[asterisk-users] Asterisk codec negotiation and canreinvite=no

2011-04-11 Thread Effie Mouzeli
Hi all, I realise that asterisk's codec negotiation has been discussed in the past multiple times. What I haven't been able to understand is how asterisk decides which video codecs to advertise to the other end when canreinvite=no in sip.conf and the initial caller doesn't support video.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk codec negotiation and canreinvite=no

2011-04-12 Thread Effie Mouzeli
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:38 pm, Paul Belanger wrote: On 11-04-11 10:26 AM, Effie Mouzeli wrote: This may lead to some buggy clients not to accept the call (with 488), but I've noticed some cases where a callee was behind NAT, an INVITE with one video codec would me forwarded properly

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk rewrites From header when CALLERID(num-pres)=prohib_passed_screen is set

2012-01-19 Thread effie mouzeli
When the date was Thu Jan 19 2012 12:12:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello, IMHO asterisk acts exactly as it should. How else do you think it should it prevent sending out the callerid name or num when you set it to prohib? This behaviour is new in 1.8, since in 1.6 it work differently (not

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk rewrites From header when CALLERID(num-pres)=prohib_passed_screen is set

2012-01-19 Thread effie mouzeli
When the date was Thu Jan 19 2012 15:23:04, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: On 01/19/2012 05:56 AM, effie mouzeli wrote: When the date was Thu Jan 19 2012 12:12:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello, IMHO asterisk acts exactly as it should. How else do you think it should it prevent sending out