[asterisk-users] Realtime Queue - changing strategy to linear needs Asterisk restart

2011-11-07 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi group,

We have realtime queue architecture on asterisk 1.8.7.0
I noticed that when we change strategy from any other to 'linear' it
requires Asterisk restart take the change in effect.
I have one realtime queue '1' with strategy set to 'ringall' and I change
its strategy to 'linear'. Now when check on Asterisk CLI it shows me
warning given below.

demo*CLI queue show 1
1 has 0 calls (max 500) in 'ringall' strategy (0s holdtime, 0s talktime),
W:1, C:0, A:0, SL:0.0% within 100s
No Members
No Callers

[Nov 8 12:10:18] WARNING[4887]: app_queue.c:2034 queue_set_param: Changing
to the linear strategy currently requires asterisk to be restarted.
[Nov 8 12:10:18] WARNING[4887]: app_queue.c:2034 queue_set_param: Changing
to the linear strategy currently requires asterisk to be restarted.


This behaviour doesn't happen when strategy changed to other than 'linear'.
So why is Asterisk restart needed for this change?

TIA,
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Detecting Special Information Tone in Asterisk

2011-10-19 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi,
Has anybody any idea about detecting Special Information Tone(SIT)
when making utbound calls?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_information_tone
I googled for detecting SIT in Asterisk but couldn't find useful results.

Thanks,
--Sam

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.7.0- Incorrect information in Queue events-AMI

2011-10-13 Thread Asterisk Man
Opened the issue: ASTERISK-18707

On 10/12/11, Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com wrote:
 Just a guess at this point, but I'd say because you had two agents
 registered to the queue, but only one was available?  If you dynamically
 logout the Unavailable agent, it should not show up in the QueueStatus
 response, however if you dynamically log him in then just shut off the
 phone, he'll still be listed as a member even if unavailable.

 Apparently, QueueSummary takes the available status into consideration when
 listing the number of logged in agents. You may be able to make a case that
 this behavior is inconsistent, and thus, a bug, but I could see it going
 either way.

 If you open a ticket on the issue, respond here with the issue id, I'd like
 to track it.

 Thanks,
 --Warren Selby, dCAP

 On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:39 PM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks Warren,
 I have been using X-lite for member and the system from where it is
 running was down at that time.
 My concern was, if 'Queuestatus' shows two members as logged in for the
 Queue then why not 'Queuesummary'?

 Any other pointer?
 --AM

 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com
 wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 snip

 Event: QueueMember
 Queue: 1
 Name: 3
 Location: SIP/
 Membership: dynamic
 Penalty: 2
 CallsTaken: 0
 LastCall: 0
 Status: 5
 Paused: 0

 I would first troubleshoot why this Queue Member is showing up as Status:
 5 (Unavailable).

 --
 Thanks,
 --Warren Selby, dCAP
 http://www.SelbyTech.com


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.7.0- Incorrect information in Queue events-AMI

2011-10-11 Thread Asterisk Man
Thanks Warren,
I have been using X-lite for member and the system from where it is running
was down at that time.
My concern was, if 'Queuestatus' shows two members as logged in for the
Queue then why not 'Queuesummary'?

Any other pointer?
--AM

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Asterisk Man 
 theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 snip


 Event: QueueMember
 Queue: 1
 Name: 3
 Location: SIP/
 Membership: dynamic
 Penalty: 2
 CallsTaken: 0
 LastCall: 0
 Status: 5
 Paused: 0


 I would first troubleshoot why this Queue Member is showing up as Status: 5
 (Unavailable).

 --
 Thanks,
 --Warren Selby, dCAP
 http://www.SelbyTech.com http://www.selbytech.com


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.7.0- Incorrect information in Queue events-AMI

2011-10-10 Thread Asterisk Man
Friends,
I was just playing with couple of manager actions for Queue statistics on
Asterisk 1.8.7.0 and found some inconsistency in information(I may be wrong
somewhere interpreting the information!).
Let me paste the outputs of my test for your reference.
=
[1] QueueStatus
action: queuestatus
queue: 1

Response: Success
Message: Queue status will follow

Event: QueueParams
Queue: 1
Max: 0
Strategy: ringall
Calls: 0
Holdtime: 2
TalkTime: 26
Completed: 20
Abandoned: 3
ServiceLevel: 0
ServicelevelPerf: 0.0
Weight: 0

Event: QueueMember
Queue: 1
Name: 2
Location: SIP/1112
Membership: dynamic
Penalty: 1
CallsTaken: 16
LastCall: 1318251310
Status: 1
Paused: 0

Event: QueueMember
Queue: 1
Name: 3
Location: SIP/
Membership: dynamic
Penalty: 2
CallsTaken: 0
LastCall: 0
Status: 5
Paused: 0

