with the Alert-Info header set.

Any guidance is appreciated.


Thanks!
Noah

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] detail records graphic

2014-03-14 Thread binary

hello everyone.
i am looking for a way to present my CDRs in a nice way such as 
https://code.google.com/p/asterisk-cdr-viewer/ ,

but i do not want to run any databases such as mysql.
is there a software (free) that could get the asterisk's csv and present 
it in a nice way?





--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Working Config for Polycom VVX and Auto Answer

2014-03-14 Thread Noah Miller
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Noah Miller noahisaacmil...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi -

 Just wondering if anyone has gotten a Polycom VVX phone to
 successfully do an Auto Answer with asterisk.  I have an older
 generation of Polycom phones that do this just fine, but I can't seem
 to make the VVX phones work.

 I tried the guide here:
 http://community.polycom.com/t5/VoIP/FAQ-How-can-I-change-my-Ringtone-or-Ring-in-a-special-manner-for/td-p/5167

 And I have this in my diaplan:

 exten = _8XX,1,SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: info=ringAutoAnswer)
 exten = _8XX,2,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1},20,tk)

 But whenever I attempt a call to a matching exten, it just rings
 normally for the 20 seconds I have indicated here and never answers.

 I found a setting in the phone's GUI: Auto Answer SIP Calls.  When I
 set this to Yes.  It will auto answer, but it auto answers ALL
 calls, not just ones with the Alert-Info header set.

 Any guidance is appreciated.


 Thanks!
 Noah

Well, in case anyone else is interested, it's working now.  I must
have mistyped something the first time around because it is now
working with the exact settings I describe above.

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users