tune2fs -m 0 [device]
:) not anymore ;p
David Backeberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Steve
Edwardsasterisk@sedwards.com wrote:
I finally found a reason TO run Asterisk as root.
By default, ext[23] file systems reserve 5% of the filesystem for root.
Hehe, sounds like
No
That says:
Join Conference 123456
The PIN for the Conference is 123456
What you need to do is setup the conference ID, guest PIN, admin PIN in
the meetme.conf
and then use
exten = ,1,MeetMe(123456,cMaAsxp,)
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. I must be brain cramping badly
I'll put in my $0.02CAD for Polycom. We use the 330s here.
Singer
Geraint Lee wrote:
I personally find the snom phones to be generally ugly and
un-finger-friendly, in terms of reliability and quality, never had
any trouble, good phones all in all, i just can't get past the tacky
look and
David Gibbons wrote:
snip
...routing via satellite adds about a quarter second of latency to the path.
Is that too much?
/snip
Eric,
I believe that you are mistaken. Routing via satellite adds about a quarter
second of latency PER TRIP from earth to orbit. This is simply due to the
What's wrong with top posting?
David Gibbons wrote:
Lol.
I'm actually in the small minority who prefers top posting to bottom posting.
-d
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Howes
At least fake your from email to make it believable..
hh174 wrote:
Hello all,
Probably a bad news for all...
The Undercompetent Olle E Johansson decided to leave the asterisk team
to create his own Voip server.
The server will be called Minisk (due probably to his poor competence in
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:20:20PM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
One of the more common embedded platforms for Asterisk is the Soekris
net5501 (or 4501 if you don't need as much processing power)
Agreed. Though, given the Asus eeeBox (1.6Ghz Atom) can be had for
Sorry, forgot a link
http://www.eeextra.com/eee/eeebox-specs.html
Singer XJ Wang wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:20:20PM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
One of the more common embedded platforms for Asterisk is the Soekris
net5501 (or 4501 if you don't need as much
Mike wrote:
You can reliably run asterisk on just about any x86 hardware. You don't
mention what kind of stresses you are going to put on it, so your sizing
questions are impossible to answer. How many extensions? How many
simultaneous calls? Will you be transcoding? Routing to/from the
Mmm, $100-$125 What? USD? CAD? AUD?
If you're willing to a little bit more, I'll strongly recommend Polycom
IP 430. We're using them and they
are absolutely painless (well, except the initial package of 100 of
those which were heavy and caused
some back pain ;p)
Singer
David Ruggles wrote:
[snipped]
You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
sufficient airflow when the
We got a few of those in 1U chassis.. if you think those are quiet...
Steve Underwood wrote:
Singer XJ Wang wrote:
[snipped]
You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
fans at the back or front
Honestly, how are you guys expecting a 24 Port POE to be fanless?
Lets start with some logical points here:
1) 24 Ports x 15.4W/Port = 369.4Watts + Switch Power = ~400Watts... now
Power Supply isn't that efficient so you're getting probably a 500Watt
Power Supply (assuming 80%)...
2) with a
Okay, point out one reasonably priced PoE switch that has it.
Christian Victor wrote:
2009/2/2 Singer XJ Wang w...@pythian.com mailto:w...@pythian.com
[snipped]
You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney,
40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000
As much as I'm an open source guy, but the OpenMoko phones are worthless
IMHO. Its suppose to be a modern phone, but seriously GRPS only? Is it
too much to ask for at least EDGE if not 3G?
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Wednesday, January 07, 2009 a las 09:50:06AM +0100, Grygoriy
of each message.
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Wednesday, January 07, 2009 a las 10:55:55AM -0500, Singer XJ Wang
escribió:
As much as I'm an open source guy, but the OpenMoko phones are worthless
IMHO. Its suppose to be a modern phone, but seriously GRPS only? Is it
too much to ask for at least
Phone Guy: NO PHONE FOR YOU!
Karl Fife wrote:
This has got to be one of the funniest threads ever to grace this forum.
Sorry honey! ...CLICK.
In my house, this might require a more 'diplomatic' approach :-)
-Karl
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:41:40 +0300, RoLaNd RoLaNd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype mjgraves
FWD 54245
Original Message
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 5 min limitation on phone calls! how to!
From: Singer XJ Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, August 21, 2008 2:42 pm
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
18 matches
Mail list logo