Event: QueueStatusComplete
---
[2]QueueSummary
action: queuesummary
queue: 1

Response: Success
Message: Queue summary will follow

Event: QueueSummary
Queue: 1
LoggedIn: 1
Available: 1
Callers: 0
HoldTime: 2
TalkTime: 26
LongestHoldTime: 0

Event: QueueSummaryComplete
---
[3]CLI: Queue Show

10:35:00DEMO* queue show 1
1 has 0 calls (max unlimited) in 'ringall' strategy (2s holdtime, 26s
talktime), W:0, C:20, A:3, SL:0.0% within 0s
Members:
2 (SIP/1112) with penalty 1 (dynamic) (Not in use) has taken 16 calls (last
was 58190 secs ago)
3 (SIP/) with penalty 2 (dynamic) (Unavailable) has taken no calls yet
No Callers
=

You can see,
=Response for action 'Queuestatus' shows 2 members logged in(Event:
QueueMember) for Queue 1, whereas action 'Queuesummary' shows just 1(Event:
QueueSummary Queue: 1 LoggedIn: 1 ...).

Should I open the bug or am I missing something?
Thanks,
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw)

2011-06-28 Thread Asterisk Man
Asterisk 1.8.3.2

I have been getting this warning constantly on CLI in a call scenario where
I use local channels to connect SIP with PSTN.
I use callfile and local channel to first call a PSTN number and if
answered, use local channel to call SIP phone with music on hold enabled in
Dial string.
If I call PSTN from SIP directly or vice versa I don't see this warning
coming.
On SIP I have allowed only one codec(alaw).

[Jun 28 15:05:00] WARNING[31016] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type
slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x8 (alaw)/0x8 (alaw)


I also tried to yes/no option transcode_via_sln in asterisk.conf without any
success.
Any idea?
Thanks,
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw)

2011-06-28 Thread Asterisk Man
Thanks for the response.
I have disallow=all and allow=alaw in sip.conf for my SIP user.
Any other idea?
--AM

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Fellipe Paes fellipe...@hotmail.comwrote:

  Hello!

 In your sip.conf use alaw as your first codec option and see what happens.
 Best regards,

 Fellipe Paes

 --
 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:29:11 +0530
 From: theasterisk...@gmail.com
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native
 formats is 0x8 (alaw)



 Asterisk 1.8.3.2

 I have been getting this warning constantly on CLI in a call scenario where
 I use local channels to connect SIP with PSTN.
 I use callfile and local channel to first call a PSTN number and if
 answered, use local channel to call SIP phone with music on hold enabled in
 Dial string.
 If I call PSTN from SIP directly or vice versa I don't see this warning
 coming.
 On SIP I have allowed only one codec(alaw).

 [Jun 28 15:05:00] WARNING[31016] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type
 slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x8 (alaw)/0x8 (alaw)


 I also tried to yes/no option transcode_via_sln in asterisk.conf without
 any success.
 Any idea?
 Thanks,
 --AM

 -- _ --
 Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
 Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
 http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE
 or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] [Asterisk 1.8.3.2] Mixmonitor not working on member(calling part) channel of Queue.

2011-05-05 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi,

I have a simple Queue(named 1) and one Member(SIP/1119) logged into it. Now
when a caller is placed into Queue and gets connected with Member, I want to
record the call. It does record the call when I use MixMonitor() before
placing the caller into Queue, but not when MixMonitor() is used in macro
which is called upon Member answering the call.

Following is my dialplan...

[mixmonitortest]
exten = 1212,1,Noop(## Test mixmonitor with Queue ##)
same = n,MixMonitor(testmixmonitorA.wav,W(4))
same = n,Queue(1,ct,,,50,,agntanserd)


[macro-agntanserd]
exten = s,1,Noop(## Agent answered the call. Record the call
##)
same = n,MixMonitor(testmixmonitorB.wav,W(4))

I checked default path for recordings (/var/spool/asterisk/monitor) and it
just shows a single recording for mixmonitor used before Queue()...

[root@testmachine monitor]# ls
testmixmonitorA.wav

Following is the Asterisk CLI output...

