Re: [asterisk-users] NuFone suggests to use Vonage!!!!

2006-07-09 Thread Joe Baptista

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Andrew D Kirch wrote:

 To some extent I see your point and have been on the receiving end of
 one of Jeremy's tirades.
  I've since decided that NuFone is an interesting study in whether your
 business can survive
 with only clueful customers.

Some people are into SM I guess.  We have used NuFone.  No problems
during that period.  If you know what you doing it's not bad.

regards
joe
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 Forward problem codec issue

2005-05-02 Thread Joe Baptista
:19:18
 NOTICE[2185]: channel.c:1314 ast_read: Dropping incompatible voice frame on
 Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2 of format g729 since our native format has
 changed to ulaw
  -- SIP/---.---.241.35-4e1f answered Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2
  -- Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 answered
 SIP/---.---.241.35-40400490 -- Attempting native bridge of
 SIP/---.---.241.35-40400490 and SIP/---.---.241.35-4e1f == Spawn exten
 (Charity, ---0059, 1) exited non-zero on
 'Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2'

 */SNIP

 Im sure I could change everything to ulaw G711 the problem would go away
 but I do not want to do that.

 Any Ideas?

 Thanks
 Scott H

-- 
Joe Baptista
www.joebaptista.com


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] PSTN number with callhunt and voicemail we web interface

2004-12-08 Thread Joe Baptista

can anyone recommend a plain ol fashioned telco in north america where i
can get a DID with call hunt and voicemail which can be programmed via web
interface.

thanks and pls pvt
joe
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with voicemailsystem

2004-11-27 Thread Joe Baptista


On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone knows a possibility to disable the message of the server
 and only able the message of our client?
 Example: client says:Im not in my office, please leave a message.
 Well, after this message the sever should send the signal and record
 the opposite, without the message... to leave your message please
 speak after... blablabla

a fast and dirty solution is to replace the server message to leave your
message   with a the beep file.

regards
joe
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Is there alist of codec by asterisk version?

2004-07-09 Thread Joe Baptista

Is there alist of codecs asterisk actually has per version number - i.e.
0.7, 0.9 etc?

On 9 Jul 2004, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:

 Instead of all you may want to try listing the codecs asterisk
 actually has (this is from -current):

 ;
 ; codecs: a_mu adpcm alaw g726 gsm ilbc lpc10 ulaw
 ;
 disallow=all
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw
 allow=gsm
 allow=adpcm
 allow=g726
 allow=ilbc
 ;; allow=lpc10  (robotman)

very helpful wolfgang - thanks

joe

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Slackware 10.0 and asterisk and 2.4 vs 2.6

2004-07-08 Thread Joe Baptista

I'm installing the new Slackware 10.0 distribution - but not sure if i
should go with the 2.4 kernal - which i think is the default install - or
the new 2.6 kernal?  anyone running * and slackware 10.0 with 2.6 kernal?

thanks
joe

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FYI House bill exports analog phone regs to VoIP

2004-07-07 Thread Joe Baptista

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:31:21 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Politech] House bill exports analog phone regs to VoIP



http://www.politechbot.com/docs/boucher.voip.bill.070604.pdf

There's a new bill in the House of Representatives to regulate phone
calls made over the Internet. It was introduced this evening by Reps.
Rick Boucher, D-Va., and Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., and it's called the
Advanced Internet Communications Services Act of 2004. I've placed the
text online and have a summary and commentary at News.com.

The AICS bill takes a more regulatory approach than a competing proposal
from Rep. Chip Pickering, R-Miss. Boucher and Stearns say VoIP servcies
shall be subject to access charges and universal service taxes --
which is a really big deal. More on this later.

Bill text:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/boucher.voip.bill.070604.pdf

News.com coverage:
http://news.com.com/Congress+mulls+new+Net+phone+rules/2100-7352_3-5258191.html?tag=cd.top
http://news.com.com/Can+VoIP+survive+Congress%3F/2010-1028_3-5256334.html?tag=st.rn
___
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] VoIP under attack ... Bellcos rock and roll out PR

2004-07-07 Thread Joe Baptista

There has been a sudden increase in VoIP pro and con articles.  Lots of
political discussion.  I think we are seeing the first major PR attempts
by Telcos to stem the VoIP tide.

regards
joe

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush ?-) intel - telco contract? time will tell.

2004-07-06 Thread Joe Baptista

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Kevin Walsh wrote:

 People are entitled to ask questions;  If no questions were asked then
 this mail list would not have the volume of articles that it has.

