[asterisk-users] I'm not able to register Softphone(X-lite) in asterisk(Which is installed in EC2 Cloud).

2015-04-19 Thread akhilesh chand
Hi Folks,

I'm trying to register softphone(X-lite) but I'm not able to register
softphone whenever I'm trying to register softphone I got below error

[image: Inline image 1]

Is there any document/guide line where I will get process to register
softphone in asterisk(Which is installed in EC2 Cloud).

Regards
Akhilesh
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] I'm not able to install asterisk in AWS cloud

2015-04-19 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:43:28PM +0530, ajahar mohd wrote:
 Hi Akhilesh,
 
 Here is another fix,
 
 getting the error, that: make[1]: *** No rule to make target
 `../main/modules.link’, needed by `asterisk’. Stop. make: *** [main] Error
 2 when compile asterisk
 
 To get around this, just delete following line in file makeopts.embed_rules
 
 EMBED_LDSCRIPTS+=../main/modules.link
 
 Source: http://showmyroutes.com/wordpress/?p=500

Two conclusions:

1. Why would you use module embedding? I don't think this gives you any
benefits on a system with a proper linker.

2. When you ask a question about a failed build, please include
something closer to a full build log. Specifically, a few more lines of
context before the actual error.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended changes to the binary packaging system

2015-04-19 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 08:22:44AM -0400, Aaron Hunter wrote:
 I think the way Digium has structured the binary packages could use a major
 change. I rely on the binary packages rather than compiling by source
 because my systems are managed by an automated CM tool (I use Ansible but
 those using Chef or Puppet will face the same problems) and for security
 reasons. I use the CentOS packages.

If you don't like the existing packages, build your own packages.

 
 Some issues with the current package structure are:
 - It installs unneeded repositories. The asterisknow package install 12
 repositories, of which I use at most 4 (2 asterisk and 2 digium)
 - It changes which repositories are enabled and disabled.
 - It overwrites .repo files
 - Packages are not signed
 - It overwrites /etc/issue which is a security violation (albeit a minor
 one).
 - It installs packages I don't need such as the dahdi ones.( Maybe some of
 these are needed for a minimal system, I could be wrong.)

Unless something changed recently, there's a separate package
asterisk-dahdi. Don't install it if you don't want it.

 - It requires the --enablerepo=x in the yum command line
 
 The conflict between the Digium repositories and epel is a problem for me
 as well but since I can't determine what the actual cause is (probably
 package naming issues) I won't include it in my list.

Do include an example output of a conflict so we can have an idea of the
potential problem.

 
 These problems break the automated management of my system and cause
 security concerns.
 
 Instead of the complex current system I would recommend something more
 simple:
 - Remove asterisknow or at least make it optional
 - Allow users to install a minimally functioning asterisk from the
 asterisk-x and asterisk-current repos only. Any additional modules needed
 should be installed separately, including those from the commercial digium
 repositories.
 - Sign the packages and enable gpgcheck
 - Don't overwrite system files or current .repo files

What's the problem?

Have you considered providing your own asterisk.conf with an alternative
astetcdir?

 
 In other words: install asterisk .repo files, yum install asterisk, install
 config files, done.

yum install asterisk means it installs a pre-defined set of modules.
But you preffered to have a more modular packaging.

 
 If others on this list also use automated tools to manage their systems I'd
 like to hear how you handle the installation and maintenance of asterisk.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users