[May  5 17:26:34] -- Executing [1212@mixmonitortest:1]
NoOp(SIP/31-001b, ## Test mixmonitor with Queue ##)
in new stack
[May  5 17:26:34] -- Executing [1212@mixmonitortest:2]
MixMonitor(SIP/31-001b, testmixmonitorA.wav,W(4)) in new stack
[May  5 17:26:34] -- Executing [1212@mixmonitortest:3]
Queue(SIP/31-001b, 1,ct,,,50,,agntanserd) in new stack
[May  5 17:26:34]   == Begin MixMonitor Recording SIP/31-001b
[May  5 17:26:34] -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on
SIP/31-001b
[May  5 17:26:34] WARNING[21215]: translate.c:162 framein: no samples for
ulawtolin
[May  5 17:26:34]   == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
[May  5 17:26:34] -- SIP/1119-001c is ringing
[May  5 17:26:40] -- SIP/1119-001c answered SIP/31-001b
[May  5 17:26:40] -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/31-001b
[May  5 17:26:40] -- Executing [s@macro-agntanserd:1]
NoOp(SIP/1119-001c, ## Agent answered the call. Record the
call ##) in new stack
[May  5 17:26:40] -- Executing [s@macro-agntanserd:2]
MixMonitor(SIP/1119-001c, testmixmonitorB.wav,W(4)) in new stack
[May  5 17:26:40]   == Begin MixMonitor Recording SIP/1119-001c
[May  5 17:26:46]   == End MixMonitor Recording SIP/1119-001c
[May  5 17:26:46]   == MixMonitor close filestream
[May  5 17:26:46]   == End MixMonitor Recording SIP/31-001b


Any idead why is Asterisk not creating recording for Mixmonitor()
application used in macro? Has anybody faced similar issue, or is a bug?

Asterisk version- 1.8.3.2
I couldn't get chance to test on other Asterisk versions.

Thanks in advance.
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk 1.8.3.2] Mixmonitor not working on member(calling part) channel of Queue.

2011-05-05 Thread Asterisk Man
Thank you very much for your response and suggestion.
I raised the question because in my project I don't want to record all the
Queue

calls. I just want to record calls connected with some specific members.

--AM

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Carlos Chavez cur...@telecomabmex.comwrote:

 On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:16 +0530, Asterisk Man wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I have a simple Queue(named 1) and one Member(SIP/1119) logged into
  it. Now when a caller is placed into Queue and gets connected with
  Member, I want to record the call. It does record the call when I use
  MixMonitor() before placing the caller into Queue, but not when
  MixMonitor() is used in macro which is called upon Member answering
  the call.
 
  Following is my dialplan...
 
  [mixmonitortest]
  exten = 1212,1,Noop(## Test mixmonitor with Queue ##)
  same = n,MixMonitor(testmixmonitorA.wav,W(4))
  same = n,Queue(1,ct,,,50,,agntanserd)
 
 
  [macro-agntanserd]
  exten = s,1,Noop(## Agent answered the call. Record the call
  ##)
  same = n,MixMonitor(testmixmonitorB.wav,W(4))
 
  I checked default path for recordings (/var/spool/asterisk/monitor)
  and it just shows a single recording for mixmonitor used before
  Queue()...
 
  [root@testmachine monitor]# ls
  testmixmonitorA.wav
 
  Following is the Asterisk CLI output...
 
  [May  5 17:26:34] -- Executing [1212@mixmonitortest:1]
  NoOp(SIP/31-001b, ## Test mixmonitor with Queue
  ##) in new stack
  [May  5 17:26:34] -- Executing [1212@mixmonitortest:2]
  MixMonitor(SIP/31-001b, testmixmonitorA.wav,W(4)) in new stack
  [May  5 17:26:34] -- Executing [1212@mixmonitortest:3]
  Queue(SIP/31-001b, 1,ct,,,50,,agntanserd) in new stack
  [May  5 17:26:34]   == Begin MixMonitor Recording SIP/31-001b
  [May  5 17:26:34] -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on
  SIP/31-001b
  [May  5 17:26:34] WARNING[21215]: translate.c:162 framein: no samples
  for ulawtolin
  [May  5 17:26:34]   == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
  [May  5 17:26:34] -- SIP/1119-001c is ringing
  [May  5 17:26:40] -- SIP/1119-001c answered SIP/31-001b
  [May  5 17:26:40] -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/31-001b
  [May  5 17:26:40] -- Executing [s@macro-agntanserd:1]
  NoOp(SIP/1119-001c, ## Agent answered the call. Record
  the call ##) in new stack
  [May  5 17:26:40] -- Executing [s@macro-agntanserd:2]
  MixMonitor(SIP/1119-001c, testmixmonitorB.wav,W(4)) in new
  stack
  [May  5 17:26:40]   == Begin MixMonitor Recording SIP/1119-001c
  [May  5 17:26:46]   == End MixMonitor Recording SIP/1119-001c
  [May  5 17:26:46]   == MixMonitor close filestream
  [May  5 17:26:46]   == End MixMonitor Recording SIP/31-001b
 
 
  Any idead why is Asterisk not creating recording for Mixmonitor()
  application used in macro? Has anybody faced similar issue, or is a
  bug?
 
  Asterisk version- 1.8.3.2
  I couldn't get chance to test on other Asterisk versions.
 