Absolutly correct - except for Randy who has a tendancy of starting
arguments over irrelevant trivia.

My own concern is that this list does not degrade into some DNS government
mailing list full of trolling.

I've seen randy post here many times.  Not a problem - but his recent
posts smell of trolling.  Certainly arrogance and attitude were in
abudant evidence.

But maybe i'm wrong and just a bit too sensitive based on past
experiences.  We'll see.

One of the things I appreciate in this forum is that people communicate
and support each other - and they do a good job of it.  We all share the
same agenda - bury the telcos and move on.  I know randy well - hes intel
- would not surprise me if he was here with an agenda on behalf of the
spooks he works for and their telco investments.  After all he's never
participate in anything unless he's gettin paid - randys no fool.

but i could be wrong - time will tell.  and as far as i'm concerned i
really dont' think we should stretch the subject further

cheers
joe

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: iax or sip

2004-07-05 Thread Joe Baptista

On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:

 i did not criticize the protocol.  remember, my question started
 with

  i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my needs.

 i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything.  if i did, iax
 might well be one of the technologies i would consider.  but i
 don't.

Your up to no good again.  Trying to troll?  Look Bush it pretty easy - if
you want a PBX use asterisk if not go away.

regards
joe

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


IS VONAGE LISTENING? RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration

2004-07-01 Thread Joe Baptista

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Jay Milk wrote:

 Like I said, they just seem to be lazy and/or badly organized.  If they
 can do LNP, why can't they change a hardline into a softphone, break
 one number out onto a different ATA, etc?  I basically laid it out for
 them, saying If you can't move my 2nd line from this ATA to a new ATA,
 then I'll need to cancel that line... I no longer have that line.  Not
 being able to something this simple cost them over $500/year from me...
 I wonder how many other Vonage users will drop them because of such
 things.

We were considering Vonage - but if this is the case - we have no
interest.

Is vinage listening?

regards
joe


  -Original Message-
  From: Steve Kalcevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:01 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration
 
 
  Jay Milk wrote:
 
  I do.  I decided not to bother with Vonage's sub-par and unmotivated
  customer service(*) and plugged my ATA186 into an FXO port.
 
  I never worked with vonage, is there tech support that bad?
 
  --
  Regards,
 
 
  Steve Kalcevich,

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] I need DIDs in Canada and USA with roll over option

2004-06-26 Thread Joe Baptista

I need a provider of DIDs with multiple inbounds.


regards
joe baptista

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Skype 4 Linux

2004-06-24 Thread Joe Baptista

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Stefan de Konink wrote:

 Hi All,

 Since 21 june skype is available to be used on Linux, with a static
 binary, which includes QT, of 8 meg its big.

 http://www.skype.com/help_linux_faq.html

 I presume, with some hacking, there could be a possibility to use the
 Skype program as a Channel. (Eq. Skype is started, and with a visual
 scripting thing a connection is made and Asterisk connects via OSS (or the
 alsa emulation layer)).

 It is a bit of work, but reverse enginering is too :)

Just write some code we can stick in asterisk.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] 911 emergency service and VoIP

2004-06-16 Thread Joe Baptista

I understand that most VoIP providers allow for 911 calling but that 911
service is not the same as that available to PSTN.

From what I understand a 911 Call Will Go To A General Access Line at the
Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). This is different from the 911
Emergency Response Center where traditional 911 calls go.

Does anyone know how I can get information on howto contact the people at
the Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs)?  Is there alist somewhere I
can reference.

thanks
joe baptista


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * as conference server for shoutcast.

2004-06-13 Thread Joe Baptista

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Jeremy McNamara wrote:

 Joe Baptista wrote:

  i.e.
 
 iax1---+
 iax2---|
 iax3---|-- * -- MeetMe -- shoutcast radio
 ---|
 iaxn---+


 This already exists today in Asterisk:  show application ICES

excellent - but i get this when i run the command on console

pmg*CLI show application ICES
Your application(s) is (are) not registered

i'm using * 0.9.0 -  i assume it's available in a later version.  or can i
impliment with 0.9.0 if i follow bartons guidelines at

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+Ices

p.s. everytime i find something new about asterisk - i fall in luv.  god
bless you guys for makin it possible.

regards
joe baptista

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * as conference server for shoutcast.

