Re: [asterisk-users] trouble removing + sign

2019-02-13 Thread sean darcy
On 2/13/19 6:22 PM, Dovid Bender wrote: Try == in your gotoif (instead of =) Regards, Dovid   Original Message From: seandar...@gmail.com Sent: February 14, 2019 01:14 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Reply-to: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users]

Re: [asterisk-users] trouble removing + sign

2019-02-13 Thread Dovid Bender
Try == in your gotoif (instead of =) Regards, Dovid   Original Message   From: seandar...@gmail.com Sent: February 14, 2019 01:14 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Reply-to: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] trouble removing + sign I'm using

[asterisk-users] trouble removing + sign

2019-02-13 Thread sean darcy
I'm using BLACKLIST() to check numbers, which does not like leading + signs. I want to test if there is a plus sign, and then remove it. I tried: ; strip leading plus sign same => n, Verbose( callerid 0:1 is ${CALLERID(num):0:1} ) same => n,ExecIf($["${CALLERID(num):0:1}" =

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium T1 gateway caller ID issues

2019-02-13 Thread Nick Olsen
You might confirm you're getting CallerID from the PRI in the call setup. You can do a debug capture session on the G100 and get this info. If you need CallerID preserved from the PRI (Like the served PBX sends multiple calling numbers based on end user station) then you'll likely need to fix

[asterisk-users] Digium T1 gateway caller ID issues

2019-02-13 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
Hi, We recently dumped a Xorcom box that was no end of trouble and replaced with a Digium G100.  PRI came right up, and we have been using it fairly flawlessly for several months now, with one caveat.  Calls that arrive from the PRI are sent to the asterisk instance (13.23.1, chan_sip), then