 What is wrong with the native Queue recording?  Check queues.conf
 and
 make sure you have:

 monitor-type = MixMonitor
 monitor-format = gsm|wav|wav49

This will automatically record calls when the agent answers the
 call.

 --
 Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V.
 Carlos Chávez Prats
 Director de Tecnología
 +52-55-91169161 ext 2001

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk 1.8.3.2] Mixmonitor not working on member(calling part) channel of Queue.

2011-05-05 Thread Asterisk Man
Further,
Before I start working on full project, I wanted to test the functionalities
to be implemented. So I wrote a small test dialplan to check whether I can
record a Queue call in Macro which gets executed on Member answer. My actual
macro would be like this...

[macro-agntanserd]
exten = s,1,Noop(## Agent answered the call. Record the call
##)
;-- Check whether to record a call or not --;
same =
n,Set(ARRAY(RECORDCALL,ONDEMAND)=${ODBC_CHECK_CALL_RECORDING(${MEMBERNAME})})
same = n,ExecIf($[${RECORDCALL} =
1]?MixMonitor(testmixmonitorB.wav,W(4)):Noop())

And I have a realtime Queue in which members are added/removed dynamically.

Any help or pointer will be appreciated.
Thanks,
--AM

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thank you very much for your response and suggestion.
 I raised the question because in my project I don't want to record all the
 Queue

 calls. I just want to record calls connected with some specific members.

 --AM



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] How does wrandom strategy works with Queue?

2011-04-26 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi,

wrandom strategy for Queue says...rings random interface, but uses the
member's penalty as a weight  when calculating their metric. So a member
with penalty 0 will have a metric somewhere between 0 and 1000, and a member
with penalty 1 will have a metric between 0 and 2000, and a member with
penalty 2 will have a metric between 0 and 3000. Please note, if using this
strategy, the member penalty is not the same as when using other queue
strategies. It is ONLY used as a weight for calculating metric.

Does it mean if a member with lower penalty is available, Queue will always
send the call to that member?
what if that member ignores the call(I am using X-lite as a member phone)?
Should Queue ringback the same member or ring somebody else who has higher
penalty and available?

I tried this on Asterisk 1.8.0 and found different behaviors each time.
First case it tried ringing the same lower penalty member no matter call was
ignored or not. In another case it rang second member when lower penalty
member ignored the call.

Moreover,How does that matric get calculated and affect the behavior of
ringing the member?

Thanking you in advance...

--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] How does wrandom strategy works with Queue?

2011-04-26 Thread Asterisk Man
Thanks Jaron,
I understood the point from your explanation.
What should I do if I always want to ring a particular Queue member first
whenever he is available?

Yes, I can dial that member first before sending the call to Queue and
achieve the result but just wanted to know views from others.

Regards,
--AM

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Jeroen Eeuwes jeroeneeu...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi AM,

  I tried this on Asterisk 1.8.0 and found different behaviors each time.

 Isn't that part of the definition of random? If Asterisk would
 behave the same each time it wouldn't be random but predictable, I
 would say.

 AFAIK the metric just means that you get a higher or lower chance of
 being selected instead of being completely random. So instead of
 picking between person A or B choices it will choose between -let's
 say- 10 marbles. 3 of them are white and 7 of them are black. So black
 gets a higher chance of being selected. But it does not mean a white
 marble won't be selected.

 Best regards,
 Jeroen Eeuwes

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Queue(): How to know Estimated wait time for caller in advance

2011-04-12 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi,

Can we know the estimated wait time for a caller before sending him in a
Queue?
Asterisk 1.8

Thanks,

--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 Dimensioning.

2011-03-31 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi Group,

Is there any information available for Asterisk 1.8 dimensioning? I googled
but couldn't find helpful data for 1.8.

I am trying to figure out hardware configuration for following features
implemented in Asterisk 1.8?

(1)100 SIP clients.
(2)ACD (Around 15 realtime queues)
(3)Call recording for all SIP clients.
(4)4 port PRI (E1). There would be around 100 concurrent calls.
(DAHDI2SIP,SIP2SIP,SIP2DAHDI)
(5)IVR
(6)Around 50 Mysql queries per call (through ODBC). (Remote Database)
(7)MOH


I can provide further information if missing something.

Thanking you in advance.
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Queue(): how to Perform operations at the time of call sent to Queue member but not answered.

2011-03-28 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi Group,

In Queue application, we have AGI,macro and gosub parameters that allow us
to perform some operations when Queue member gets connected with caller. But
it seems that right now there is no such mechanism (except CEL,AMI) for
situation where we want some operations to be performed when call is sent to
Queue Member but not answered yet (i.e. Queue Member interface is in ringing
state).

I know monitoring Channel events we can do this, but I wanted something in
dialplan itself to get it done.