2004-06-11 Thread Joe Baptista

i.e.

   iax1---+
   iax2---|
   iax3---|-- * -- MeetMe -- shoutcast radio
   ---|
   iaxn---+

would be a great way for corporation to broadcast meetings.

board meetings

live management meetings

live sales demonstrations

and all interactive.

you get the picture.

right now i'm thinking of just patching a cable from the * operator
console to a shoutcast server.  thank god for old tech.

but i would luv to explore the potential to feed an mp3 stream to a
shoutcast server. * is mp3 complient.

i'd be willing to use my test system - which is currently called
frankenstein and for good reason - to experiment.

just an idea to the * community.

regards
joe baptista



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] any banks or financial institutions using asterisk

2004-06-09 Thread Joe Baptista

I've been approached to research and develop a system using asterisk.  It
will be used mainly to provide voice support to about 10,000 IAX clients
operating on bank ATMs.

So was wondering if there were any financial institutions, banks etc.
using * and any comments would be much appreciated.

regards
joe baptista
www.joebaptista.com
www.baptista.god


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] dialplan experts needed

2004-06-08 Thread Joe Baptista

I have the same situation - i.e. three different extensions scattered
about.  But I don't try them each individually.  When a call comes in my
asterisk attempts to ring up to four different devices at the same time.

To do this using your dial plan is easy - i.e.

exten = 555,1,Dial(SIP/1000SIP/2000SIP/3000,30)
exten = 555,2,VoiceMail2(u3278)
exten = 555,3,Hangup

All the phones will ring at the same time and the phone to pick up first
wins.

regards
joe

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Matthew Simpson wrote:

 In this dialplan, the SIP user agent is a Sipura two line adapter with line
 1 as SIP ID 1000 and line 2 as SIP ID 2000.  Basically I have this set
 up so that 1000 and 2000 are lines in hunting on incoming extension 555.

 I want an incoming call to try to ring ext. 1000, if 1000 is busy, then ring
 2000, if 2000 is also busy than ring Voicemail.  Here is what I have now and
 it seems to work okay:

 exten = 555,1,Dial(SIP/1000,30)
 exten = 555,102,Dial(SIP/2000,30)
 exten = 555,103,VoiceMail2(u3278)
 exten = 555,104,Hangup
 exten = 555,2,VoiceMail2(u3278)
 exten = 555,3,Hangup

 Is this correct?  What if there were a third SIP device 3000 ?  Would it
 look like:

 exten = 555,1,Dial(SIP/1000,30)
 exten = 555,102,Dial(SIP/2000,30)
 exten = 555,103,Dial(SIP/3000,30)
 exten = 555,104,Voicemail2(u3278)
 exten = 555,105,Hangup
 exten = 555,2,VoiceMail2(u3278)
 exten = 555,3,Hangup

 That doesn't seem correct.  Also, quick note, the user does not want to have
 a different busy and unavailable message, so that is why I have it set up to
 always be the unavailable message for voicemail.

 thanks for the help!
 Matthew

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FireFly - no sound after first call

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Baptista

I've been watching to see if this problem comes up with anyone elses
firefly - but so far i'm the only one experiencing the problem.

When I connect to either my asterisk server or FWD all goes well on the
first call.  I can hear and talk.  But every call after the first one I
end up with no sound - not even ringing.

I use win98 and have tried it on two systems with win98 installed.

thanks
joe

p.s. if any other info can provide let me know.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] e164.org

2004-05-23 Thread Joe Baptista

On Sun, 23 May 2004, Tony Hoyle wrote:

 Simon Dorfman wrote:

  I wonder if someone can help me understand this.  Let's say I configure my
  asterisk box to use e164 and then I try to call a phone number in Germany.
  I'm in the U.S.A.  So if the number I'm calling in Germany is registered in
  e164's dns, would my call be routed directly via their voip provider?  Or
  directly to their asterisk box?  And would it be free?

  From the looks of it, they're just a directory... it looks like their not
 running asterisk themselves.