Probably I will not be the only person asking for this future in Asterisk.

PLease have your thoughts on this.

Thanking you.
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Status of Queue Members

2011-03-18 Thread Asterisk Man
Probably this will help you...
http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9780596517342/ch13.html#ACD_id288901
Check the section 'Controlling when to join and leave a queue'.

--AM

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Dan Journo 
d...@keshercommunications.comwrote:

 Hi,



 I'm trying to work out an issue with call queues.



 I need the calls that are in a queue to be kicked out if all members are
 unavailable (for example if all SIP members are having network problems).



 I tried leavewhenempty = yes but that only seems works when all queue
 members specifically log out of a queue.



 I've looked at autopause, but we need it to automatically un-pause once it
 comes back online.



 Any idea how I can do this? Preferably without using the AMI or AGI
 scripts, but if that's the only way, then i'll have to use that.



 Thanks

 Dan



 Kesher Communications (UK)

 Business Phone Systems http://www.keshercommunications.com/ | Hosted 
 PBXhttp://www.keshercommunications.com/hostedpbx.html



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg call generated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi Group,

I have following case scenario.

Through call file, Asterisk makes a call to  SIP extension. When Extension
answers the call, Asterisk reads customer numbers (set in callfile) and
calls them one by one untill one of the customers answeres the call. Here
customer and SIP extension gets patched and talk to each other.

Now if outgoing call is answered by Answering machine,I don't want asterisk
to patch it up with SIP extension. Please suggest me how this can be
achieved.

Thanking you in advance.
--AM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Asterisk Man
Thanks buddy,
But I think, AMD helps when I call customer first and then SIP extension.
Any other suggestion!

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:

   --

 *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
 asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Asterisk Man
 *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:13 AM
 *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg
 callgenerated by a call file.



 Hi Group,

 I have following case scenario.

 Through call file, Asterisk makes a call to  SIP extension. When Extension
 answers the call, Asterisk reads customer numbers (set in callfile) and
 calls them one by one untill one of the customers answeres the call. Here
 customer and SIP extension gets patched and talk to each other.

 Now if outgoing call is answered by Answering machine,I don't want asterisk
 to patch it up with SIP extension. Please suggest me how this can be
 achieved.

 Thanking you in advance.
 --AM



 May or may not help – google for “Asterisk AMD”

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

2011-03-17 Thread Asterisk Man
This seems better. I will give it a try.
Thanks federico.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:10 PM, federico cabiddu 
federico.cabi...@gmail.com wrote:

 AMD is used mainly in scenarios like yours where an agent (the SIP
 extension) is called, then an outbound call is generated and finally
 the two legs are bridged. In your case you could call the Dial cmd
 using the M option. The argument of M can be a macro like this simple
 one:

 exten = s,1,Background(short_silence)
 exten = s,n,AMD()
 exten = s,n,GotoIf($[${AMDSTATUS}=MACHINE]?mach:humn)
 exten = s,n(humn),MacroExit
 exten = s,n(mach),Set(MACRO_RESULT=CONTINUE)

 So if an human is detected the legs will be bridged, if not the called
 party will be hangup and the next number will be called.
 The problem is, like previously said, the accuracy of the detection...

 Best regards,

 Federico

 2011/3/17 Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.com:
  Thanks buddy,
  But I think, AMD helps when I call customer first and then SIP extension.
  Any other suggestion!
 
  On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com
 wrote:
 
  
 
  From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
  [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk
 Man
  Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:13 AM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg
  callgenerated by a call file.
 
 
 
  Hi Group,
 
  I have following case scenario.
 
  Through call file, Asterisk makes a call to  SIP extension. When
 Extension
  answers the call, Asterisk reads customer numbers (set in callfile) and
  calls them one by one untill one of the customers answeres the call.
 Here
  customer and SIP extension gets patched and talk to each other.
 
  Now if outgoing call is answered by Answering machine,I don't want
  asterisk to patch it up with SIP extension. Please suggest me how this
 can
  be achieved.
 
  Thanking you in advance.
  --AM
 
 
 
  May or may not help – google for “Asterisk AMD”
 
  --
  _
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
  New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  --
  _
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
  New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] How to know Caller's last position in Queue?

2011-02-16 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi group,
I have a simple call center scenario set up on Asterisk. Customer calls the
DID and gets placed in Queue waiting for their turn to talk to the available
agent.
Sometimes Customer hangs up in between and in this case I want to get the
last position of customer in Queue.
I know there is a variable called ${QEORIGINALPOS} that gives us original
position of caller in Queue, but there doesn't seem to have something
similar for exit position.
Am I missing something?

Thanks,

--AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] How to know Caller's last position in Queue?

2011-02-16 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi Hanif,
 I indeed use 1.8 .0 but couldn't find the channel variable for caller's
last position in queue  anywhere in documentation.
Would you please let me know the channel variable name?

Thanking you.

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Faisal Hanif fai...@vopium.com wrote:

 If you use Asterisk 1.8.x you can have this in channel vars and can collect
 and add to DB or file on h extension.



 *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
 asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Asterisk Man
 *Sent:* Wednesday, February 16, 2011 3:06 PM
 *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 *Subject:* [asterisk-users] How to know Caller's last position in Queue?



 Hi group,
 I have a simple call center scenario set up on Asterisk. Customer calls the
 DID and gets placed in Queue waiting for their turn to talk to the available
 agent.
 Sometimes Customer hangs up in between and in this case I want to get the
 last position of customer in Queue.
 I know there is a variable called ${QEORIGINALPOS} that gives us original
 position of caller in Queue, but there doesn't seem to have something
 similar for exit position.
 Am I missing something?

 Thanks,

 --AsteriskMan

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Member penalty and Queue strategies

2011-01-10 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi Group,
Does Queue application take member penalty into account when strategy is
other than wrandom?
If yes, What difference does it make in case of linear and rrmemory
strategies?

Thanking you,
AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Call forwrading but call transfer back

2011-01-05 Thread Asterisk Man
Do you forward the call from SIP phone or Asterisk dialplan.
If it is from SIP Phone, above solution will not work. Infact any
solution will not work except your softphone supports call forwarding
based on some filter parameters.

--AsteriskMan

On 1/5/11, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
   _

 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of satish patel
 Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:36 AM
 To: asterisk-users
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Call forwrading but call transfer back



 Hi All,

 I have weird requirement for call forwarding. I have forward all call from
 A to B extension because A is very busy and sometime not available so B is
 taking care of all forwarding call from A. but in some case B need to
 transfer call to A and in this case call coming back to B again because of
 forwarding enabled.  How to get rid on this condition ? How could B can
 transfer call to A ?

 Thanks,
 Satish



 This is a job for ex-girlfriend logic.  Set up your dialplan like this
 (A=1001, B=1002)



 Exten = 1001,verbose(extension A-1001 handling)

 Exten = 1001,n,dial(SIP/1002)

 Exten  = 1001/1002,n,dial(SIP/1001)



 If you dial 1001 from anywhere except 1002, you get sent to 1002.  If you
 dial 1001 from 1002, you get sent to 1001.





--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Member relationship and AstDB

2010-12-29 Thread Asterisk Man
Is my explanation of query not so clear???
I may go wrong while asking something, then I should be guided to put it in
a different way!

This is with due respect to all of you guys.

As this is Asterisk Users group, anybody, trying to learn Asterisk, may ask
even a silly

question. And (s)he should expect atleast a single reply from digium guys if
not from others!

I am very well aware of the 'Openess nature' of Asterisk Project, but if we
want to compete

with other PBXs (Read proprietary PBXs; as per my study there doesn't seem
any other

opensource PBX project coming near to Asterisk... atleast for the moment),
we should be little

bit more responsive.

Regards,

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 I need clarification on couple of issues of Realtime Queue.

 It seems that when Agents(Memebers) are added using AddQueueMember,
 Asterisk puts this Queue-Member relationship information  into AstDB, So
 that on asterisk restart this can be preserved.

 My question is, why does asterisk not store call information for Queue
 (holdtime, talktime, W, C, A, SL%) in AstDB, So that it can also be retained
 on restart?

 Though Queue-Member relationship information is stored in AstDB, it still
 forgets number of calls taken by member on instance of asterisk restart.

  Thanking you,

 -AsteriskMan

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Queue Member relationship and AstDB

2010-12-27 Thread Asterisk Man
I need clarification on couple of issues of Realtime Queue.

It seems that when Agents(Memebers) are added using AddQueueMember, Asterisk
puts this Queue-Member relationship information  into AstDB, So that on
asterisk restart this can be preserved.

My question is, why does asterisk not store call information for Queue
(holdtime, talktime, W, C, A, SL%) in AstDB, So that it can also be retained
on restart?

Though Queue-Member relationship information is stored in AstDB, it still
forgets number of calls taken by member on instance of asterisk restart.

 Thanking you,

-AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Moving asterisk from one network to another.

2010-12-26 Thread Asterisk Man
A ton of thanks for useful information.
Quite informative to keep in mind for somebody like me who is still learner!

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Sebastian s...@open-t.co.uk wrote:

 Hi,


 On 12/24/2010 12:37 PM, Asterisk Man wrote:

 Friends,

 Do we need to change any Asterisk configuration files (Or any file
 related to Asterisk for that matter) when we put Asterisk box from one
 network to another?