 They use something called EnumLookup which I guess is some kind of
 plugin/script.  If the number you're calling is in their database, it calls
 the VOIP number directly, otherwise it calls the POTS number

No they just provide the dns - it's your equipment that does the
connecting.  Exampple - if you use my number 17058721310 and conver it to
enum format it will look like this:  0.1.3.1.2.7.8.5.0.7.1.e164.org

If you do a look up of that number - you'll see the associated enum
pointer. example: dig 0.1.3.1.2.7.8.5.0.7.1.e164.org. any

;  DiG 9.2.2  0.1.3.1.2.7.8.5.0.7.1.e164.org. any
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 44741
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 9, ADDITIONAL: 4

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;0.1.3.1.2.7.8.5.0.7.1.e164.org.IN  ANY

;; ANSWER SECTION:
0.1.3.1.2.7.8.5.0.7.1.e164.org. 600 IN  TXT Joe Baptista
0.1.3.1.2.7.8.5.0.7.1.e164.org. 600 IN  NAPTR   100 10 u E2U+IAX2 
!^\\+17058721310$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/17058721310! .

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  alberta-2.bcwireless.net.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  ns1.au1.com.au.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  ns1.e164.org.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  ns2.au1.com.au.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  ns2.au1.net.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  ns3.bcwireless.net.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  apollo.bcwireless.net.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  mutual.bcwireless.net.
e164.org.   600 IN  NS  alberta.bcwireless.net.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns2.au1.net.172800  IN  A   202.87.28.2
mutual.bcwireless.net.  3600IN  A   198.231.65.11
alberta.bcwireless.net. 3600IN  A   209.115.243.234
alberta-2.bcwireless.net. 3600  IN  A   66.244.202.59

;; Query time: 343 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Sun May 23 10:15:37 2004
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 434

In this case systems doing enum lookups are told to contact th iax2 server
at phone.joebaptista.com use a guest login.

So basically enum is a facility which uses the dns to route calls in such
a way that they bypass the regular PSTN system if an internet routing and
supported protocol exists.

for more information on ENUM visit

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html

and search for enum and e.164.

Now the proper domain for enum is e164.arpa - and the respective
assignments by the ITU of telephone delegations under e164.arpa has been
at best very lame.  As you can well imagine telephone companies have as a
rule refrained from adopting e164 because as I have mentioned above e164
facilitates the bypassing of PSTN via the internet and that would of
course mean lost revenue.

Check out http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/enum/ for more info on the politics
and bureacracy of enum.  You can get information on enum assignments and
registries at:

http://www.ripe.net/enum/request-archives/

At you can see there are very few official enum registries - so I think
what e164.org is doing in invaluable to the community.

regards
joe baptista

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] New ENUM service, what do you think?

2004-05-02 Thread Joe Baptista

On Sat, 1 May 2004, Dean Collins wrote:

 Yes but no information about how this will operate, what regulation or
 restrictions on joining, what connection protocols will be used etc etc

agreed - you see alot of business fluff - but the technicals are very
important and on many of these ventures they fail to include them.

regards
joe
www.baptista.god


 Cheers,
 Dean


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reid A.
 Forrest
 Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2004 8:21 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] New ENUM service, what do you think?

 From http://www.thevpf.com/

 To join, please e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone 1-212-232-2020
 (Mon-Fri
 9AM-5PM EST).

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jimfl
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:11 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New ENUM service, what do you think?

 Jim/frank,
 Can you give us more information about how to access this enum? I've
 been to the stealth web site and there is no information about access.
 
 I look forward with interest to what you have up and running today for
 asterisk users to benefit from.
 
 Cheers,
 Dean

 Sorry, I am not associated with Stealth in any way.  Just saw the news
 story
 and
 thought it would be of interest to Asterisk users.  It sounds like you
 don't
 have to
 be a VOIP provider to get access to their service.  They talk about
 businesses
 using the service.  If anyone finds out how to get access to their
 service,
 please
 post.

 Jim

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using IAXTel to dial FWD

2004-05-02 Thread Joe Baptista

On Sat, 1 May 2004, Rich Adamson wrote:


  now. But if you have a look at this page -
  http://www.freeworlddialup.com/advanced/iax you will find that you can now
  use FWD with IAX2 along with SIP :)

 FWIW, I just moved our FWD account to iax2, and it works rather well
 with *. The referenced web page does have a couple of configuration
 errors on it, but nothing all that difficult to diagnose/fix.

 Also, it appears the FWD - IaxTel definitions are incorrect (again)
 causing problems with connectivity in both directions.

Could you share your conf files with us.

I can connect to FWD on my asterisk - but FWD only see me as an external
SIP agent and not a SIP client of the FWD network.  DOn't know exactly why
- so would luv to compare your conf files.

thanks
joe

Joe Baptista: USG Portal www.joebaptista.com, Personal www.baptista.god

 LOW: low cost, Low Lands. http://www.dot.low/
   Everything you need to know about LOW

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users