 I guess it really depends on your setup. If you have SIP trunks for
 example, they might contain the IP's of external and internal networks in
 the config files. Your firewall (if you have one) might contain IP's and
 network masks. It depends on how the box was originally setup.

 Sebastian


 It is assumed that DB is on the same box.

 Asterisk box has got Asterisk running in it with no issues.

 Probably, it should not complain.

 I tried to check for IP address in Asterisk files (using ‘find . | xargs
 grep 192.168.X.XX –sl’), but it seems that Asterisk does not store
 specific IP in file(s).

 Your thoughts on this if I m missing something.

 -AsteriskMan



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Moving asterisk from one network to another.

2010-12-24 Thread Asterisk Man
Friends,



Do we need to change any Asterisk configuration files (Or any file related
to Asterisk for that matter) when we put Asterisk box from one network to
another?

It is assumed that DB is on the same box.

Asterisk box has got Asterisk running in it with no issues.

Probably, it should not complain.

I tried to check for IP address in Asterisk files (using ‘find . | xargs
grep 192.168.X.XX –sl’), but it seems that Asterisk does not store specific
IP in file(s).



Your thoughts on this if I m missing something.



-AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Moving asterisk from one network to another.

2010-12-24 Thread Asterisk Man
Friends,



Do we need to change any Asterisk configuration files (Or any file related
to Asterisk for that matter) when we put Asterisk box from one network to
another?

It is assumed that DB is on the same box.

Asterisk box has got Asterisk running in it with no issues.

Probably, it should not complain.

I tried to check for IP address in Asterisk files (using ‘find . | xargs
grep 192.168.X.XX –sl’), but it seems that Asterisk does not store specific
IP in file(s).



Your thoughts on this if I m missing something.



-AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass DTMF to IVR gateway through SIP phone conferencing.

2010-12-21 Thread Asterisk Man
Christian,
Thanks for your response.
In my case, I was asked to do it through SIP phone 3 way call functionality
and not the Asterisk Meetme application.
I wanted to know if any one had done something similar in past or not.
I am short of PRI in my test environment and hence I can't test it
practically.
Well, I 'll try to implement it using Meetme.

Regards,

AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass DTMF to IVR gateway through SIP phone conferencing.

2010-12-20 Thread Asterisk Man
Will someone help/direct me find a way to implement this?
Or you can suggest some other method.

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi friends,

 I want to implement following scenario using Asterisk. Please suggest me
 whether it is possible  or

 not.

 This is bit off Asterisk and more on SIP side.

 An Asterisk box with one Station(SIP channel) and PRI.

 Agent dials a PSTN number of customer from station through Asterisk PRI.
 Agent gets connected with

 customer. Agent puts customer on hold. Agent dials another PSTN number
 which is of IVR gateway.

 Agent now makes conference(Station facility)  with customer and IVR
 gateway. Gateway plays an IVR

 asking customer to enter his customer id number.

 My question is, will DTMF get forwarded to IVR gateway?

 I am asked to implement this and not having PRI for the moment in my
 Asterisk box.

 Thanking you in advance.

 -AsteriskMan

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Contradiction between 2 AMI actions QueueSummary and Queuestatus

2010-12-19 Thread Asterisk Man
Let me explain this with some more details.
I have 2 members logged into Queue 'retailBanking' using AddQueueMember
application on 2 different softphones.
The softphones from which these 2 members were added, later unregistered
from Asterisk.

I then fired below mentioned AMI actions and observed the output.
'QueueSummary' didn't show any member logged into 'retailBanking', where as
'Queuestatus' did show members with 'QueueMember' event.


Is this bug or intended behavior?
Should I submit a bug report?

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 Asterisk Version: 1.8.0
 Members are added through AddQueueMember in realtime Queues


 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 Guys,
 Why is such contradiction between 2 AMI actions QueueSummary and
 Queuestatus?
 Look at LoggedIn of QueueSummary and Event: QueueMember.
 Also LongestHoldTime of QueueSummary does not give correct value.

 -

 Action: QueueSummary
 Queue: retailBanking

 Response: Success
 Message: Queue summary will follow

 Event: QueueSummary
 Queue: retailBanking
 LoggedIn: 0
 Available: 0
 Callers: 0
 HoldTime: 22
 TalkTime: 231
 LongestHoldTime: 0

 Event: QueueSummaryComplete
 -
 Action: Queuestatus
 Queue: retailBanking

 Response: Success
 Message: Queue status will follow

 Event: QueueParams
 Queue: retailBanking
 Max: 0
 Strategy: rrmemory
 Calls: 0
 Holdtime: 22
 TalkTime: 231
 Completed: 5
 Abandoned: 4
 ServiceLevel: 0
 ServicelevelPerf: 0.0
 Weight: 0

 Event: QueueMember
 Queue: retailBanking
 Name: agent2
 Location: SIP/1110
 Membership: dynamic
 Penalty: 0
 CallsTaken: 1
 LastCall: 1292570332
 Status: 5
 Paused: 0

 Event: QueueMember
 Queue: retailBanking
 Name: agent1
 Location: SIP/
 Membership: dynamic
 Penalty: 0
 CallsTaken: 3
 LastCall: 1292581231
 Status: 5
 Paused: 0

 Event: QueueStatusComplete
 -

 --AsteriskMan



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Pass DTMF to IVR gateway through SIP phone conferencing.

2010-12-17 Thread Asterisk Man
Hi friends,

I want to implement following scenario using Asterisk. Please suggest me
whether it is possible  or

not.

This is bit off Asterisk and more on SIP side.

An Asterisk box with one Station(SIP channel) and PRI.

Agent dials a PSTN number of customer from station through Asterisk PRI.
Agent gets connected with

customer. Agent puts customer on hold. Agent dials another PSTN number which
is of IVR gateway.

Agent now makes conference(Station facility)  with customer and IVR gateway.
Gateway plays an IVR

asking customer to enter his customer id number.

My question is, will DTMF get forwarded to IVR gateway?

I am asked to implement this and not having PRI for the moment in my
Asterisk box.

Thanking you in advance.

-AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Contradiction between 2 AMI actions QueueSummary and Queuestatus

2010-12-17 Thread Asterisk Man
Guys,
Why is such contradiction between 2 AMI actions QueueSummary and
Queuestatus?
Look at LoggedIn of QueueSummary and Event: QueueMember.
Also LongestHoldTime of QueueSummary does not give correct value.

-

Action: QueueSummary
Queue: retailBanking

Response: Success
Message: Queue summary will follow

Event: QueueSummary
Queue: retailBanking
LoggedIn: 0
Available: 0
Callers: 0
HoldTime: 22
TalkTime: 231
LongestHoldTime: 0

Event: QueueSummaryComplete
-
Action: Queuestatus
Queue: retailBanking

Response: Success
Message: Queue status will follow

Event: QueueParams
Queue: retailBanking
Max: 0
Strategy: rrmemory
Calls: 0
Holdtime: 22
TalkTime: 231
Completed: 5
Abandoned: 4
ServiceLevel: 0
ServicelevelPerf: 0.0
Weight: 0

Event: QueueMember
Queue: retailBanking
Name: agent2
Location: SIP/1110
Membership: dynamic
Penalty: 0
CallsTaken: 1
LastCall: 1292570332
Status: 5
Paused: 0

Event: QueueMember
Queue: retailBanking
Name: agent1
Location: SIP/
Membership: dynamic
Penalty: 0
CallsTaken: 3
LastCall: 1292581231
Status: 5
Paused: 0

Event: QueueStatusComplete
-

--AsteriskMan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Contradiction between 2 AMI actions QueueSummary and Queuestatus

2010-12-17 Thread Asterisk Man
Asterisk Version: 1.8.0
Members are added through AddQueueMember in realtime Queues

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Asterisk Man theasterisk...@gmail.comwrote:

 Guys,
 Why is such contradiction between 2 AMI actions QueueSummary and
 Queuestatus?
 Look at LoggedIn of QueueSummary and Event: QueueMember.
 Also LongestHoldTime of QueueSummary does not give correct value.

 -

 Action: QueueSummary
 Queue: retailBanking

 Response: Success
 Message: Queue summary will follow

 Event: QueueSummary
 Queue: retailBanking
 LoggedIn: 0
 Available: 0
 Callers: 0
 HoldTime: 22
 TalkTime: 231
 LongestHoldTime: 0

 Event: QueueSummaryComplete
 -
 Action: Queuestatus
 Queue: retailBanking

 Response: Success
 Message: Queue status will follow

 Event: QueueParams
 Queue: retailBanking
 Max: 0
 Strategy: rrmemory
 Calls: 0
 Holdtime: 22
 TalkTime: 231
 Completed: 5
 Abandoned: 4
 ServiceLevel: 0
 ServicelevelPerf: 0.0
 Weight: 0

 Event: QueueMember
 Queue: retailBanking
 Name: agent2
 Location: SIP/1110
 Membership: dynamic
 Penalty: 0
 CallsTaken: 1
 LastCall: 1292570332
 Status: 5
 Paused: 0

 Event: QueueMember
 Queue: retailBanking
 Name: agent1
 Location: SIP/
 Membership: dynamic
 Penalty: 0
 CallsTaken: 3
 LastCall: 1292581231
 Status: 5
 Paused: 0

 Event: QueueStatusComplete
 -

 --AsteriskMan

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users